ownedgirlie
Posts: 9184
Joined: 2/5/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross quote:
ORIGINAL: mistoferin Agree. Once again though....many will read this post and will still try to define abuse by a single contributing factor. We look at things such as consent, intent, harm.....as seperate entitities and then try to say they make a "whole, encompassing" definition. It simply will not work. Agreed as well. We also have two issues to consider AFTER the "abuse" occurs- one is helping the abused heal and move on, the other is deciding what, if any, actions the abuser should be held accountable for and punished for. I know lots of people like to put the two together, but I'm really not certain that one goes with the other. I bolded one of your sentences for emphasis. I believe these are two seperate beasts. Healing from abuse can be a horrible, painful, and very long process. I am going through it myself. But he will probably never be held accountable for his actions. Who would he be accountable to? I'm not filing charges; I am getting on with my life. He is a sick, narcissistic and dilusional man. Three therapists told him he was abusive. He argued it. He will look me straight in the eye when I tell him I feel abused by him, and say "Well you're wrong, and I have the facts to know that." So I must take responsibility for my own healing, and I am doing so, with the help of my Master, friends who are better to me than I deserve, and therapy. :) What happens to him should be of no consequence to me - that's the trap I am working to get out of. My focus should be on being in the present, and on my road ahead. Not on the evils of the past. My road ahead means letting go of those past evils, but that does not mean living in the past (great Jethro Tull song, btw) or dwelling on it. The abused must work on healing whether or not the abuser faces the music. Once the abused can emotionally separate him/herself from the abuser, he/she can begin that path.
|