RE: JFK assasination 2nd gunman studied (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


seeksfemslave -> RE: JFK assasination 2nd gunman studied (11/23/2006 1:23:49 AM)

You should not casually claim as  fact that Ruby simply entered the Police Station willy nilly. When someone suspected of having committed a crime of this magnitude is being moved clearly the police station would have been closed down. It appears the responsible Dallas police actually did this, in that ALL entries were guarded.

Therefore the Warren commision was forced to conclude that one of the officers was mistaken when he said that no one entered past him during his watch.

Ruby was known to mix with rogue elements of the force and therefore he could have been and probably was smuggled in to the station. Unless of course Ruby had stayed in the station all night !




slaveaurora -> RE: JFK assasination 2nd gunman studied (11/23/2006 3:47:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

Slaveaurora:
You say that nothing about the assassination has been proven. It has been proven beyond any doubt whatsoever that the Warren report was I think you Americans say a "snow" job.  I don't agree with this.  It has not been "proven", however, there are many people who believe that the warren report is gospel, and there are just as many people who believe it was a complete snow job as you say.  It has never been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the warren report is right or wrong.   But everyone has their own opinions about whether it is right or wrong. 

It chose to emphasise from all the hearings and evidence only those facts that pointed to the conclusion it wanted to project. 
This I agree with.  I am one of the people that believe the warren report was/is totally false, and I think you hit the nail on the head with the above comment.
Whats more it used as investigative agencies those who subsequently came under suspicion of being involved. CIA/FBI.
This does NOT mean that say the whole of the CIA was involved. Just some "high up" elements making use of CIA resources,that is all that is required.
I can't argue this comment, there may very well be truth in it.
As an example of Warren Report selectivity,No credible evidence that shots were fired from the grassy knoll.
Totally untrue, Police Officer rides M/cycle towards the knoll. Plenty of film showing people pointing towards the knoll as a source of the shots..
I partially agree with you here.  There is no proof anywhere that shots were fired from the grassy knoll.  Absolutely, there is film of people pointing to the grassy knoll, people also said it came from the overpass, and some people said it came from the depository.   But the fact remains, no one knows "where" the shots came from for sure.  There is no solid proof.




slaveaurora -> RE: JFK assasination 2nd gunman studied (11/23/2006 3:53:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

slaveaurora:
You have completely missed the point about the first police bulletin broadcast describing a suspect that resembled Oswald.

It was necessary to carry out body counts in the Book Depository to establish who was or was not there AFTER the shooting.
This took time, at least half hour or so. It was before or at least suspiciously close to the time at which this count was completed that the bulliein was broadcast. Whats more Oswald was not the only person "missing"
In fact when one Police Officer entered the building he got someone to identify Oswald on the SECOND floor drinking a coke.

Oswald did return to his lodgings, change his jacket, so the description in the police bulletin should not have been accurate anyway, possibly pick up a gun and.......go to "MEET" Tippet. I dont know.


You are right about Oswald being found on the 2nd floor. 
You know I am not sure about that police bulletan, i am drawing a blank on that one... more digging I guess.  :)
 
I don't remember anything about him going back to his house to change clothes, and there are no solid facts pointing to him shooting Tippet.   
 
~it is not even 6am here....MORE COFFEE!~  lol
 




seeksfemslave -> RE: JFK assasination 2nd gunman studied (11/23/2006 9:59:42 AM)

Did Oswald return to his lodgings ?
Mrs Earlene Roberts , Oswald's landlady testified that at 1pm Dallas time Oswald returned to his lodgings and changed his clothes, thus at least confusing any description the Police may have been able to give of his appearance. She further testified that a Police car parked in front of her house, while Oswald was present and sounded its horn twice. How suspicious was that since not 15 mins later Oswald had his ill fated "meeting" with Tippet ?

This very significant info. was buried in the main body of the report.




seeksfemslave -> RE: JFK assasination 2nd gunman studied (11/23/2006 11:50:35 AM)

Another odd fact about the alleged assassination weapon, the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle. Only 4 pieces of ammunition were ever found that could be associated with it. 3 spent cases and one bullit still in the rifle when it was supposedly found on the 6th floor of the Book Depository.. So it seems that if Oswald did use the weapon he took with him only 4 pieces of ammunition, does that ring true. ?

No sales records could ever be found for ammunition and associated with Oswald, I believe due to its old age such ammunition was quite rare and only 1 or 2 dealers in the Dallas/Ft Worth area sold it. That suggests that someone may have supplied Oswald with the ammo.





seeksfemslave -> RE: JFK assasination 2nd gunman studied (11/23/2006 12:47:34 PM)

The rifle found on the 6th floor was initially identified as a German 7.65 mm Mauser and an affidavit was sworn to this affect by one of the Police Officers who discovered it.

I do not know when it changed to a Mannlicher-Carcano 6.5 mm but I would guess this happened when the authorities found they  could not tie Oswald to a Mauser, but they could associate him with a Mannlicher.

One important fact, stamped on the Rifle was Made in Italy 6.5 mm.
Wonder why the Police thought it was German ?
The obvious answer is that the Mannlicher was a plant.




Sinergy -> RE: JFK assasination 2nd gunman studied (11/23/2006 3:37:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

Another odd fact about the alleged assassination weapon, the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle. Only 4 pieces of ammunition were ever found that could be associated with it. 3 spent cases and one bullit still in the rifle when it was supposedly found on the 6th floor of the Book Depository.. So it seems that if Oswald did use the weapon he took with him only 4 pieces of ammunition, does that ring true. ?



I researched these because I wanted to get one for my father after his was stolen when I was a kid.  A Mannlicher rifle has a type of clip which holds 4 bullets.  Oswald may have just loaded it up somewhere else and not taken any extra ammunition with him.

Not saying I disagree with the other theories propounded in this thread, just saying that 3 shell cases and 1 bullet in the rifle makes sense for that type of weapon.  If he fired 3 shots...

Sinergy




seeksfemslave -> RE: JFK assasination 2nd gunman studied (11/24/2006 1:37:39 AM)

Sinergy explains that the Mannlicher "holds" 4 bullets....
Not saying I disagree with the other theories propounded in this thread, just saying that 3 shell cases and 1 bullet in the rifle makes sense for that type of weapon.  If he fired 3 shots...

Sounds reasonable but... of all the thorough? searches of Oswalds property/background  no other ammo or sales slips for ammo was ever found. No dealer of the ammo identified Oswald as having bought any. So Oswald trotted off to kill the President carrying the barest minimum of hardware to do the job. Does that ring true? I suppose you could say he realised he would have to leave the scene pretty damn quick but then you are faced with the problem that he, Oswald, was seen idly drinking coke on the 2nd floor only 2 or 3 mins. after the shooting. This is recorded in the Warren Report I believe.

All very odd eh ?




LTRsubNW -> RE: JFK assasination 2nd gunman studied (11/24/2006 1:45:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subfever

Lincoln too:

http://www.prolognet.qc.ca/clyde/pres.htm


Interestingly, I'm sure most have now heard the oft repeated connections between Lincoln and Kennedy...such as Kennedy's secretary was Mrs. Lincoln, Lincoln actually had a mistress named Eunice Shriver.

And one I'm not sure that has ever been well publicized but, Kennedy also played with Lincoln logs as a child.

Coincidence?

(I think not).




slaveaurora -> RE: JFK assasination 2nd gunman studied (11/24/2006 6:01:27 AM)

quote:

Did Oswald return to his lodgings ?
Mrs Earlene Roberts , Oswald's landlady testified that at 1pm Dallas time Oswald returned to his lodgings and changed his clothes, thus at least confusing any description the Police may have been able to give of his appearance. She further testified that a Police car parked in front of her house, while Oswald was present and sounded its horn twice. How suspicious was that since not 15 mins later Oswald had his ill fated "meeting" with Tippet ?


I looked into this a bit more, and you are right.  Oswald did in fact go home and at the very least changed his jacket, and possibly his t-shirt.
 
Earline Roberts did say that a police car pulled up out front and honked it's horn while Oswald was there.  However the number she said was on the side of the car, was later found not to be a number within the police department...in other words it was not a lagitament police vehicle.   There is some speculation as to how credible a witness Earline Roberts was, and some say that she was into the fame of it all. 
 
quote:

The rifle found on the 6th floor was initially identified as a German 7.65 mm Mauser and an affidavit was sworn to this affect by one of the Police Officers who discovered it.

I do not know when it changed to a Mannlicher-Carcano 6.5 mm but I would guess this happened when the authorities found they  could not tie Oswald to a Mauser, but they could associate him with a Mannlicher.

One important fact, stamped on the Rifle was Made in Italy 6.5 mm.
Wonder why the Police thought it was German ?
The obvious answer is that the Mannlicher was a plant.


The rifle initally found was thought to be a Mauser by the officer that first found it-this was before it was picked up and removed from the scene.   Once they did remove it, and upon further inspection, they realized it was in fact a Mannlicher-Carcano.  The officer who first found it laying at the scene mistakenly identified it as the Mauser.
 
The Mannlicher was not a plant, it was the gun that was used to kill Kennedy.  
As for the ammo... I don't know... Master says that that ammo is not all that rare, and in fact is pretty common.  He also says that while he is not positive, the gun did hold a clip, and he "thinks" that any size clip could have been used.  Why there was only 4 bullets, I don't know...
 
quote:

You should not casually claim as  fact that Ruby simply entered the Police Station willy nilly. When someone suspected of having committed a crime of this magnitude is being moved clearly the police station would have been closed down. It appears the responsible Dallas police actually did this, in that ALL entries were guarded.

Therefore the Warren commision was forced to conclude that one of the officers was mistaken when he said that no one entered past him during his watch.

Ruby was known to mix with rogue elements of the force and therefore he could have been and probably was smuggled in to the station. Unless of course Ruby had stayed in the station all night !



Jack Ruby was friends with several police officers, and many of them routinly visited his club.   There is on record that one of the police officers questioned stated that he did not see Ruby walk into the police station, that maybe his back was turned at the time.   
It is also documented that Ruby was in fact at the Western Union minutes before arriving at the station to wire money to one of his employees, a stripper I believe.  There is a receipt from the Western Union to prove this, complete with the time on it.  
It is possible that Ruby did casually walk into the police station undetected, there were tons of press there, and it seems feasable to me that he could have gotten in without question, especially since he was friends with many of the officers.
I don't think he planned to kill Oswald that day, but it has been said, that Oswald walked out with a grin on his face, and this caused Ruby to "snap" and he shot him.  
 
Had Ruby planned to kill Oswald that day, it makes sense to me that he would have arrived at the station at the original time Oswald was to be moved - remember his departing the station was delayed, and Ruby would not have known that.
 
Sir...  I have to ask if you are familiar with the Education forum?   There is much info there about Kennedy's assasination by people who "know"...    
 
Master has an entire directory on this computer dedicated to Kennedy, complete with tons of pictures from that day, and many documents.    In fact we were looking at some of them last night, and there are pics of the gun.    
 
~aurora~




seeksfemslave -> RE: JFK assasination 2nd gunman studied (11/24/2006 8:05:40 AM)

A couple more points about Ruby...
It is well recorded that Ruby was devastated by the Kennedy killing and took an intense not to say morbid interest  in it. He took the view that it was required the something be done and he might well do it.
The time of the Oswald transfer was made public against the advice of some Police officers and a method of movement not exposing Oswald to the gaze of anyone in the police station was rejected.
It is to be expected therefore that Ruby would make every effort to be present as Oswald was moved and so he did but curiously enough he turned up at the actual transfer time not the announced time.
Is that suspicious ?

Also the actual transfer was botched in the sense that no Police cordon existed and the transfer car was not ready.
Is that suspicious ?

Also I have read claims that a car horn sounded then the ranking Police Officer gave the signal to start the transfer.
Is that suspicious ?

There is also a witness, N Daniels, who claimed to have seen a man,resembling Ruby, enter the station via a ramp. This man was clocked ie observed, but not challenged by the guarding Police Officer.
Is that suspicious ?




seeksfemslave -> RE: JFK assasination 2nd gunman studied (11/24/2006 8:14:07 AM)

Regarding the ID of the rifle it was claimed for some time after the Kennedy killing, at least 1 or 2 days to be a Mauser. This was not some odd error quickly corrected, the view that it was a Mauser was solid. In fact a Mauser is almost  certainly the weapon that was found on the 6th floor.




Sinergy -> RE: JFK assasination 2nd gunman studied (11/24/2006 5:10:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

Sinergy explains that the Mannlicher "holds" 4 bullets....
Not saying I disagree with the other theories propounded in this thread, just saying that 3 shell cases and 1 bullet in the rifle makes sense for that type of weapon.  If he fired 3 shots...

Sounds reasonable but... of all the thorough? searches of Oswalds property/background  no other ammo or sales slips for ammo was ever found. No dealer of the ammo identified Oswald as having bought any. So Oswald trotted off to kill the President carrying the barest minimum of hardware to do the job. Does that ring true? I suppose you could say he realised he would have to leave the scene pretty damn quick but then you are faced with the problem that he, Oswald, was seen idly drinking coke on the 2nd floor only 2 or 3 mins. after the shooting. This is recorded in the Warren Report I believe.

All very odd eh ?


I am not disagreeing that it seems odd.

I posted elsewhere the scientific principle of Occams Razor.  What Occams Razor basically states is that one should avoid multiplying entities.  Or, in other words, the simplest solution is usually correct.

I was simply stating that 3 shells and one bullet means the clip on the rifle was full.

We dont know where he got the rifle from.  It might have been provided to him by the Salvation Army or the Peace Corp, but here is the first example of entity multiplication.  Maybe he owned the rifle for 25 years after it was given to him by a friend.  We dont know.

Oswald was a marine sniper.  Snipers live or die for one shot.  Why would he need 200 bullets for a shot at a moving vehicle?

I will state this one more time.  I am not defending the Warren Report.  I am simply having difficulty with the reasons presented here as to why there was a conspiracy.
There are simple explanations for many of these reasons that dont have to involve Marvin The Martian or the Tooth Fairy.

Conspiracies live or die based on the ability of all participants to keep their mouths shut.  2 people have a much easier time than 2000 to keep things under their hat.

Some things which happen in life simply seem odd. 

Sinergy




mnottertail -> RE: JFK assasination 2nd gunman studied (11/24/2006 5:19:29 PM)

Before the mauser contraversy gets too far afield:

http://www.chuckhawks.com/old_mausers.htm

The mauser action has been the staple of many guns throughout the world and in being  so, have been collectively referred to as mausers just like the american CRESENT wrench, which is not always (in fact rarely nowadays) made by cresent (adjustable spanner to brits)

Ron




Sinergy -> RE: JFK assasination 2nd gunman studied (11/24/2006 5:36:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveaurora

He also says that while he is not positive, the gun did hold a clip, and he "thinks" that any size clip could have been used.  Why there was only 4 bullets, I don't know...



The clip in a Mannlicher has 4 bullets in a box shaped clip inside the action, not a banana style clip such as you find in a AK-47.  I believe it ejects out the top when empty.  If a bullet is still in the clip it would not eject out.  It is not a rifle designed to have a variable size clip.

From what I understand, it is a fabulous deer (or sniper) rifle, and is actually a fairly common variety from World War 1 on.

The ammunition is fairly standard if you buy a 6.5mm or thereabout rifle bullet, although the more common rifle barrel size is 8mm.

Sinergy




feminboots -> RE: JFK assasination 2nd gunman studied (12/1/2006 2:56:54 PM)

I'm in TOTAL agreement with you!

Tracey




feminboots -> RE: JFK assasination 2nd gunman studied (12/1/2006 3:04:51 PM)

Ms jdtall,

Very interesting, if I may so!  You sound like 'quite a character' and I mean that sincerely!  It sounds like you may have some 'inside information!'  I am too young to remember "that day" but have been in the school book building in Dallas several times, very spooky.  Than again, reading Life magazine as a child in the 60's, and watching today's news can be very spooky.  I didn't want to go to school for a week after Kent State!
Good luck - I enjoyed reading your response and am VERY respectful and curious of the 'baby-boomers" who really know what's going on!

Sincerely,

Trace 




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125