Level
Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sinergy quote:
ORIGINAL: Level I don't understand, that's why I put "side" in parentheses , though when you say "Marxist", it gives me ideas. So you have studied Marxist philosophy? Nope, not yet. Or are you like one of those people who lump his philosophies in with those damn Communists that ran the USSR, Red China, North Vietnam, and Kampuchea? I use those 4 countries because the United States government called them all Communists, vilified them for being Communists, feared they would all join into a big Red Menace and take over the world, and all of them had completely different forms of governments in charge of their country. Actually, they called themselves communists, as well, it's not something America made up. And I do know they were different styles of governments. Not to mention that these governments all hated or feared the other so-called "Communist" governments. The Chinese reds called the Vietnamese the "Cubans of the Orient", which amuses me. Weird. Now we have similar rhetoric spewing from the White House about Islam, as if there is any sort of connection between the Islam practiced in Indonesia and the Islam practiced in Iran. Are you referring to the "Islamic fascists" stuff? Because those kind of murderous idiots do exist in differing Islamic communities.... although you're right in that there are different sects of Islam, the Sufis are some interesting ones. Calling something a name like Communism or Marxism does not really signify understanding of the subject matter. What was done throughout most of the cold war was to attach emotional rhetoric (and I mean the bad kind, not the sort of rhetoric that an skilled and intelligent orator like Thomas Jefferson or Andrew Jackson would present) to a word and then villify those who identify with that word. Agreed, which is one reason I'd like to hear julia's ideas, as she calls herself a Marxist, that can mean different things. I, for one, would be really interested to hear you provide a coherent synopsis of juliaoceania's "side," but I doubt you will even attempt it. There are subjects which a categorization of sound bites from Rush Limbaugh would fail to really elucidate. As I said to julia, I don't really know or understand her "side", thus my encouragement of her stating her views. I was genuine in that. If I had to guess, it's a combination of a redistrubution of wealth, universal healthcare, and a reverence of nature as a sort of lifeblood for the human race. At least these are some items I've noted that she seems to care about. Certainly, I could be wrong, and am waiting to see if that's so. Now the rest of your post, Sinergy, reeks of snottiness and ignorance. If all you've gotten out of my posts are that I'm a blind acolyte of anyone, much less Rush Limbaugh, you really need to brush up on your reading skills. Just me, etc. Sinergy
_____________________________
Fake the heat and scratch the itch Skinned up knees and salty lips Let go it's harder holding on One more trip and I'll be gone ~~ Stone Temple Pilots
|