RE: Carter, his book, Palestine, the American problem - 1/2/2007 9:23:53 AM
|
|
|
luckydog1
Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006 Status: offline
|
the original point was to do with learning from the past, as with alcoholics the first step required honetsly admitting the issue.... But Europeons are pretending that they have done this - nope just moving further along it. Spain was bombing Morrocoo in the past 5 years to keep its colonies in Africa - please provide News Story for this, or are you referring to the uninhabited rock off the North African coast? Actually Spain has 2 city states colonies on the Morrocan Mainland also. But yes I am refering to the Island 500 Yrds off of a major Morrocann city where Spain recently put in gun emplacements. When Rebels in Courte De Ivory killed some french troops, they bomed a town from the air killing thousands, again in the 21st century. - and the number of dead in Somalia during the Black HAwk down incident was? oh it was very high, but we were there as a UN force and other nations helped get that number up- we can start throwing stones back and forward if you like, I'm willing to concede the US inflicted body count post WWII will be higher, I suppose if you pretend that Algeria didnt happen, and take no credit for the messes you left behind in africa asia and the mideast that might be true. The Falklands war - I think Britain was attacked? Funiest thing was that most brits couldn't understand why Argentia wanted a set of islands off of Scotland until they had a look at the atlas. Outcome of the war...democracy in Argentina....... The Balkans War - yep Middle Ages thinking is still around, got me there. .......but by Europe do we meen, continent of, or concepts, or European Union....does America meen, USA, or North America, or include US and Columbia. "America" means the USA, "North America" means Canada, Mexico, USA, and the Carribiean, and "The Americas" refers to all the lands of the Western Hemisphere, ......nope I'll claim the Bulkans is not part of the Europe I am referring to...i.e. democratic Europe, West of the old Soviet Pact. Right, the part with American armies in them ( or with security arangements with them), occupyied after ww2( that was my point before- the 'europeon enlightenment' you have now is not based on social events of the people of europe, but on who occupyied you after ww2, the east suffered more in the war than you did in the west). Afterall one of the EU tenents of civilisation is the abolition of the death penalty and the new Eastern EU members notably Poland want to change that one. France and Germany were taking Bribes From Saddam - wonder if they came from money orignally paid to him by another power to fight the Iranians( glad you admit to it)............now getting Germany and France to launch a war without UN / international law supporting them that I woudl like to see (post WWII of course)"Kosovo".........and of course with German laws being implied to allow prosecution of members of the Bush admnistration for crimes against humanity....that will be interesting. No, I bet nothing of the sort will ever happen. I know the EU desperatly wants some puppet dictators of thier own( you already admitted to taking bribes and cutting deals with Saddam, also look at french dealings with Sudan) - nope we call then Buerocrats (how do you spell that word) and they work in Brussells already, but they do believe the pen or at least check book is mightier than the cruise missile.... the Eu seems very intent on keeping the borders they drew for the world intact, when they were set up to harm the areas involved - are yes the imperialist argument, I seem to remember that Israel / Palasine / West Bank / Gazza, which could have something to do with excuses for Middle East strife, are post departure of European power..........on the wider front I think the EU tends to be more based on pragmatism e.g. recognition of Slovenia, Bosnia-Hertzgo, Eritria, and other "new nations" That you have learned these great lessons is your myth, - perhaps learning and relearning that conflict is not the objective of politics, and actually rarely accomplishes the stated aims anymore, at least since the advent of industrialised total war anyway. the reality is that you are occupyied by the USA - are the crux of your argument, by which you imply the iron baseball boot( nope just that we Have our armies there) held firmly at the throat of those naughty ungrateful Europeans, and which as an occupier would enable them to ensure the Europeans vote for US policy in the UN, (NOPE)( just 98% of the time), provide finance and troops for foregin wars (generally NOPE ( actually generally Yes)- but Afghanistan yes....ish), and of course as an occupier it would not be possible for American Merger plans to be prevented by the Europeans - oops GE and Honewell merger stopped by Europe( no it doesn't), launch of Euro ( we set the conditions and encouraged the development of the EC, then The Eu and the Euro, we want that to happen) causes slide in dollar and allows US companies to be bought at knockdown prices, those occupied EU countries can spend less on health care but get wider coverage, provide higher levels of aid to greater numbers of countries( not true, thats a game that can be played though) and therefore improve on their automatic 22 votes to 1( that you have 2 votes in the Security council while Africa and South America get zero is more important than that, but we have a final veto over everytihng, so it doesn't really matter to us) starting point for international agreements and trade negotiations with other countries..... bugger being occupied is such a drag( its the best thing that ever happened to you, I agree, and you take full advantage of it, that is to be expected).... And yes Americans have our own silly myths, every culture does. - yes every country does and many believe them, perhaps some more than others, what is interesting is the reverence with which some people hold on to them, whilst others realise they are just another form of belief without substance. At which I come back to a lovely term I have been introduced to Jacksonian thinking.......so in your terms the US continues to occupy Europe which under the Jacksonian tennet will only be for selfish me, me, me, reasons, which I presume therefore is purely for the benefit of the US, and when Europeans object concerning the actions of the US, the US doesnt like the absence of support from Europe.................Jacksonian is not the only strain of thought in America, to pretend it is is just simplistic. I under stand you spent time in the midwest, and didnt like it, but that would be like judging Europe from ones time spent in Albania)............ I think I must have missed something somewhere......Yes you certainly did. Mostly you confirming that the warsaw pact/Nato lines are the crux of Post ww2 social, economic political development, not your myth of the "people had enough of War". So if we eliminate all your argument based on "occupation must be bad and expoloitive", and sarcasm, you didnt really say much. ..............
< Message edited by luckydog1 -- 1/2/2007 9:31:41 AM >
|
|
|