Gauge -> RE: NFL Sob (or Brag) Thread (3/22/2015 9:35:13 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kdsub Yea we heard that too... now does that really may sense to you? Bradford and Foles have similar statistics with Foles a little bit better. Foles salary for next year is around 1.5 million where Bradford's is 13 million. Now if a team was interested in trading a draft position for a quarterback why not trade the better prospect instead of going through all this? Otherwise Foles could have been traded for the draft pick with more upside than Bradford. Anyway ...I know a few quarterbacks step right into NFL systems and work quite well but this is the exception rather than the rule... To me , what do i know, but it seems foolish to draft Mariota and expect him to step in and run a pro offense.... I can't believe this is his plan. Butch Butch, I am right there with you. I didn't understand why you trade for Bradford and lose Foles and give up a few draft picks in the process... frankly, no one understands it. It would seem to me that packaging Foles with draft picks to move up in the draft would have been the better option. That said, none of the sports writers or analysts in Philly here believe that Chip Kelly is done with his moves. If he is, Kelly has big brass balls and he had better be right or he is out of town and the Eagles are sitting there looking mighty stupid. If we get Mariota, and we have to give up a lot to get him, a few first round picks over the next few years and maybe a player or two, then he is going to have to step right into this offense and produce, and we both know that is a longshot but not unheard of in this league. Time will tell.
|
|
|
|