gooddogbenji
Posts: 5094
Joined: 11/15/2005 From: Toronto Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: APhacetoSit In my humble opinion, Ma'am, try to screen out anyone who does not inquire about Your general well being in the first paragraph, and/or whose sole or primary focus is in what they want. From what i have been led to believe, this will leave a manageable number of candidates. Not an attack on your specific message, but a general statement. There are hundreds of possible criteria you can use to narrow down the number of messages you respond to. No sex mentionned, sex mentionned, no typos, certain info given, certain info not given, pic included, no pic included, inquiry about this, no inquiry about this, pretty much anything can be used, and often times opposite criteria for different people. Now, that's all well and good, but if you expect every "good" match to do this, and toss everyone else by the wayside, it's kind of a shame, no? For example, I don't ask how a Domme is doing. What frame of reference do I have? I start out with a polite introduction, a bit about myself, where I live, what I'm looking for in broad terms, my hobbies, and the like, then go into how her profile corresponds to my interests, and finally ask some questions which her profile spurred in me, as well as the things I told her, like what kind of work she does. By almost any single criteria elimination, I am out. Not saying I'm a perfect sub, but I am pretty fucking good looking. So why not read the whole message until you get to a point where you know enough to make a decision, rather than base it on the psychic capabilities of anyone who writes you to know what your exact needs are in a message? Yours, benji PS: I tend to delete any message that doesn't mention how unbelievably large my cock is. It really cuts down on the number of messages I have to feel guilty about ignoring.
< Message edited by gooddogbenji -- 10/7/2006 10:39:06 AM >
_____________________________
Prevent global warming. Stop burning patchouli.
|