LordODiscipline -> RE: home for abused subs and slaves (1/31/2005 8:22:54 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: thnkiwntaspank Not surprisingly, you misunderstood what I said. Ok it is always possible, I am lysdexic some times. quote:
I indicated that these women most certainly could, and if necessary SHOULD escape to a safe house in their community. I discussed both possibilities. quote:
But, like it or not, while yes they are physically/mentally abused, no matter what the circumstances, the context in which the abuse has occurred is far beyond the capabilities or understanding of the counselors at an "ordinary" women's shelter. The counselors at such a place are typically abuse survivors, and these women would have a great deal of difficulty understanding that type of situation. Having worked with that community in the past, I can assure you of this fact. They deal with abuse - is it such a stretch to think that they would be knowledgeable about abuse and consensual behavior... but, then again - they are not there to judge these women (I thought that was the credo - do not judge their lives, assist them)? quote:
My suggestion that if someone knew of a situation where abuse was occurring to offer a "safe" place for them to go invalidates your arguments about the monitary needs almost entirely. So - no money is required to run such a place, to incorporate it as a non-profit or to pay the people who are on as councelors, to feed the people, to lend them the necessary clothing or money to get on their feet again? quote:
Most decent people, presented with this type of situation would help a friend in need for the amount of time it would take to help the abused get back on their feet. I seldom depend on the kindness of strangers... and, the need always exceeds the resources as you would know being involved in such an endeavor in the past. quote:
My suggestion was that people within that IMMEDIATE community step up to assist, not some type of nationwide clearinghouse. The "clearinghouse' idea was a means of consolidation to assure the support of the community would not exceed the many places that would be required should it be set up as individual places in most major population areas. That it is not your consideration of this point, indicates an unrealisitic expectation that there are: 1. enough of these abused peoples out there to make it worthwhile nationwide in individual houses in all major population centers (and, no demographics with any validity to support this), and, 2. That the 'deep pockets' that would allegedly support the endeavor are bottomless. That seems a bit irrational. quote:
As for the lack of cooberating evidence regarding abuse in situations such as this...Considering the fact that at any given time, one of these women might have bruises or marks on them, you are right that it would be hard to distinguish between those that are consented to and those that are not. I was referring to the sensational stories that all web sites are rife with - and, when the salient questions are asked as to what police station, what news paper, what mortuary might be contacted to cooberate the story - are suddenty met with silence and excuse. The soap opera of the internet churns out many great stories. quote:
However, the only other person likely to be able to cooberate the consent or lack thereof is not likely to step forward, as they are likely to be the abuser. Under the domestic voilence laws in 39 states consentuality is not a consideration for any marks found on a person - so cooberation is a simple polaroid and a police report. quote:
In a "no limits" Master/slave relationship, who gets to decide what is abuse? The idiotic idiom "no-limits" has no relational value to abuse when it crosses the threshold of damage that is non-consensual. When someone leaves such a relationship, they have decided what is abuse defacto and despite these "no-limit" rules, nes pas. So - it has not relational value in this discussion. quote:
Aside from the link which mistoferin provided, any counseling which this victim is going to receive is going to be counseling to help her learn self-esteem and understand that love does not involve any kind of violence. We preach that 'love' (another loaded statement) may include violence... what is the hypocracy of this contrarian rhetoric on this forum? quote:
Is this my personal belief? No, but it is the belief of 99.99% of the counselors that they would come in contact with, as those counselors are not schooled in the BDSM lifestyle or what it means other than it is a psycho/sexual deviance created out of self esteem issues and childhood traumas. Gotcha... perhaps that is what they need if this did not work for them then. But, the fact is - you would still need KAPs to be in place for this venture. Otherwise, these people would have to suffice for the emotional triage involved. quote:
If you can find acceptable college or doctorate level textbooks and studies that indicate otherwise, I would be very surprised. there are more than a few KAPs that can provide such references and papers - there are quite a few out there. quote:
As for your "theory" regarding the potential for criminal charges once the victim leaves the area? Totally baseless. This was based ont he national 'clearinghouse' theory of operation for this place. Leave the area of domicile and you cannot press charges without being there again. And, if you are to get these people help - and, they are out of the area, then you would have them return? Seems pretty shakey therapy to me. quote:
Leaving the area does not prohibit anyone from filing the necessary charges against the perpetrator of a crime. So you can file a charge in California from Arizona? quote:
And just for your personal knowledge, when someone is aware of a crime being committed and takes no action, in most states, that is also considered a crime called misprision of felony. If we are talking felony consipiracy, it requires foreknowledge of intent and/or an attempt to cover up the crime afterwards. quote:
Everyone might also like to think about the fact that if these women do start to go to the authorities regarding abuse, the BDSM scene is going to start getting a great deal of publicity, none of it good. So - the effort them is not to protect these people, but to engender more through the non-reporting of the perpetrator, leaving them on the street in order to assure that they have more opportunity to persue their victim and/or find another one? quote:
If efforts within the community are made to protect and help the victims, the situations will be resolved in a manner that will not cause upheaval to all. It is not unusual for groups to "self-police" themselves when outside involvement might bring turmoil to the groups beliefs. name one time that this has been done effectively and with assurance of no recitivism on the perpetrator's part and absolute assurance for the victim. I have heard this argued before... it is nonsense. quote:
In a situation such as described in this post, how long would the abusive master be able to function once word got around about what he was? With the advent of the internet? Forever. Change your name and simply find someone else. ~J
|
|
|
|