Dominate Man

Dominate Man (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress

Message

kywildcat -> Dominate Man (12/21/2006 6:49:12 PM)
Who better to serve a Mistress than a Knight ?

Grlwithboy -> RE: Dominate Man (12/21/2006 6:51:04 PM)
Hm. Well, I have a bottom who's a switch, but mostly you could describe it as "in charge with most people, not in charge with me" I think a Dominant man would make a really crappy submissive for me, way too much conflict. Or do you just mean "man who's submissive but not a push over to anyone who walks along?"

defiantbadgirl -> RE: Dominate Man (12/21/2006 6:52:18 PM)
Are you seeking a switch then?

pixelslave -> RE: Dominate Man (12/21/2006 8:43:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kywildcat Who better to serve a Mistress than a Knight ? Makes perfect sense to me. Historically Knights were very service oriented, particularly toward a lady who showed him her favor and he would wear her "colors" in the form of a hankerchief, scarf, or anything she gave him to honor her. [8\|] - pixel

DiamondOrchid -> RE: Dominate Man (12/21/2006 9:45:38 PM)
My sub (Knight or otherwise), MUST be able to spell and understand the proper usage of english words. 'Dominate Man' - individually, the word make sense. Together, they don't. Unless you meant 'Woman wanted to Dominate (a) Man'? D.

Voltare -> RE: Dominate Man (12/21/2006 9:57:25 PM)
As I read this, it sounds like the sub is commanding a woman to dominate him....hrmmmmm Dominant = Adjective Dominate = Verb

DiurnalVampire -> RE: Dominate Man (12/21/2006 10:12:21 PM)
Im sort of confused. Maybe I am the only one... The OP asked who better to serve a Mistress than a Knight? My boy isnt a Knight and he does rather well for himself. Are you offering yourself to serve? And mostly... where the heck do you mention anything about being a Knight? NyQuil indused confusion DV

Lorelei115 -> RE: Dominate Man (12/21/2006 10:38:06 PM)
This sounds familiar... a quote from someone else's profile.. hmmm Let me get back to you on that one...

BlkTallFullfig -> RE: Dominate Man (12/21/2006 11:17:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kywildcat Who better to serve a Mistress than a Knight ? I like the idea a lot actually, of a strong gentleman who submits to his lady. [:)] Welcome to the boards kywildcat. M

Voltare -> RE: Dominate Man (12/22/2006 5:14:55 AM)
As a concept, I would think quite a few dominant women would want just that. As a post clearly trolling for a date, it doesn't seem so impressive.

thetammyjo -> RE: Dominate Man (12/22/2006 5:23:49 AM)
Actually I think the knight model of service can be very useful and successful in a Ds relationship if you both agree that is what you are looking for. I always thought that Marcus was an excellent knight on Babylon Five and I think he also had great potential as a submissive/slave if only Ivannova had her heart and eyes open earlier.

crouchingtigress -> RE: Dominate Man (12/22/2006 5:24:55 AM)
I am fond of the court jesters myself.....[:)]

LaTigresse -> RE: Dominate Man (12/22/2006 7:58:47 AM)
I kinda prefer the Ladies in Waiting myself[;)]

TeeGO -> RE: Dominate Man (12/22/2006 9:02:50 AM)
Strength and submission are not mutually exclusive... The Knight kneeling to his Queen. His sworn obedience to her Majesty. His life for hers, without a moments hesitation. No sacrifice too great, no task performed for her too small. The ecstasy of service to Her glorious, radiant DOMANANCE! Could be a good begining of an updated profile. :)

MrrPete -> RE: Dominate Man (12/22/2006 9:11:19 AM)
Be careful ladies he doesn't know the difference between Dominant and Dominate.

LaTigresse -> RE: Dominate Man (12/22/2006 9:31:34 AM)
Thats okay, it gave TeeGo some excellent ideas!

ShiftedJewel -> RE: Dominate Man (12/22/2006 10:33:25 AM)
*Ah TeeGo... how I have missed your posts!!!* *And to me... well, it sounds perfect.* *Jewel*

pixelslave -> RE: Dominate Man (12/22/2006 11:23:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: crouchingtigress I am fond of the court jesters myself.....[:)] Does that mean you have a thing for guys who wear hats with an extra ball or two attached? [;)] - pixel

pixelslave -> RE: Dominate Man (12/22/2006 11:32:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LaTigresse I kinda prefer the Ladies in Waiting myself[;)] Does that mean we should call you Mistress Joan (of Arc) and eventually burn you at the stake?? [sm=trident.gif] - pixel

pixelslave -> RE: Dominate Man (12/22/2006 11:44:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thetammyjo Actually I think the knight model of service can be very useful and successful in a Ds relationship if you both agree that is what you are looking for. I always thought that Marcus was an excellent knight on Babylon Five and I think he also had great potential as a submissive/slave if only Ivannova had her heart and eyes open earlier. How about Luke Skywalker of Star Wars fame as a sub? Although Darth Vader would clearly have made a much better Dom than a sub. [:D] I do have to wonder if Prince Charming would have mopped Cinderalla's floors for her. Nah, he'd have had under sublings for that! [;)] - pixel

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

2.929688E-02