TPEOwner -> RE: It Aint A Gift (12/29/2006 9:36:45 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mstr2you How many times do I have to read these words " submission is a gift". Fuck you and your gift. If submission is a gift it is a gift to yourself and while selfless gifts to ones self are always appreciated and one always knows just what one needs, saying that ones submission is a gift to the dominant is an expression of the submissives ego, not at all an altruistic expression of giving which is what they would like it to mean. Your submission, assuming this is real to you and not a frivoulous experiment in your sexual growth which is fine by me , is not a choice at all because it is what is inside you, it is part of you, it is a need you have. That being the case it is not a gift, it is a reaching out to your partner for a mutual satisfaction of your needs which in my opinion is exactly what this is about. In the most extreme form the sadist gets his or hers and the masochist does the same, no gifts are exchanged, just mutual needs met and I think that carries out through most bdsm relationships from the most sado maso to the most casual scening. Here is why this bother me. If what being offered was a true gift, as in ..here take this gift from me to you and do with it what you will , than there are no boundries, no limits, no choices because a gift that comes with conditions is surely not a gift at all and a gift that comes without any conditions can be used, ignored, or tossed in the trash at the receivers whim. I suppose that in the insane situation where a submissive were to give his or her self with absolutely no conditions or limits at all to a dominant than one could argue it's a gift but I would still say that they are doing it out of their own need and it is still a gift to themselves . Just my thoughts and yours are most welcome. This whole submission is a gift thing is just another manifestation of the internet. Our lifestyle has become a haven for emotionally broken people who are either looking for someone to fix them, or have realized that putting dominant or submissive in front of their name instead of co-dependendent, bi-polar, depressed or obsessive, they can attract other people and make excuses for their otherwise unacceptable behavior paterns. The one thing that all those submission is a gift advocates have in common is that none of them under any circumstances ever intends to submit to or dominate anyone. When a "submissive" comes with a 3 volume set of limits, what they are essentilly saying is that they will allow you to "make" them do anything they want to do anyway, and if you even dare to suggest making them do something they don't want to do, they will be flinging the abuse thing around to anyone and everyone who will listen. And on the "dominant" side, they are willing to put up with that sort of thing because it's the best they can get. The typical het dominant male sub female couple I see thes days, consists of a submissive male top and a dominant female bottom. They pretend to the world and even themselves that he is in control, but she runs the relationship completely, and he hops to to "dominante" her exactly as she requires. And if they make each other happy, more power to them. The world needs more happy people. So back to "submission is a gift". What the words really mean is "I'm doing you a favor by giving you the time of day buster, and you had best not forget it or I will find another 'master'." So I agree with you. Take your gift and find a dom who needs someone to do him a favor by submitting to him. I'm not the droid you are looking for. It's an absolute deal breaker for me. As soon as I see or hear those words, I'm not interested. End of story.
|
|
|
|