RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill

RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

popeye1250 -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/10/2006 9:07:12 AM)
Julia, you DO make me laugh. OK, I guess some women would find George Bush sexy too!

juliaoceania -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/10/2006 9:15:13 AM)
I am sure there are a few men that would find Janet Reno attractive also... Here is a stat that I heard the first year clinton was in office. 80 percent of women when surveyed reported having had a romantic/wet dream about the man. I do not know how true this is, but seeing i was only 23 when I had mine, and he is old enough to be my father, I felt better about the dream. Say whatever you will sabout Clinton, women love him, want to have sex with him, and chase him. He has so much charisma. I know you may hate that, but it is the truth. Bush on the other hand, just EEEEEWWWWWW

Level -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/10/2006 3:25:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania His are some big shoes to fill and I bet if you held an election today with Bush v Clinton... Bush would get hs ass stomped I agree, and would that not be the most interesting election cycle in our lifetime?? [:D]

Sinergy -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/10/2006 7:45:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 Sinergy, you forgot , Made the U.S. a world laughing stock. Yes. Being a laughing stock is far worse than being universally feared by most of our former allies because of Bush's militarily aggressive actions. You win. Peace out. Sinergy

Sinergy -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/10/2006 7:47:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 Julia, you DO make me laugh. OK, I guess some women would find George Bush sexy too! Name 5. Sinergy

juliaoceania -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/10/2006 8:26:27 PM)
quote: Sinergy, you forgot , Made the U.S. a world laughing stock. Was Impeached by the U.S. Congress. No, the congress made us a world laughing stock by impeaching one of the most popular world leaders of that time because he got a blowjob. How foolish our congress looked to the rest of the world

caitlyn -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/10/2006 8:42:35 PM)
I saw former President Clinton speak about a yeat ago, in Houston. There is something about him. All I could think of, is how foolish term limits are for Presidents. He should be our President today ... he would have easily beaten President Bush. It's so hard to find a good leader ... pity we have to remove them just as fast as we discover how good they really are. I would imagine that if he were President today, he would have either not gotten us involved in Iraq, assuming it was a bad idea ... or, if it was indeed something we had to do, at least clearly articulated why this was the case.

swtnsparkling -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/10/2006 8:42:46 PM)
quote: No, the congress made us a world laughing stock oh good grief

tazzzz -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/10/2006 9:41:55 PM)
Republicans and Democrats. They are all on the same team. Alot of Democrats were getting in line to take your rights away from you hand in hand with the Republicans. Take the patriot act for example. They all signed this into law without even reading the friggin document. They are all on the same script. When was the last time you had a change in government and had a law totally reversed from the previous administration? One party starts where the other party left off. Sure they fight back and forth and may make minor changes to what the other party did, but they cant be too obvious about it can they? They all answer to the same big fascist corporations and bankers as big money is the only thing they answer to. It is their want, their need, and their only true real religion. The same thing is happening up here in Canada with our 2 (maybe 3) biggest parties. They sell us out to.

popeye1250 -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/11/2006 12:42:26 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania quote: Sinergy, you forgot , Made the U.S. a world laughing stock. Was Impeached by the U.S. Congress. No, the congress made us a world laughing stock by impeaching one of the most popular world leaders of that time because he got a blowjob. How foolish our congress looked to the rest of the world Here we go again with that "World Leader" stuff! Julia, are you a global socialist? The President of the United States of America is just that. He or she, leads the U.S. I don't know about Clinton being popular overseas. When I was in Donegal, Ireland they were teasing me because they knew I was a "yank" and they called him a "wanker." That's not a compliment either. What does "popularity" have to do with anything? I want someone in the W.H. who can get the job done not do a guestshot on "Survivor." And I don't want to see them on my t.v. everyday either. And for the record I'm an Independant and I don't like Bush either. Clinton was just a lying scumbag in my book. A lowlife. Even Sen Bob Kerry a fellow Dem called him "an expert lier." Ted Bundy had bags of mail from female admirers too. All the serial killers do for whatever reason. Nice bit of convoluted logic regarding "our congress." So "our congress" doesn't speak for The People? They did when Nixon was President.

meatcleaver -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/11/2006 1:16:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: caitlyn All I could think of, is how foolish term limits are for Presidents. He should be our President today ... he would have easily beaten President Bush. It's so hard to find a good leader ... pity we have to remove them just as fast as we discover how good they really are. It seems to me the limits on a President's term of office is one of the most rediculous laws ever. It seems quite obvious it has no other reason but to give a chance to less able politicians to get in the Whitehouse. It also means that about half the time a President is in office is absolutely pointless. They can't get elected for long enough to see any reform of note through. Plain stupid.

UtopianRanger -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/11/2006 2:00:44 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: caitlyn I saw former President Clinton speak about a yeat ago, in Houston. There is something about him. All I could think of, is how foolish term limits are for Presidents. He should be our President today ... he would have easily beaten President Bush. It's so hard to find a good leader ... pity we have to remove them just as fast as we discover how good they really are. I would imagine that if he were President today, he would have either not gotten us involved in Iraq, assuming it was a bad idea ... or, if it was indeed something we had to do, at least clearly articulated why this was the case. For some strange reason..... I'm gonna give you a pass today, Caitlyn [8\|] - R

subfever -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/11/2006 7:34:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzzz Republicans and Democrats. They are all on the same team. Alot of Democrats were getting in line to take your rights away from you hand in hand with the Republicans. Take the patriot act for example. They all signed this into law without even reading the friggin document. They are all on the same script. When was the last time you had a change in government and had a law totally reversed from the previous administration? One party starts where the other party left off. Sure they fight back and forth and may make minor changes to what the other party did, but they cant be too obvious about it can they? They all answer to the same big fascist corporations and bankers as big money is the only thing they answer to. It is their want, their need, and their only true real religion. The same thing is happening up here in Canada with our 2 (maybe 3) biggest parties. They sell us out to. That pretty much sizes it up.

juliaoceania -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/11/2006 8:47:44 AM)
No popeye, I am not a global socialist... you were the one that mentioned global humiliation...I was responding to you

popeye1250 -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/11/2006 12:22:45 PM)
Julia, ok, let's try this. What if I told you that I thought that someone you despised was "sexy." Say like,.........oh.........Ann Coulter! Wouldn't that gross you out? I'm driving up to Virginia tommorrow to attend a Navy ship's reunion for the weekend so I won't be on until sunday. There'll be former Sailors and Marines there. People like Bill Clinton is not considered "one of us." He was never what you could call "a man's man." When it became evident that his Army Reserve Unit would be called up to go to Vietnam he bugged out like a little girl. About half of the guys I'm going to be seeing this weekend didn't bug out. They signed up and they went to Vietnam. Do you think that Bill Clinton would be welcomed at a gathering like that? I'm not saying that Vietnam was right or wrong. That would be another thread. When it comes time to honor your committment (much like inB&DS&M) you honor it. Bill Clinton didn't. If you like Bill Clinton fine, that's your business. I don't. Do you think either of us will convince the other? And, that "Lib vs Con" stuff just doesn't work with me because I'm neither.

caitlyn -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/11/2006 1:29:03 PM)
I don't think you would find Ann Coulter appealing, because later down in your post, you seem to indicate that you don't like girls.

juliaoceania -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/11/2006 1:41:04 PM)
You can have her popeye, but I would gag her before you do her, she has rabies, and as far as you know I might be bi and if I were she would be too scrawny for my tastes... I think I would like soft women without adams apples. I never said I like Bill Clinton. What I said is he has charisma and sex appeal. As far as Vietnam, I have respect for those who had problems with Vietnam and did not want to serve with vocal opposition to that conflict (Clinton was opposed to that war). I have distain for those who let others fight it because they were yellow and could get daddy to call in favors so they could serve in the national guard even though they passed up nearly 2000 better qualified applicants to get in, and then went AWOL because they were too damn busy with a silver coke spoon up their nose to actually show up. Just my opinion

popeye1250 -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/11/2006 2:25:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: caitlyn I don't think you would find Ann Coulter appealing, because later down in your post, you seem to indicate that you don't like girls. Caitlyn, I don't like girls. I like women. Julia, and who wrote Clinton's letter to that General asking that he be let out of his committment but to keep it hush hush as he may want to enter politics in the future? It's a full time job defending a coward.

juliaoceania -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/11/2006 2:26:40 PM)
Popeye, He protested the war http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/clinton/etc/draftletter.html

LotusSong -> RE: What If: How the Democrats would rule Capitol Hill (10/11/2006 2:32:59 PM)
(singing) "If Dems ruled the world...Each day would be the first day of Spring.. ...)

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125