Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Pussy pictures on Wikipedia!


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/5/2006 9:58:57 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline 		http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulva

Whoda thunk it?  Are they going to get shut down for posting pornography without a proper license?
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/5/2006 10:07:27 PM   
Marc2b


Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006
Status: offline 		Nice to know that Wikipedia is good for something.

Edited because I cliked the wrong stupid smiley.

< Message edited by Marc2b -- 10/5/2006 10:10:18 PM >

_____________________________

Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/5/2006 10:31:20 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline 		Wikipedia is good for many things

BTW I do not see a labeled photo of the female anatomy as being pornographic.. but that is just my opinion

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to Marc2b)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/5/2006 10:33:47 PM   
Bluebird


Posts: 384
Joined: 2/17/2006
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline 		You don't need a "license" to show anything, but if you show "graphic or simulated lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area" or sex (of any variety including masturbation) or "sadistic or masochistic abuse", you do need a 2257 statement certifying the location of the records proving the model(s) were of age when footage was shot.  This of course, assumes said material is located/produced/hosted within the USA.
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002257----000-.html
 
However, you could argue that that Wikipedia entry is purely educational (and heaven knows, a lot of men could do with some education about where the appropriate parts are located!), and therefore is not subject to said asinine law which does nothing to protect children or prevent kiddie porn and everything to harass adult producers and performers.

_____________________________

Love is patient, love is kind. I am neither. Get over it.

(in reply to Marc2b)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/5/2006 11:04:27 PM   
CrappyDom


Posts: 1883
Joined: 4/11/2006
From: Sacramento
Status: offline 		You would think they wouldn't use the vagina of a girl who wasn't the least turned on, I would have chosen the vagina of a woman who had been through childbirth.

(in reply to Bluebird)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/5/2006 11:45:06 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline 		You people do realize that I was being sarcastic, right?

(in reply to CrappyDom)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/5/2006 11:48:25 PM   
Bluebird


Posts: 384
Joined: 2/17/2006
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

You people do realize that I was being sarcastic, right?


Well, I DID assume that you had probably seen a sample of sacred womanliness at some point and therefore you were simply amused and not WOWed. 

_____________________________

Love is patient, love is kind. I am neither. Get over it.

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/6/2006 3:34:01 AM   
cuddleheart50


Posts: 9718
Joined: 2/20/2006
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulva

Whoda thunk it?  Are they going to get shut down for posting pornography without a proper license?



Now we know what you do in your spare time....

_____________________________

Dance like no one is watching,
Sing like no one is listening.
Love like you've never been hurt
and live like it's heaven on Earth.


(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/6/2006 4:07:33 AM   
Aileen68


Posts: 6091
Joined: 8/2/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cuddleheart50

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulva

Whoda thunk it?  Are they going to get shut down for posting pornography without a proper license?



Now we know what you do in your spare time....


I hope that's not all he does.
I bet LaM used to sneak and look at the National Geographics when he was a little boy. 

(in reply to cuddleheart50)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/6/2006 7:13:22 AM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline 		Laughing.  Guilty as charged.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aileen68

I bet LaM used to sneak and look at the National Geographics when he was a little boy. 

(in reply to Aileen68)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/9/2006 9:10:53 AM   
Aeon


Posts: 199
Joined: 6/5/2006
Status: offline 		At the very least they could have found a nice looking one to use rather than one as Crappy Dom said looked "unaroused" or otherwise unattractive. Seriously, imagine the people who are actually looking this up. What would you think if that was the first pussy you ever saw? eek   lol

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/9/2006 9:15:30 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline 		I just got kinda grossed out at photo #2, with dirty fingernails......call me weird.

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to Aeon)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/9/2006 12:53:44 PM   
windchymes


Posts: 9410
Joined: 4/18/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aeon

At the very least they could have found a nice looking one to use rather than one as Crappy Dom said looked "unaroused" or otherwise unattractive. Seriously, imagine the people who are actually looking this up. What would you think if that was the first pussy you ever saw? eek   lol


Yeah, but if they showed one all shaved and glistening with a clit ring, and the nails were painted FuckMe Red, you know someone out there would scream, "Pornography!!!"  They have to show a "real" one for clinical and educational purposes.

They have a nice link to "Cameltoe", with a photo, too!  I never knew "Mooseknuckle" was another term for it, lmao!  God, ya gotta love Wikipedia.

< Message edited by windchymes -- 10/9/2006 12:57:42 PM >

_____________________________

You know it's going to be a GOOD blow job when she puts a Breathe Right strip on first.

Pick-up artists and garbage men should trade names.

(in reply to Aeon)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/9/2006 2:29:54 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline 		You can find a picture of a clit piercing on Wikipedia here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitoral_hood_piercing

More pussy pics here, for those who just can't get enough:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mons_veneris
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pubic_hair

Alas, no doggie-style pics.  I checked.

quote:

ORIGINAL: windchymes

Yeah, but if they showed one all shaved and glistening with a clit ring, and the nails were painted FuckMe Red, you know someone out there would scream, "Pornography!!!"  They have to show a "real" one for clinical and educational purposes.

(in reply to windchymes)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/11/2006 7:59:03 AM   
Yang4yin


Posts: 1677
Joined: 7/26/2006
From: NC (USA)
Status: offline 		Don't forget to check out the external links, like this one:
http://www.the-clitoris.com/n_html/n_v_image1.htm

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/11/2006 8:03:20 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		Well it's a good thing they got 'snap' shots on Wiki, how else is a guy gonna know what the chasm of extasy looks like with all the fakes here?


LOLOLOLOL,
Ron 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Yang4yin)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/11/2006 10:09:22 PM   
KinkDomCum


Posts: 159
Joined: 8/23/2005
Status: offline 		Lets not forget:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hymen

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/11/2006 10:26:39 PM   
KinkDomCum


Posts: 159
Joined: 8/23/2005
Status: offline 		Not a pussy pic per se, but definite wikiporn: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felatio

(in reply to KinkDomCum)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! - 10/11/2006 11:39:47 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline 		Well, but that's just a drawing.  They have all kinds of drawings of stuff.  I think we need to set the bar at color photos only.

(in reply to KinkDomCum)
Profile   Post #: 19
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094