LadyHugs
Posts: 2299
Joined: 1/1/2004 Status: offline
|
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen; I had a slave contact me upon reading this thread but, hasn't posted on it, unless the chap has another alias. That said, this chap was upset by my use of 'networking.' He went on with a lot of assumptions of what kind of networking I do; so I am here to clarify what type of networking I do and mean. In networking with other dominants, I may have knowledge of a slave who is seeking. However, when asking around other dominants, I do not mention that there is a slave seeking, nor any conversation I had with a slave who contacted me. If I know of a dominant that might be a better 'fit'/'match' I advise the slave they 'may' wish to contact Dominant A, B or C. It is up to that slave to contact Dominant A, B or C. Apparently this chap thinks, a dominant like me would spill the intimate and confidential information and such. I don't. Networking is a tool as to make/create connections. Unfortunately, I have to agree with the chap, that some dominants do go pass the boundary of private and or confidential conversations and such but, again--I am one who dislikes being included in the mass of misbehaviors by another class/group of individuals. Another thing this chap doesn't know about me. I ask first, if it is ok to ask around as to find a better match. If I don't have permission, the matter is dead then and there. I will not make any inquiries. But, I am willing to help a slave if he asks me to seek out those I know who may be looking for a slave like them. But, it is with their permission and knowledge I do such. Networking, is a tool in this lifestyle. I use it more for finding resources, such as clothing, events, supplies, people's input on conventions and or gatherings, as to know if it is worthwhile to attend or let it go, as it isn't addressing interests I have. Gossip, as this chap seems to believe is what Dominant women call 'networking' is not networking--it is Gossip. Respectfully submitted for consideration, Lady Hugs
|