RE: Bondage Pictures Banned

RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

LadySeraphina -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/4/2006 3:13:42 PM)
How do pictures of ponyboys come into it? I had a picture of myself sitting on my hosueboy and he was just wearing a headpiece. He wasn't in bondage, all four legs - werm, 'arms and legs' - were free to move. Still, not a big deal, I just uploaded something different.

Powerman40 -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/4/2006 3:21:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: darksdesire i submitted a photo of just my torso, clad in a sheerish camisole, panties and a garter. No face. It was rejected with no explanation. There was no nudity, (unless you count the hint of nipple under the sheer material), it wasn't in any way obscene, didn't depict any sort of bondage. i didn't try submitting another picture because i simply don't understand the criteria. Of course they have the right to reject whatever photos they want, but it would be nice to understand why those that seem to fit the criteria are rejected. But then...it is sooooooo much better than all those pictures of penises and vaginas you find on the other sites. You can toss that pic my way and I will be happy to give you an opinion on it VBS

peterK50 -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/4/2006 3:29:51 PM)
Who would expect bondage pics on a bondage site? Then look at my pic, it's A-OK. Go figure

Mikal -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/4/2006 4:33:14 PM)
What? Aren't you just looking for a dropped contact at a nudist resort?????

Milf -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/4/2006 4:36:52 PM)
I noticed really old women having their saggy wrinkly tits being allowed - but if I post a picture of me with a bra on...Non-Bondage - No Nudity...it's denied. Why? I guess it's because saggy tits is better then nice 42DD's.

MisPandora -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/4/2006 5:40:55 PM)
And a guess as to how CM can fly the nudie banner ads is that the stuff is not HOSTED on their servers, therefore, by the letter of 2257, it's not their responsibility. You'll notice though, that none of it is bondage. It's just waist-up females (clothed or not) who are supposedly in the area that you, the user, is registered in.

kc692 -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/4/2006 7:13:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MstrssPassion That is something that has been discussed before & never once has it been answered. Why is it a man submits a bare chested pic, with or without face & it is rejected but the women submit bare chested pics with or without face & they are accepted? I have seen some really good chest pics of men on the other side, with and without face.

whisperedsighs -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/4/2006 8:40:03 PM)
Thank you MstrssPassion, I was wondering how long it would take someone to put up the Section 18 U.S.C. § 2257

whisperedsighs -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/4/2006 8:45:12 PM)
It's the hint of nipple. I don't know what it is with this government, but you can have girls wandering around a convention in a thong, and with electric tape on their nipples. But the electric tape has to be on the nipple covering it.

darksdesire -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/4/2006 8:49:43 PM)
ahhhhhhh. The forbidden nipple! Of course!

LadySeraphina -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/4/2006 8:53:38 PM)
I always have trouble when it comes to American regulations. Not that I'm all that familiar with Canadian ones, but since I'm up North, I hadn't even heard of "2257" until reading some of these posts. It's enlightening.

Ashkitty -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/5/2006 12:07:38 AM)
I had to submit my current main pic three times, and complain about it to support. It's not bondage. It's not ANYTHING that could possibly be percieved as dirty (...eeeexcept groping, but that's pg-13 for christ's sake), and they eventually let it slide. I'm normally very, very lax about complaining on any subject.. but I'd submitted no less than three other pictures, all tame, vanilla and fully clothed, and they were rejected.. so I kinda lost my temper. My Mistress even submitted one of herself, a completely beautiful pic of her, again, fully dressed and totally unkinky, and it got rejected. I don't know, but sometimes I think the pic reviewers just hit deny so they don't actually have to look at anything. Can I apply to be a picmod?

givemyall -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/5/2006 12:30:13 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Milf I noticed really old women having their saggy wrinkly tits being allowed - but if I post a picture of me with a bra on...Non-Bondage - No Nudity...it's denied. Why? I guess it's because saggy tits is better then nice 42DD's. I've only ever had one piccy turned down, but it did involve leg cuffs, so I kind of expected it. Never had a problem with the other pics, perhaps its because im one of those really old woman with saggy wrinkly tits [:D] Thanks for reminding me of my many years on this earth Milf......there is life after 22 by the way [;)]

Aine -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/5/2006 6:14:21 AM)
Ok, I don't think there's just one person that approves and dis-approves the pics. I think it might have to do with whoever might be working on it at the time and their personal opinions in regards to the criteria and the law. Oh, and I've seen plenty of female bare chest shots. I think they're cracking down on some of them, reasons beyond me. But there was a change in the allowables in the past 6 months to a year if my memory serves me. Prior to this time, things like the dungeons and whatnot were not even allowed. I think that in lieu of the laws involved, especially when this is a -FREE SITE- that people need to do less complaining and just be happy that we have this place. Personally, and yes I MEAN personally, I prefer the more tasteful/less sexual pics on here, I don't particulary on a daily basis want to be confronted by cock and cooch pics when I get bored and browse the profiles. If I wanted to do that, I would go to yahoo or look at some of my porn. But hey, that's me.

mnottertail -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/5/2006 6:15:59 AM)
when are your nekkid shots gonna show up? I been browsing your profile 40 or 50 times a day trying to find them.......... HNG

kitriana -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/5/2006 6:26:56 AM)
i got clothed, normal, nice vanilla pics turned down last time i submitted some. not even for looking young as has happened before, but because the person approving them said i was "a fat, ugly bitch" after i politely turned down his online advances for cyber-domination (which I don't do). No lie. I believe the official excuse was "inappropriate content" in a picture with someone comepletely clothed, by themself. i think it is all about who is looking at your pictures and their prefrences as to whether or not you can get your bra (or anything) up.

Amaros -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/5/2006 6:27:11 AM)
In my experience, these things tend to escalate: "tasteful" to one, is "chickenshit" to somebody else, and they post something less tasteful - pretty soon people are trying to outdo each other with how far they can go. The mods probobly have lives and aren't interested in micromanaging about a million profiles - easier to just say no.

Aine -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/5/2006 6:41:00 AM)
I don't know -who- you're sending your pics to, but I highly doubt that any of the mods of this site are that trollish or retarded.

Aileen68 -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/5/2006 6:43:08 AM)
The mods aren't the ones approving or disapproving the pics. That task is done by volunteers.

Aine -> RE: Bondage Pictures Banned (12/5/2006 6:46:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail when are your nekkid shots gonna show up? I been browsing your profile 40 or 50 times a day trying to find them.......... HNG Well, I had one shot that was kinda cleavaged, but trust me, the amount of emails I got, and the level of utter stupidity enclosed therein, was astounding. I have little patience for those things so I'll have to appologize Ron, I don't think I'll be posting them any time soon. [;)]

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125