sleazy
Posts: 781
Joined: 11/23/2006 From: UK Status: offline
|
Cloned meat, milk, or wheat grown for bread is to my eyes little different from the selectively bred products we have consumed for centuries. As I read I get the impression that your issue is not actually with the cloning or how natural it may be, but the right to choose based on labelling, would that be correct? To me it makes little difference, waking up every morning assumes risks to my long term health, and not waking up would be just the same. Perhaps I might eat something from a cloned source and contract some nasty problem, but I do not think it any more likely than eating something from a source with a reducing rather than static gene-pool. At the end of the day it is for me to worry about here and now, next week is a lesser priorty, 40 years down the line is even much less in my mind 99% of the time. The only way to test anything, not just GM foodstuffs is in the field, that applies to computers, air travel, motor cars, and drugs. As a test facility for anything the lab is a poor choice
< Message edited by sleazy -- 12/28/2006 5:09:25 PM >
_____________________________
Opinion is packaged by weight not volume, contents may settle during transit. Consult you medical practitioner. Do not attempt to stop moving parts by hand. Ensure all safety shields in place. Open this way up. Do not expose to temperatures exceeding 50C
|