julietsierra
Posts: 1841
Joined: 9/26/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Noah Is the desire to offer good counsel for the benefit of another person a matter of "having cake"? Is everything in life the other person's decision and also a reflection on your worth? A whole lot of unwaranted assumptions seem to be reflected in that paragraph. I'm confident that the OP is as aware of this as you are. He didn't ask what edicts to hand down at the end of a relationship, did he? He seemed to me to be seeking advice about advice to give, which strikes me as a pretty caring thing to busy himself with. Furthermore he presented a hypothetical situation and yet, with no details provided, you indict him for not caring about someone, not seeing value in someone. It is possible to see towering value in someone with whom for some set of reasons one is moving out of a strict power exchange relationship. I would imagine that for some submissives, having seen enough value in a man to once accept his collar, they might very well be willing to hear his counsel at a time when a collar is coming off. They might be grateful instead of bitter and accusatory. They might well return to him for further advice as years go by, and offer to be a friend to him as well. I hope the day comes when this sort of outcome becomes possible for you too, Juliet. Why thank you for your concern Noah. That's very kind. However, the assumption that I see you reflecting (and I may indeed be wrong) is that my views are coming from a place of insecurity or bitterness or something along those lines, which is very far from the truth. I simply operate along a different set of values than perhaps you do. I have remained friends with people I've been involved with often in the past, whether they were vanilla relationships or BDSM relationships. However, once it has been agreed that I am uncollared - whether through a pre-arranged time or through release, that person has abdicated his responsibility and his right to encourage me to do anything unless, as I already stated, I grant that he may. That, by no means discounts that this person was my friend, confidant, dominant, Master. It doesn't mean that he won't continue to be my friend. However, it does mean that I will not be seeking his advice regarding my future. For whatever reason, if he's decided that the relationship we had needs to be absolved, then all of what constituted control is absolved - including any well-intentioned advice he may have for me. When I am in a D/s relationship, I give my all to that person. I don't hold back, keep parts of myself for myself or set up precautions, or whatever it is that people do to "protect" themselves. I have no exceptions, no qualifications, no nothing along those lines. In the situation I'm in now, I promised to be there until he tells me to leave. Those were my exact words. I meant it. It wasn't romanticized verbage. There was nothing that said "unless you do this or that." The only qualification I put on my length of stay with him was "until you tell me to leave." Because of that, if something like what was described by the original poster were to happen, it would not be in my best interests to continue any part of the Master/slave dynamic and looking to him for advice or accepting from him some sort of "encouragement" would do just that. This may not be the way you would handle things, and it might not be the way other people would handle things, but in my world, before I met him, I was able to take care of myself, make decisions for myself, and manage my life. I didn't look for someone to save me. I submitted. That's really all there was to it. If I were released, even under good intentions, I would go back to being able to take care of myself (indeed, I've never stopped that), make decisions for myself and manage my life. Since it's pretty much a given that I would be hurting, taking his encouragement at a time when we're each finding our footing on our own again would be contrary to my overall sense of personal health. I am a submissive. I am his slave. I submit. It's really that uncomplicated. If I were released - even under good intentions, I would not be submitting. As such, his advice would not be something I'd seek or welcome. At that point, and from that point on, I'd no longer be interested in his perspective regarding how I should live my life. It's simply not germain to what I would need to do. What I would be doing is processing the relationship to find what was intrinsic to the relationship and what is intrinsic to me. What was intrinsic to the relationship, I let go of; what's intrinsic to me, I keep for myself and integrate into my own personal philosophy regarding what I find important in this lifestyle. Accepting his "encouragement" would only serve to continue to reinforce what was intrinsic to the relationship. So, again, while I understand your perspective and thank you for your concern, I sincerely hope I NEVER reach the point where the person who has decided he no longer wants me - for whatever reason, from retirement to illness to moving to incompatibility - were to continue to have control over my life by simply calling what he was doing "encouragement." He won't be asked by me for it and his unsolicited "encouragement" would not be welcome. I have many friends who are dominant, and this subject really does not come up. I do not ask their advice regarding my life. I didn't do so when I was on my own, I don't do it now and I can't imagine me doing so if I were to be released, so I don't see how remaining the friend of the person who I once served should be any different. And I don't think that knowing myself and what's healthy for me is something I should anticipate not being able to handle. As far as being his friend, I don't see the problem in that either. Then again, I also don't define my friendships by how much a man - a dominant - will or will not bare his soul. Again, that may be different for other people. I don't know. All I know is how I am. juliet
< Message edited by julietsierra -- 12/25/2006 8:22:12 PM >
|