TallDarkAndWitty
Posts: 1893
Joined: 6/12/2004 From: Rochester, NY Status: offline
|
Oh goody...a play mate!!! (And I mean that seriously, I love the back and forth of internet debate.) quote:
ORIGINAL: SirTyson quote:
Did a mojority of people agree on the definitions as penned by Noah Webster? That very much sound to me like you are implying they were his definitions, and they weren't. They were words that already had meaning just being used improperly or pronounced differently. I used the word "penned" for a reason. If I had said he "wrote" them, it would be possible to confuse my meaning and assume I was suggesting that he invented the definitions himself (which, funny enough, happened anyway). As I hope you understand now, I was saying Webster simply put to paper the most common definitions for words as he knew them at the time. You can't possibly think he knew all uses of all words, or that he even knew all words, can you? The man made liberal edits and sometimes made shit up...*smile* That is why people who write dictionaries write them...they love the power. quote:
quote:
Nor did I ever suggest that we make up words to describe the roles in BDSM. Ok, lets look at one of your earlier posts... quote:
If there wasn't a word that described what they did, they wouldn't use an already existing word and have it mean something else. They would use a combination of other words, or they would create a new word. So you are contradicting yourself now? You are confusing my pronouns. The "we" in the more recent post refers to the authors of the BDSM dictionary. The "they" in the earlier post refers to those who feel they have something for which there is not already a term. In other words, if someone shows up who likes to have leaves insterted anally, and there isn't a word to describe their fetish, they can make one up. If that word gets into use by enough people, a dictionary writer may choose to include that word in the next edition of his dictionary. The dictionary author doesn't make words up, but people do. quote:
quote:
So having no definitions is going to make them feel welcome? I not having definitions or trying to label people and telling them that those words or what you make them, what you and your Dom/Domme...Sub/Slave..agree upon. Huh? I am not really sure what you are saying, but I will respoond with the following: Dictionaries don't label people. People label people. Dictionaries are tools by which label can be more accurate and useful, but they don't assign words to people. Two people in a room can agree to call themselves Tom and Jerry for all I care, but if they do it on an Internet message board, they better not hope people know what they mean. I, for one, like to be understood. I like to use words with a precision that most do not appreciate (as shown in the "penned" example above). I would like a reference book which shows the same care and precision...it does not currently exist. I suppose I will have to write it myself. Taggard
< Message edited by TallDarkAndWitty -- 2/2/2005 7:43:43 AM >
_____________________________
A most rewarding compliment is an insult from the ill-informed. My slave: Kat (RainaVerene on the other side) and her website: RainaVerene.com
|