justheather -> RE: Sexual Masochism...A Disorder? (10/11/2006 1:18:01 PM)
|
Well, I'd be interested in knowing if this means I can use it as excuse to call off from work. "Im sorry, I can't come in today. My sexual masochism is really acting up. I should be able to make it in next week." I am not really all that surprised or offended by the idea that the Psychological Community still classifies masochism as a disorder. Up until very recent times, homesexuality was considered a disorder. People who study and practice psychology use a certain kind of model in order to view the human population. In order to make what they do work, they have to be able to fit people into this model. So, following their "model", whatever deviates from what is considered "the norm" and causes a person enough distress that they seek out counsel from a psychologist, is labeled a "disorder". Not so much because it is "abnormal" "sick" or "wrong" but because it causes a person distress and inhibits his or her ability to function in his or her assorted societal roles. In other words, if I have these thoughts, feelings and ideas and they inhibit my ability to live a well-adapted and healthy life, then I have, according to the model, a disorder which, through treatment (which may or may not be "kink friendly"), I can find a way to either integrate these thoughts and feelings into my life and be at peace (my personal recommendation) or change my thought patterns so that I am not experiencing the troubling thoughts and feelings and therefore feel "ok" (I dont know that this works with kink, but Im not a pro, just my opinion). Likewise, if Im not upset by them and I don't show any maladaptive behaviors as a result of them, then they aren't a disorder because Ive not sought or been referred for treatment as a result of these traits under the psychologist's model. All is right with the world and Im still my kinky self. And the article linked to in the OP does state that the requirements for being diagnosed with this disorder include that "This causes clinically important distress or impairs work, social or personal functioning". So, I guess what Im saying is that it's a shame that the label "disorder" has been slapped onto masochism, but really if you view it in context, it's not such a horrible thing if it's only being used to identify an area in a person's life that is causing dis-ease and dis-order as opposed to being looked at as something that "needs to be fixed" wherever it is found. If someone is engaging in extremely risky behavior and/or is unable to function in society, I would wonder if there wasnt something going on other than "sexual masochism disorder". I realize that it is likely that most psychologists do not share my view. Im just presenting my take on why it could be ok for something to be considered a "disorder" in a particular context. Much like Western medical science, the practice of Psychology offers one model for viewing a person's psyche and for treating dis-ease. There are, thankfully, many other models under which the human experience can be explored. And I know it isnt my line, but I feel compelled to add: Just my opinion. Could be wrong. There ya go.
|
|
|
|