MidnightWriter
Posts: 131
Joined: 2/8/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NATI quote:
As for hypnosis, I wouldn't use it personally during a session or at all. And as for the 'fact' that a person under hypnosis wouldn't do something 'morally' wrong on a personal level, I have seen to be an untrue statement. I have seen friends do just that. During a hypnotic state they have consented to things that would not be acceptable to them in everyday life. I am curious to know what modality was used to induce the hypnosis (if you know) and what it was your friends consented to that fell outside of the framework of 'moral acceptability'. I have seen this done, but it takes a devious route. As an example, Sally would never consent to undress in public. Sally is hypnotized, and convinced that she's alone, at home, getting ready for bed - and Sally sleeps in the nude. It takes a very deep trance, but it can be done. One should only enter into hypnosis with someone you can trust to be honorable, and whom you can trust to know what they're doing. I use some hypnotic techniques, but I won't use hypnotic trance, largely because I'm not qualified to do so safely. In reply to the OP, yes - subspace and hypnosis are both altered states, with many similarities - the most obvious being that neither is your usual waking state. There are, however, distinct differences between them.
_____________________________
Power corrupts. Absolute power ... is really pretty nifty.
|