RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!!

RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

mnottertail -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 3:09:26 AM)
Oh, you ain't been around much, have you kid? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. But this shit out here is more TWUE and WEAW and (tada) GEN-U-WINE than the psychic hotline. You just can't get this kinda shit on TV. I am twuely sorry this hasn't turned into a bigger shit-slinger than it has............... Ron the Recalcitrant

Level -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 3:10:00 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: gypsylee this is the most stupid thread i've ever come across. It's crazy is what it is, craaaazy. It could even be bananas.

ShiftedJewel -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 3:57:34 AM)
*adaddysgirl... you have now become what you fought so hard against...* quote: She speaks against passive aggressive, yet that is what she is. She even stated that she would be covert in her proclamations against another. With the exception that you are not covert by any means. There is a fine line between believing in and stating your own personal opinion and becoming abusive with it. You have crossed that line. Erin is an incredible person and in taking her opinions and abusing others with it is just plain wrong. There is no love lost between juliaocean/Sinergy and my family and being totally honest here, I have absolutely no respect for either one of them... truth be known they would most likely say the same about me and mine. None of us lose sleep over it. But some of your posts have stepped way over the line. You dislike or disrespect them? Then debate what they say in an adult manner, don't resort to name calling and accusations. They are not the "bullys" here, you are. And just as you said about the usage of "twue".... your bullying and little "I am the police and you are banned" crap ceased being funny a long time ago. Nothing passive-aggressive about me... I don't call a spade a spade hon... I call it a fucking shovel. Amazingly enough you have gone from having my respect at the beginning of this thread to the same catagory... and dangerously close to the block column... as the ones you claimed to be pissed off about at the ass end of this same thread.... You have called people names, you have implied their lack of intelligence, you have bashed them solely based on their age... perhaps there is something to be said about the finesse jo uses in her passive-aggressive approach... it took months for me to form a serious dislike of her... it only took you a few days. Passive aggressive is ugly... but so is outwordly open aggression. I would offer a suggestion... if you wish to be taken seriously I would recommend stepping back and evaluating what it is that you hoped to accomplish in posting to this thread. *Jewel*

ExSteelAgain -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 4:05:18 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Mavis i missed the definitions thread... but wanted to help out the Elmer Fuddians a bit. There is a way to select "Elmer Fudd" as the default language for google results.. the following link will only show an example, not re-set Y/you default language. http://www.google.com/language_tools?hl=xx-elmer To actually make the selection, click on "Language Tools" near "Preferences" or if Y/you have the Fuddian google up.. click on "Wanguage Toows" near "Pweferences". Notes, there is also a Klingon version. Google people have too much time on their hands. Should send them invites to CM. I went there and it is hilarious. LOL

gypsylee -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 4:18:03 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Oh, you ain't been around much, have you kid? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. well. i have actually. on Australian forums tho.

becca333 -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 4:33:22 AM)
Thanks to the OP for explaining the 'twue' thing, and the reason for all those stray w's. When I saw a few posts using them I thought Elmer Fudd had joined this site. And that's not a pretty thought - I mean, Bugs Bunny would be ok. Daffy Duck I could understand - but Elmer? Nooooo way.

KatyLied -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 4:36:21 AM)
quote: i won't respond to that as i do not want to be derogatory. i am intelligent and do get things...when they are explained in an intelligent manner. LOL

adaddysgirl -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 4:42:37 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ShiftedJewel *adaddysgirl... you have now become what you fought so hard against...* With the exception that you are not covert by any means. There is a fine line between believing in and stating your own personal opinion and becoming abusive with it. You have crossed that line. Erin is an incredible person and in taking her opinions and abusing others with it is just plain wrong. There is no love lost between juliaocean/Sinergy and my family and being totally honest here, I have absolutely no respect for either one of them... truth be known they would most likely say the same about me and mine. None of us lose sleep over it. But some of your posts have stepped way over the line. You dislike or disrespect them? Then debate what they say in an adult manner, don't resort to name calling and accusations. They are not the "bullys" here, you are. And just as you said about the usage of "twue".... your bullying and little "I am the police and you are banned" crap ceased being funny a long time ago. Nothing passive-aggressive about me... I don't call a spade a spade hon... I call it a fucking shovel. Amazingly enough you have gone from having my respect at the beginning of this thread to the same catagory... and dangerously close to the block column... as the ones you claimed to be pissed off about at the ass end of this same thread.... You have called people names, you have implied their lack of intelligence, you have bashed them solely based on their age... perhaps there is something to be said about the finesse jo uses in her passive-aggressive approach... it took months for me to form a serious dislike of her... it only took you a few days. Passive aggressive is ugly... but so is outwordly open aggression. I would offer a suggestion... if you wish to be taken seriously I would recommend stepping back and evaluating what it is that you hoped to accomplish in posting to this thread. *Jewel* Jewel, From the first day i came on here, i saw the catty undertones Julia used in her responses. i even stopped reading her posts because of it. All it does is bait people....and she knows that. As a matter of fact, she just did the same thing (to me) on another thread i was posting on. That P-A stuff all seems so innocent but everyone knows it's not. Well, i am not P-A....and i am not going to sit back and be talked about through innuendo. If i see undertones like that again (toward me), i am definitely going to respond....my way....and not with that P-A baloney. And i am going to save the posts so if i ever get moderated i can show them what i was responding to. i see that others have started new threads out of their frustration with her (not just Erin either). i will not do that. i will address the issue right then and there. As i have said, i come on here to engage in intelligent conversation....and hopefully learn a few things along the way. When someone doesn't agree with me, they can say that, hopefully with some kind of respect, as i would give them. But these catty innuendos are just for the birds. And i really did not intend to attack anyone else here but again, if someone responds to something i say in a disrespectful way, either overtly or covertly, then i am going to respond to that in kind. BTW....i was the Humor Police due to a post where Catize appointed me and Erin that....so again, i responded accordingly. i am going to post an apology to Erin and then be done with this thread. i think i've said enough already, don't you? DG

adaddysgirl -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 4:46:38 AM)
Erin, i want to apologize to you for ruining your thread. i wish you the best with it....and hope you get some resolve out of the issue. i will not be posting on this one again. i do believe i have said enough already. Again, my apologies. DG [sm=hello.gif]

gypsylee -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 4:55:44 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: adaddysgirl Erin, i want to apologize to you for ruining your thread. i wish you the best with it....and hope you get some resolve out of the issue. i will not be posting on this one again. i do believe i have said enough already. Again, my apologies. DG [sm=hello.gif] aww. i was just getting into it actually. debating a stupid use of language is just boring, but a bitch-fest...

ShiftedJewel -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 5:01:18 AM)
These threads and the thoughts posted are nothing more then words on a screen, you alone can decide whether or not they affect you. They can, and often do, teach and there have been many insightful thoughts posted on these boards, even from people we lack respect for. But for the most part the one thing you learn from posting here is who you would and would NOT like to have sitting in your livingroom at some point simply because of their behavior here. Again, there is a fine line.... quote: And i really did not intend to attack anyone else here but again, if someone responds to something i say in a disrespectful way, either overtly or covertly, then i am going to respond to that in kind. At what point does it become to much? When does repaying disrespect with more disrespect do anything other then disrupt what could otherwise be a wonderful conversation? And at what point does "covert" translate into paranoia? To ruin a decent online reputation because one is offended by the words on a screen from an anonymous individual when the block button is so readily available makes no sense to me. It takes a strong person to stand and fight for what they believe in, but it takes and even stronger person to walk away from absolute futility. I personally couldn't give a rats ass what some people think about me and the fact that in my eyes they are disrespectful to me or mine doesn't affect me at all. Having raised way too many kids I am capable of ignoring damn near anything. I do know when to check myself to avoid sinking to the level of those I feel have stepped beyond reasonable adult conversation (not that I always do). It's a skill many would do well to practice. *Jewel*

mnottertail -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 5:04:39 AM)
Hewwo, and wewcome to Ewmew WaGasse-- Live! Today we will be making BitchFestCweowe... Fiwst we wiww saute gawic with wemowse and wesentment. Bam!!! Bam!!! Bam!!! Wet's kick it up a notch , shaww we?

gypsylee -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 5:07:40 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Hewwo, and wewcome to Ewmew WaGasse-- Live! Today we will be making BitchFestCweowe... Fiwst we wiww saute gawic with wemowse and wesentment. Bam!!! Bam!!! Bam!!! Wet's kick it up a notch , shaww we? ahahah. ehehhe. ahah. heehee. heh. snowt such a scawwywag.

Iskander -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 5:20:55 AM)
Aine did not give you disrespect initially, I didn't.. so it's hardly responding in kind... But anyway, it's all moot.. Bye... Iskander...

gypsylee -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 5:26:35 AM)
Hey - man you talkin' back to me? (Take him out) You gotta keep 'em separated Hey - man you disrespecting me? (Take him out) You gotta keep 'em separated Come out and play adaddysgirl!

KatyLied -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 5:27:10 AM)
quote: But anyway, it's all moot.. Bye... We can hope it's moot. Many times people promise (or threaten) to leave a thread. Only to be see a few posts later. I've never figured out why they do that, unless it's a call for attention so people will beg them to stay.

mnottertail -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 5:32:54 AM)
Well, I'M fweakin' stayin'............ We ain't begun to pick all the scabs yet.......... (Large Piss shiver..............oooooooooooowwwwwwwwhhhhhhhhhhhhooooooooo) Gawd, I love this town!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ron

Level -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 5:40:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: gypsylee Hey - man you talkin' back to me? (Take him out) You gotta keep 'em separated Hey - man you disrespecting me? (Take him out) You gotta keep 'em separated Come out and play adaddysgirl! The Offspring called, they want their lyrics back [;)]

becca333 -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 5:45:23 AM)
Reading this thread is like getting stoned and watching tennis. Er, I mean, I imagine that it is....

Emperor1956 -> RE: It's true NOT "twue"!!!! (10/15/2006 5:45:49 AM)
I teach negotiation strategy and theory, and this thread (without, sadly, the Fuddisms) could be in my textbook. Did you all notice what happened here (in part)? The "wolfpack" theory in full display. One person attacks another, usually believing she is in a position of safety within her group (the wolfpack). When the attacker perceives (wrongly, in this case) that another individual agrees, he/she tries to coopt that second person to add numbers to the attack. If the second individual doesn't distance from the attack, the pack grows (Iskander immediately disavowed the attempt to coopt him). So the coopt attempt fails. Often, another member of the pack will come rushing in, often to pour platitudes on the group ("Why can't we all get along?") or to sew more discontent through threats and nasty statements. But the new pack member's strategy is really to divert attention while the original wolfpack member scrambles to safety. "Wolfpackers" are considered dangerous in group negotiations because they destroy fledgling alliances and sow discontent. They rarely venture out alone, because they are deeply insecure and afraid to express themselves until they are sure there are members of the group that support them. Ironically, it often turns out that wolfpackers don't care WHAT the issue is -- they just love to engender controversy from their perceived "safe haven" (Ron would call them "shit stirrers" and he'd be right). Wolfpackers are common in bullying situations -- I've been part of efforts to diffuse bullying at the jr. high and high school level, and usually the chief bully will have her or his "packers" around. Wolfpackers also undermine hostage and other sensitive negotiations. Other wolfpack behavior involves making sweeping generalizations to support an unsupportable view, attacking newcomers to the situation who appear to have an affinity with the "other side" (note what happened to Aine when she posted?) and most notably, ad hominem attacks on individuals in the group (like the vicious attacks on Julia and Sinergy). Wolfpackers are usually successfully isolated by the group in groups that want to get something done. I don't know if that works in "online" and I'm not sure CM boards "want to get anything done". By the way, the other example I use in classes to illustrate the "wolfpack" is a gaggle of 12 - 13 year old girls "dissing" a person outside their clique, and I'd say the "wolfpackers" on here are just about as mature. E.

Page: << < prev 9 10 [11] 12 13 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875