RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH!

RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

mgdartist -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/3/2006 9:26:10 PM)
hmmph. art...tits...avant-garde, Artists casting their pearls before such cochonery...this is becoming painfully oxy-moronic. I must abdicate this low-born thread, with no offense to the OP I pray, who did give her blessing to our meandering off topic here, which apparently some failed to notice....hmmm? carry on, carry on. I'll sully your babbling of breasts not one moment more. a gaggle of nipple clamps, the lot of you... lol goes to send the good Lady Ellen a pm(hoping she checks her bulk mail)

mnottertail -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/3/2006 9:34:13 PM)
probably more about charcuterie than cochonery but nevertheless, when you got a good one, hard to let em go.

Noah -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/3/2006 9:46:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lorelei115 And yes, I know there are definitely petite gals out there that are well-gifted by nature, but they seem to be rather few and far between. Thats how I see it anyway. Am I wrong? Well I guess two is few, but not too few. But can you explain how two big gazongas on one petite gal are gonna be far between? Are they growing in her armpits or something?

petdave -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/3/2006 10:02:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sinergy Size 2 waifs have become attractive in the modern world partially because of the widespread beliefs in the health hazards of obesity, as well as the health benefits of exercise. These biases exist within the context of their times... Sinergy i haven't heard that argument before. While perhaps healthier than being a lardass like me, "heroin chic" models that makes you want to play their ribs like a xylophone aren't especially healthy either. i prefer the theory that conceptions of beauty follow that which is unusual, or that which is associated with the rich and idle. When the commoners had to scrap for food, and worked in the fields all day, the beauties were soft, pale, and plump. When food was readily available, and the average person worked inside all day, the ideal of beauty became tan and lean, because they had the spare time to tan and work out. Since the average woman is significantly shorter than the average male, most models are freakishly tall. It's all about the perverse drive to get what you can't have. ...dave

Lordandmaster -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/3/2006 10:40:12 PM)
Not to mention cornichonery. quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail probably more about charcuterie than cochonery but nevertheless, when you got a good one, hard to let em go.

meatcleaver -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/3/2006 11:05:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sinergy These sorts of women were considered beautiful during that time period because they had enough to eat, were considered high class, no obvious scars, no dishpan hands, etc. Size 2 waifs have become attractive in the modern world partially because of the widespread beliefs in the health hazards of obesity, as well as the health benefits of exercise. These biases exist within the context of their times... Sinergy Very much so. There are several forgers who weren't recognized at the time they were working, thinking they were faking the period they were trying to paint and a few decades after their death being recognized because the forgers couldn't escape the fashionable prejudices of the their time. I think that shows how imbred fashion can be so someone not trying to escape their contemporary time period, I would imagine, would accentuated the prejudices of their time even more.

mnottertail -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/3/2006 11:13:04 PM)
LOFUCKINLOL................

Lorelei115 -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/4/2006 7:36:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Noah quote: ORIGINAL: Lorelei115 And yes, I know there are definitely petite gals out there that are well-gifted by nature, but they seem to be rather few and far between. Thats how I see it anyway. Am I wrong? Well I guess two is few, but not too few. But can you explain how two big gazongas on one petite gal are gonna be far between? Are they growing in her armpits or something? The women themselves are a rare breed.. The breasts themselves are generally in the proper position. [8\|] Unless she's laying on her back, then they tend to have a bit of distance between them I suppose.

Sinergy -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/4/2006 12:32:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: petdave When the commoners had to scrap for food, and worked in the fields all day, the beauties were soft, pale, and plump. Have you ever worked in the fields all day? A rubenesque woman did not have to work in the field and could sit around all day long eating cake, never get any color in her skin from the sun, doing nothing but putting on weight. Hence she was considered beautiful by the people of her time. Just me, could be wrong, but there you go. Sinergy Edited for clarity

LadyEllen -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/4/2006 12:40:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mgdartist goes to send the good Lady Ellen a pm(hoping she checks her bulk mail) Youre such a tease! Nothing here so far.....? I even checked the bulk mail, and nothing. E

chrisea623 -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/5/2006 6:38:31 PM)
i dont focus on breasts, they are very very nice, but the sexiest part of a girl is what is between.. her ears..bet i got some people

mgdartist -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/5/2006 8:01:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyEllen quote: ORIGINAL: mgdartist goes to send the good Lady Ellen a pm(hoping she checks her bulk mail) Youre such a tease! Nothing here so far.....? I even checked the bulk mail, and nothing. E as if... sent you a long one... checked sent mail...said you'd read it.... im cornfused some more.

Sinergy -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/5/2006 9:53:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mgdartist cochonery... Dictionary.com and myself have no idea what this word is. Are you trying to say "chicanery?"

Lordandmaster -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/5/2006 9:54:46 PM)
He's trying to say "cochonnerie."

Lorelei115 -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/5/2006 9:57:38 PM)
Are we talking about pickles in here?

Sinergy -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/5/2006 10:05:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster He's trying to say "cochonnerie." Another dud on dictionary.com. I was thinking chicanery, but that is just me and I could be wrong. Sinergy

Lordandmaster -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/5/2006 10:19:58 PM)
No, he means "cochonnerie," even if he doesn't know how to spell it; it's French and should be in any online French dictionary, and should be in OED too. (Edited to add: It's not in OED. Anyway, it's derived from the word "cochon," meaning "pig," and refers to any grotesque, obscene, pig-like thing or action. It's like the Spanish word "porqueria," or the German word "Schweinerei.") I was thinking along the same lines as whoever just asked about pickles when I said "cornichonery."

emdoub -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/5/2006 10:25:47 PM)
To drag this back to the OP, uphill in thin mud against the wind.... quote: ORIGINAL: marieToo In other words, If you have a preference for a particular type of breast, but your sub/slave/lover/whatever does not have the size and shape you ideally prefer, how much or little does it affect your arousal ----and/or does it turn you off to any extent? If so...is it Alittle? Some? Not at all? Alot?? I can be honest without fearing to appear shallow - in some things, I'm damned proud to be shallow. My breast size preference is for about an A or B cup - especially in my age bracket, that's the best shot for some firmness. However, breast size/shape is secondary to nipple configuration - if she's got pencil-eraser nipples, all is good, if she doesn't, that's a turn-on I'll have to do without. I'm very much a butt guy - if she has a great butt, I don't really care one way or another about her breasts - great nipples are the cherry on the sundae at that point. Call it 80% ass and legs, 15% face, and 5% breasts. Could the right personality overcome any of these physical preferences? Certainly. The wrong personality has certainly made the perfect butt unattractive - the right one will overcome a less-than-perfect butt. However, that's not gonna compete well with another 'right' personality who rides around in a fine ass with great legs. OTOH, as I'm coming up on 50, it's a tad shameful to be so fond of physical attributes - after all, my own body seems to have turned traitor. My waistline bugs me a lot - it's passing the 34" mark, and I really don't like that much. Time for situps? I cringe at the thought, but - it looks to be that time. Midnight Writer Arrogant and narcissistic, it seems....

mgdartist -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/5/2006 11:37:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sinergy quote: ORIGINAL: mgdartist cochonery... Dictionary.com and myself have no idea what this word is. Are you trying to say "chicanery?" lol, just my odd habit of adlib. derived from the french word for pig: "cochon" ...add "ery" as english suffix indicating "in the state of being like or acting as". sigh, will i need to draw you guys a picture? ...I mean, with words like "qat" and "raj" and even "aa" popping up in Websters, i had to stop taking them seriously and making my own, multi-lingual derivatives. "avant-garde" involves being ahead of one's time as often as not, and how do you think these dictionary dorks come up with new words anyway? I needed a tongue-in-cheek word to give a backhanded inference, and made one that had, I can now see, the desired effect. I'm sure Webster's and OED will catch up in a year or 2, and then you will see it listed under "C" and realize, maybe even after I'm dead, that I really was a visionary. damn skeptics. lol

LadyEllen -> RE: OK MEN, I WANT THE TRUTH! (12/6/2006 3:06:24 AM)
Le mot est cochonnerie et en Anglais elle voudrait dire "filth/rubbish/trash". Peut etre on pourrait verifier avec Chloelicious? Elle s'habite en Belge, et la Francais est sa langue maternelle. Mais, ma preference est pour les mots Anglais - nous utilisons deja beaucoup des mots Francais, et si nous regardons nos amis Allemands et leur langue, ils ont deja un mot que nous pourrions adapter - Schweinerei, ou en Anglais adapte "swinery", qui se fonctionnerait bien a decrire les idees de "filthy" parce qu'on l'utilisait le mot pour un lieu ou on cultive les cochons, et aussi "dirty trick". E

Page: << < prev 7 8 [9] 10 11 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125