Why did the republicans, YO! look pls

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

Why did the republicans, YO! look pls

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Why did the republicans, YO! look pls

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Why did the republicans, YO! look pls - 11/21/2006 10:10:05 AM

pahunkboy

Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline

Has anyone noticed that the bush agenda never mentioned reversing Brady?

Why?

BTW- you may not own a hand gun, or taser, if you cant own a firearm, and it dont have to be a felony either.

Some of my best friends....had to go below ground.

Profile

Post #: 1

RE: Why did the republicans, YO! look pls - 11/21/2006 10:57:45 AM

popeye1250

Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline

Pahunk, and what is this all about?
You're not very clear about what you're talking about.

(in reply to pahunkboy)

Profile

Post #: 2

RE: Why did the republicans, YO! look pls - 11/21/2006 10:58:15 AM

Archer

Posts: 3207
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline

Because it was accepted as enough that tthe Attourny general started off the Bush presidency with a statement specificly sayng that they viewed the 2nd ammendment as an individual right not a collective one. It was enough of a bone for the gun rights folks so long as the Government was controled by Republicans no new restrictions would be enacted.

They also had moved to the instacheck system nation wide as part of the regulation and thus the wait period was eliminated, as well as the other sticking point of tossing the application information after 90 days from when the purchase was approved .

Administratively the big issues were handled.

< Message edited by Archer -- 11/21/2006 10:59:04 AM >

(in reply to pahunkboy)

Profile

Post #: 3

RE: Why did the republicans, YO! look pls - 11/21/2006 11:03:09 AM

pahunkboy

Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Pahunk, and what is this all about?
You're not very clear about what you're talking about.

they should dump the Brady bill. thats my opinion. it is too restrictive.

(in reply to popeye1250)

Profile

Post #: 4

RE: Why did the republicans, YO! look pls - 11/21/2006 11:05:32 AM

pahunkboy

Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Archer

Because it was accepted as enough that tthe Attourny general started off the Bush presidency with a statement specificly sayng that they viewed the 2nd ammendment as an individual right not a collective one. It was enough of a bone for the gun rights folks so long as the Government was controled by Republicans no new restrictions would be enacted.

They also had moved to the instacheck system nation wide as part of the regulation and thus the wait period was eliminated, as well as the other sticking point of tossing the application information after 90 days from when the purchase was approved .

Administratively the big issues were handled.

well then I guess we will see when I go to renew my fire arms license. they never asked for it back.

(in reply to Archer)

Profile

Post #: 5

RE: Why did the republicans, YO! look pls - 11/21/2006 1:16:14 PM

Lenis

Posts: 28
Joined: 7/22/2006
Status: offline

Brady has been allowed to sunset, at least the useless "Assualt Weapons Ban" has.

Also, even though a lot of republicans lost their seats, a lot of Democrats who were elected to take their place are very much pro-RKBA.

Its good to see that there are some out there that are pro-2nd on this sight. Me and my slave do not feel to alone now.

-Brian

(in reply to pahunkboy)

Profile

Post #: 6

RE: Why did the republicans, YO! look pls - 11/21/2006 3:41:39 PM

popeye1250

Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Pahunk, and what is this all about?
You're not very clear about what you're talking about.

they should dump the Brady bill. thats my opinion. it is too restrictive.

Oh ok yes they should.
Also a "permit" for one state should be good for all states just like a driver's lisense.
As for needing "permits" to carry a gun they really should be done away with Nationwide.
I just don't think you should need a "permit" to excercise a right.
That's how they do it i Vermont. No "permit" needed.

Lenis, plenty of people in here are lisensed to carry just like any other group of people!

(in reply to pahunkboy)

Profile

Post #: 7

RE: Why did the republicans, YO! look pls - 11/21/2006 3:43:19 PM

michaelOfGeorgia