RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill

RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

ToGiveDivine -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/9/2006 8:49:29 AM)
You're just not being fair - the Democrats controlled both houses of Congress for the majority of 4 decades until the mid 90's and they spent, spent, spent and then raised taxes so they could spend spend spend. Now, the Republicans are in control of both houses and it's their turn to spend, spend, spend - let's be fair and let the other side waste our money too

SpinnerofTales -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/9/2006 8:55:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ToGiveDivine You're just not being fair - the Democrats controlled both houses of Congress for the majority of 4 decades until the mid 90's and they spent, spent, spent and then raised taxes so they could spend spend spend. Now, the Republicans are in control of both houses and it's their turn to spend, spend, spend - let's be fair and let the other side waste our money too The difference is, that when the Democrats spent money trying to help the poor. The republicans, on the other hand, figure that if they're going to give money to anyone, it should be to someone who knows how to handle it. And who knows better how to handle money than millionairs? Or, put another way; Both the Democrats and the Republicans are going to screw you. But at least the Democrats offer to pay for the condom.

ToGiveDivine -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/9/2006 8:56:35 AM)
Julia, Does it make you feel better to attack Bush personally? - so you don't agree with his policies, his decisions, or the direction he is going - a lot of people didn't like the direction Clinton took - does that make him an evil man? And don't start some diatribe that Clinton was so much better than Bush - he's a "monkeyboy" too - anyone with the title of President of the United States for the last 60 years has been a monkeyboy. The Democrats are just as scummy, corrupt, and disgusting as the Republicans. The world is a messed up place simply because there are too many people that hate just for the sake of hating.

ToGiveDivine -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/9/2006 9:02:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SpinnerofTales quote: ORIGINAL: ToGiveDivine You're just not being fair - the Democrats controlled both houses of Congress for the majority of 4 decades until the mid 90's and they spent, spent, spent and then raised taxes so they could spend spend spend. Now, the Republicans are in control of both houses and it's their turn to spend, spend, spend - let's be fair and let the other side waste our money too The difference is, that when the Democrats spent money trying to help the poor. The republicans, on the other hand, figure that if they're going to give money to anyone, it should be to someone who knows how to handle it. And who knows better how to handle money than millionairs? Or, put another way; Both the Democrats and the Republicans are going to screw you. But at least the Democrats offer to pay for the condom. OOOOHHHH PLEEEAASSEEEE!!!!!! The Democrats are spending money to help themselves - just like the Republicans. Do you honestly think that John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, etc. give a rats ass about you? (If you give a sizable donation to their campaign or they can use you as a way to get positive media time they will and that's the extent of it) The Democrats didn't buy that condom they're using on you - the taxed you for it. With either party, you getting screwed and you're paying the bill

sissifytoserve -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/9/2006 9:06:29 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ToGiveDivine The Democrats didn't buy that condom they're using on you - the taxed you for it. With either party, you getting screwed and you're paying the bill Agreed...we are screwed either way.... but in the past 5+ years the repubs are using the sandpaper condom on all of us.

juliaoceania -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/9/2006 9:35:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ToGiveDivine Julia, Does it make you feel better to attack Bush personally? - so you don't agree with his policies, his decisions, or the direction he is going - a lot of people didn't like the direction Clinton took - does that make him an evil man? And don't start some diatribe that Clinton was so much better than Bush - he's a "monkeyboy" too - anyone with the title of President of the United States for the last 60 years has been a monkeyboy. The Democrats are just as scummy, corrupt, and disgusting as the Republicans. The world is a messed up place simply because there are too many people that hate just for the sake of hating. There is nothing I could say that would make me feel better about the 1000s.. hundreds of 1000s that have died under Bush.. he is the epitome of evil in my eyes

dorsaisgirl1 -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/9/2006 8:50:37 PM)
there is nothing wrong with being left wing ........i myself dont like politicions not one of them are worth a crap .... but since i have a choice i would rather have a demacrat in power.

dorsaisgirl1 -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/9/2006 8:54:43 PM)
clinton got a bj bush and his decisions have killed more people then the plag but your right we shouldent talk about that lets not villify the ass hole

dorsaisgirl1 -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/9/2006 8:55:56 PM)
i agree with julia

dorsaisgirl1 -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/9/2006 9:05:47 PM)
it was bush who has pushed the national debt up higher then it has ever been meenwhile the men and wemen he sent to an early graves familys where pitching in to buy there children bulit prof vests becouse the ones that george bush chose to deliver the supliys to our service men /wemen where selling them on the black market . anyone who can say with a strait face that bush is a good man makes me sick

Sinergy -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/9/2006 9:50:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: sissifytoserve quote: ORIGINAL: ToGiveDivine The Democrats didn't buy that condom they're using on you - the taxed you for it. With either party, you getting screwed and you're paying the bill Agreed...we are screwed either way.... but in the past 5+ years the repubs are using the sandpaper condom on all of us. "Men make my butt itch." Andrew Dice Clay

nefertari -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/9/2006 10:16:08 PM)
I don't expect much immediate change if Democrats gain control of Congress. There really does need to be more oversight. What I truly hope for, though, is a Congress in 2006 and a President in 2008 that can lessen the polarization that currently exists. (Yes, I do live in my own world. I like it here. I can dream, can't I.) In a related topic, The Columbus Dispatch is running a series on religion and politics and published poll results. They polled readers who are also registered voters, the State Legislature and the 2 dominant Gubernatorial candidates. What surprised me was not that the legislators and candidates were out of touch with the voters, but the extent to which they were - across the board.

popeye1250 -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/9/2006 10:25:26 PM)
Here's an idea, why don't we just get off the Merry Go Round and vote in people who aren't Dems or Repubs. It'll feel good when you stop banging your head against the wall. Our options are not limited to "either or." Clinton and Bush are both no good. Both failures and both went to Yale.

Sinergy -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/9/2006 11:08:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 Both failures and both went to Yale. Fascinating that you would refer to a Rhodes Scholar who got elected Governor and then President as a "failure." How exactly do you define success? Sinergy

popeye1250 -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/10/2006 2:20:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sinergy quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 Both failures and both went to Yale. Fascinating that you would refer to a Rhodes Scholar who got elected Governor and then President as a "failure." How exactly do you define success? Sinergy Sinergy, you forgot , Made the U.S. a world laughing stock. Was Impeached by the U.S. Congress. Sexually harrassed dozens of women and had to cut short his "Rhodes Scholar" studies over an allegation of the rape of an English woman. Allegations of rape in a Holiday Inn while "Mr. Rhode's Scholar" was the Atty Gen. of the State of Arkansas. What was that lady's name again? Embarrased our European allies by going into Europe and interfereing in Bosnia and Kosovo. How would we in the U.S. like it if Europe sent Troops to the U.S.? And probably the worst thing he did was to lie to the American People right on National T.V.; "I want you to listen to me! I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinski!" Yup, he was quite a "success" with the ladies anyway, wasn't he? There's been quite a few "successful" M.D.s that are now in prison for rape and other crimes. They'll probably be "successfull" baggers at a grocery store some day. I could go on but I don't feel like typing 6 pages. How do I define success? Not by Bush or Clinton that's for sure! Sinergy, I can do Bush too if you'd like. I guess some people kind of like having the wool pulled over their eyes.

Level -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/10/2006 2:26:57 AM)
Come on, Popeye, all that was from the "vast, right-wing conspiracy". Well, maybe a little of it was, but let's not muddy the waters. [:D]

juliaoceania -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/10/2006 8:33:17 AM)
Allegations Allegations The rape allegations were the ones that were never proven, Clinton was a womanizer and a slut, but I sincerely and highly doubt he was a rapist... most women would have had sex with him glady, hell I even had one wet dream about him when he was first elected. The man drips sex appeal. I do not like him much because of NAFTA, but having sex with lots of women makes him an evolutionary winner, not a failure. I think it is highly possible his wife and him had an open marriage... here we talk about people consenting to open marrriages and not judging them... and then we do. I voted for him twice knowing he was a slut, because I thought him superior to those running against him.... he still is superior to anyone that has tried to be president since. His are some big shoes to fill and I bet if you held an election today with Bush v Clinton... Bush would get hs ass stomped

mnottertail -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/10/2006 8:40:06 AM)
I gotta laugh at this pedantic shit. Any one of you boys would fuck a girl given a chance. So, the President of the United States gets blowjobs. Goddamit, even a Pimply Faced 20 year old part time paper route delivery boy is going to try for a blowjob. It is American, Godly and Apple Pie, for fuck's sake. WTF? The sexual inclinations of people are somehow tied to their political acumen? You have went too far, some of you people. LOL, Ron

popeye1250 -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/10/2006 8:44:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania Allegations Allegations The rape allegations were the ones that were never proven, Clinton was a womanizer and a slut, but I sincerely and highly doubt he was a rapist... most women would have had sex with him glady, hell I even had one wet dream about him when he was first elected. The man drips sex appeal. I do not like him much because of NAFTA, but having sex with lots of women makes him an evolutionary winner, not a failure. I think it is highly possible his wife and him had an open marriage... here we talk about people consenting to open marrriages and not judging them... and then we do. I voted for him twice knowing he was a slut, because I thought him superior to those running against him.... he still is superior to anyone that has tried to be president since. His are some big shoes to fill and I bet if you held an election today with Bush v Clinton... Bush would get hs ass stomped Julia, LMAO! Clinton? Sex appeal? A guy who "finished himself off" in the oval office sink? He was "dripping" all right. lol Gee, then how about Janet Reno? "RRRRRowl" Have you seen the proboscus on that guy? Years of snorting cocaine has left him looking like W.C. Fields!

juliaoceania -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/10/2006 8:59:59 AM)
Popeye, I am not a male or a lesbian so I cannot judge the sex appeal of Janet Reno I am a het female, so I think I am better qualified to discuss the sex appeal of a man than you are, unless you are attracted to both sexes

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125