RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message

somethndif -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 9:58:52 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

Breasts.....How important are they to you in regards to physical attraction?

To those men who would be so inclined to honor my request.....I am not interested in hearing in particular what "type" or "shape" of breasts you prefer....I am simply interested in the importance of it to your arousal when naked with your woman.

In other words,  If you have a preference for a particular type of breast, but your sub/slave/lover/whatever does not have the size and shape you ideally prefer, how much or little does it affect your arousal ----and/or does it turn you off to any extent?  If so...is it Alittle?  Some?  Not at all?  Alot?? 


Contrary to what appears to be American men's fixation with breasts, they have very little effect on my arousal.  I prefer average to smaller breasts, actually.  Larger breasts sag with age and, to me, become unattractive.  I do like sensitive nipples, though.  But I have been with women with very large breasts, and women with very, very small breasts.

What I really like are cunts and asses, but especially cunts.  I like to play with them, torture them and make them cum over and over, and make them squirt.  *grin*

Dan



Sinergy -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 10:06:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveMastery
It is the use/usability of the breast that arouses,

Was this more concise and to the point?


I will take a stab at this one.

My ex-wife nursed our unmentionables with her breasts.  So technically, these were fully functional mammary glands / breasts.  I did not particularly become aroused by the taste of breast milk, and her cup size went from C to double H during that time period.  I dont recall being more or less sexually aroused by her ballerina breasts moreso than the nose cones of a 747.

As Emperor said, I tend to be attracted to a person's mind and soul, more so than the equipment her genes provided her with.

Just me, could be wrong, etc.

Sinergy



Mercnbeth -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 10:14:09 AM)

quote:

Breasts.....How important are they to you in regards to physical attraction?


None.

And how shallow does that sound considering beth's "perfect" natural breasts? However, I'll defend my position.

Throughout the years of search, I've experienced a full range of body types. For me, almost from the beginning, the body was the least important consideration prior to trying to establish a relationship. Body appearance, by design, is transient. Stipulating to the truth of the saying; "If I stop looking - bury me!"; relationships, especially 'lifestyle' oriented require more on the emotional/mental side than the physical. Realizing this, nobody I met was ever excluded based upon physical appearance.

Actual experience proved my point. I found it virtually impossible to enjoy physical contact with a woman on a strictly 'vanilla' basis. Conversely, if a woman expressed interest in any form of lifestyle 'play' I can't recall any case where I wasn't interested due to body type.

If there is a problem with this attitude was that obviously it took more time. I didn't see it as a problem, but in an age where contacting, meeting, sessioning, and collaring can all occur on the same day; that attitude raised eyebrows.



DomKen -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 10:14:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

But, now; if you wanna ask if your butt looks to big, that's another thing entirely

One of the true joys of being in a Dom/sub relationship is never hearing that question or at least not having to answer it.

To the OP:

Visually I like larger breasts. Does it affect my arousal if she has smaller breasts? No. It does negatively affect my arousal if my partner's breasts are insensate blobs of silicon or saline.

Do I use breast size as a litmus test of which woman to get involved with? No. I'm much more attracted to a woman's mind and kinks than I am to her appearance in the long term.



LadyEllen -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 10:14:30 AM)

Just to say how glad I am that smaller breasts, long slender legs and rounded butts are so much in fashion.

Now if I could just do something about my face, I'd have it made

E



slaveMastery -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 10:15:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

My ex-wife nursed our unmentionables with her breasts.  So technically, these were fully functional mammary glands / breasts.  I did not particularly become aroused by the taste of breast milk, and her cup size went from C to double H during that time period.  I dont recall being more or less sexually aroused by her ballerina breasts moreso than the nose cones of a 747.



Holy crap! Did you have to have hangar doors installed on your house?

But right on the money - what does the world's most spectacular pair of tits do me good if the girl's attitude and personality have the suction capacity of a shop vac!?



meatcleaver -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 10:39:29 AM)

As someone who would prefer the bubonic plague before a serious relationship, at least at the moment, let me make a defence of shallow. For the long haul you need a personality attached to the physical female assets but in the short term you don't. Who cares if she is moronic or whether she is a malicious vindictive harraden, you aren't going to marry her so see her as a way of lightening up a few cold winter evenings. She's in physical good shape, she's not cheap for a night out but a damn sight cheaper than a permanent partner with a direct link to your bank account. Since the relationship isn't going anywhere, she is a piece of art to manipulate so you want as near to a master piece as you can attract so I'm looking for physical not spiritual. Now if I'm worried about her personality I'm going to have to investigate her a lot more than just a couple of evenings but I'm not, I'm shallow, as long as we hit it off, I'm looking for physical so breasts as well as ass come into it, its the instant turn on, she's a shooting star, not the light of my life. In the morning I'll call her a taxi which she is fine about because I'm paying and then I get on with my day and no worries about a woman complaining I'm not around for her or not paying her enough attention or she doesn't like my attitude or the hallway needs painting or a shelf needs hanging and its your turn to cook or take the kid to school.



marieToo -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 12:00:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RiotGirl

i'm fascinated to hear what is said as well.  I just hope everyone understands what you're asking.  You arent asking what "type" is best.. or what their preference is


edited to add - i dont think the question will ever get answered.  Men are going to get too caught up on expounding the virtues and non virtues of the breastes



LOL RG....I figured this would happen to an extent too.  I appreciate all of their responses anyway. Some of them *were* quite capable of separating the wheat from the chaff...but most did not get it, or got it in a *kinda sorta* way. lol

Let us as women, bear in mind that these men who took the time to offer us enlightenment, were actually thinking about breasts while trying to understand my question..  The word "Breast" was, in fact the very first word of my post.  Can we then blame them for not having captured my exact drift? 

Seriously, I appreciate the responses....

Im gonna read em now....



marieToo -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 12:08:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveMastery

For me, there is a clear difference between initial attraction and lasting arousal.

Quite obviously, bigger is better in the initial sense of being able to catch the eye and draw attention. But then the subsequent step is does that initial attraction manage to prevail in the naked one-on-one (or heck, many-on-one for that matter) interaction and exchange?

I have come to find the most wonderful racks (38 DDD) quite useless in play because they were either overly sensitive or so profouondly and excessively desensitized that playing with a doormat might have offered more potential for diversion. And then I have found some of the most understated mamilaries (32 A) to an endless source of fun and pleasure, because they offered just the right levels and potential for creative and incessant use.

Hence - for me, big will initially catch the eye, but the arousal will actually arise from the use of the breast, not its size and shape.


Mr.slaveMastery, you get an A+.    Yes, you talk about your preferences etc etc..... but in the end, it is clear that you understood my question and answered it quite succinctly in your very last sentence.  Your sentence tells me that your level of arousal has everything to do with 'useability' and nothing to do with size or shape. 

Thank you.




marieToo -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 12:10:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

A breast, even a small one is a big chunk of body.........it is a moving part that we don't possess in any great degree (usually)  it is going to end up like talking about the grand hunks of solid iron that ensconce the pelvic area of men, if you got tits the size of your head, thats all well and fine, but comes with a set of issues all its own.   

If you got fried egg titties they have a certain charm as well.

Ron


*Sigh*.   Whats a girl going to do with you???[sm=ugh.gif]



marieToo -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 12:13:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

I dont recall being more or less sexually aroused by her ballerina breasts moreso than the nose cones of a 747.



Thank you too, Mr. Sinergy.  You grasped it too!  In other words, (I think) the size or shape didnt really matter in regards to your level of arousal.



Sinergy -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 12:15:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

I dont recall being more or less sexually aroused by her ballerina breasts moreso than the nose cones of a 747.



Thank you too, Mr. Sinergy.  You grasped it too!  In other words, (I think) the size or shape didnt really matter in regards to your level of arousal.


That is correct, it did not.

Sinergy



marieToo -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 12:15:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

I'm a leg and ass man so breasts aren't that important to me.
I do like smaller breasts on a woman though.
Big breasts just seem to get in the way.
To me "bigger is *not* better."
As for "attraction" breasts don't play that much of a role.
Slender with a nice ass and legs are what attracts me!
Small breasted women shouldn't be worried about being "small."
There are a lot of us guys out here who are attracted to them!
And don't get implants!
"Natural" is the best!


ai yai yai!



marieToo -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 12:23:06 PM)



quote:

Breasts.....How important are they to you in regards to physical attraction?


quote:

None.


Ok this counts as a direct answer. Thank you Mr. Merc.  

quote:

And how shallow does that sound considering beth's "perfect" natural breasts?


As a real quick 'aside' here.  Im glad you made this statement here, because if you hadn't, we never would've noticed beth's perfect breasts....I mean...honest.   :)



marieToo -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 12:25:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen



To the OP:

Visually I like larger breasts. Does it affect my arousal if she has smaller breasts? No. It does negatively affect my arousal if my partner's breasts are insensate blobs of silicon or saline.



Ah Mr. Ken, you got the question too! Thank you.




marieToo -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 12:34:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Emperor1956

You want the truth?  YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!


Ha!  I knew someone would say that.


quote:

No matter.  Breasts do not matter much to me.  Really.  I've been aroused by women with A-cups and with DDs.  I tend to like women, by the way, so this reply doesn't take into account the attraction of man-boobs (being fully honest here, Marie, as you asked.)


Thanks for the answer.  But um.......I didnt say nuttin bout no man boobs!!! 

And I also wonder if I should have posed this question to females who are bisexual or lesbian.  Damn, that was really hetero of me.  Sorry ladies!



marieToo -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 12:36:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: somethndif

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

Breasts.....How important are they to you in regards to physical attraction?

To those men who would be so inclined to honor my request.....I am not interested in hearing in particular what "type" or "shape" of breasts you prefer....I am simply interested in the importance of it to your arousal when naked with your woman.

In other words,  If you have a preference for a particular type of breast, but your sub/slave/lover/whatever does not have the size and shape you ideally prefer, how much or little does it affect your arousal ----and/or does it turn you off to any extent?  If so...is it Alittle?  Some?  Not at all?  Alot?? 


Contrary to what appears to be American men's fixation with breasts, they have very little effect on my arousal.  I prefer average to smaller breasts, actually.  Larger breasts sag with age and, to me, become unattractive.  I do like sensitive nipples, though.  But I have been with women with very large breasts, and women with very, very small breasts.

What I really like are cunts and asses, but especially cunts.  I like to play with them, torture them and make them cum over and over, and make them squirt.  *grin*

Dan


Would you all excuse me for just a bit.  bbl.....



subfever -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 12:43:54 PM)

Another leg & ass man here, attracted to slender women.

All other things being equal, natural is better than fake, and sexually responsive breasts are always a treat.

But in terms of initial attraction, breasts are not high on my list. I'm a happy camper, as long as they're bigger than mine... [;)]



SlaveAkasha -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 12:52:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Emperor1956

You want the truth?  YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!


Ha!  I knew someone would say that.


quote:

No matter.  Breasts do not matter much to me.  Really.  I've been aroused by women with A-cups and with DDs.  I tend to like women, by the way, so this reply doesn't take into account the attraction of man-boobs (being fully honest here, Marie, as you asked.)


Thanks for the answer.  But um.......I didnt say nuttin bout no man boobs!!! 

And I also wonder if I should have posed this question to females who are bisexual or lesbian.  Damn, that was really hetero of me.  Sorry ladies!


To answer this part for you. 
 
No, it doesn't.  I have had women with big ones and not so big ones, it really didn't matter.  My ex was really concerned because she had one that was a cup bigger than the other, but to be honest I really never noticed.  It's funny how those breasts seemed exactly the same with a nipple in my mouth.
 
I do like natural, not into the fake thingys at all.  That is really the only thing about a boob that can turn me off.  The size..small, medium, or huge... all fit perfect in my hands or mouth.
 
Kasha



lordboundheart -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (11/29/2006 1:01:01 PM)

Breasts are only important to me in the area of having them. Not having any is a turn off. but breasts in general are not key to my arousal, I get hard from the acts and from the reactions of my partner.



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125