RE: Female Dominants

RE: Female Dominants (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

SaintAllie -> RE: Female Dominants (12/30/2006 2:31:13 AM)
grins.. hiya cyberdude.. dislike me yet?..I'm blunt.. and I say so..want a pricerange? I won't give you one.. regards Allie

GoddessGreed -> RE: Female Dominants (12/30/2006 6:10:59 AM)
Goddess Greed, you are right women would not pay, is that in itself not a proponent of Female Superiority. Life is good. life is wonderful!!! ( stil havent worked out the quote thing!)

cyberdude611 -> RE: Female Dominants (12/30/2006 6:24:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SaintAllie grins.. hiya cyberdude.. dislike me yet?.. Why would i dislike you? quote: ORIGINAL: GoddessGreed ( stil havent worked out the quote thing!) The little button on the top right hand side of each post. One of the buttons says, "Quote." Click that.

SaintAllie -> RE: Female Dominants (12/30/2006 8:13:51 AM)
It was a wee joke there cyberdude:) heheheh... Allie

GoddessGreed -> RE: Female Dominants (12/30/2006 8:15:57 AM)
The little button on the top right hand side of each post. One of the buttons says, "Quote." Click that. [/quote] like this?

GoddessGreed -> RE: Female Dominants (12/30/2006 8:17:10 AM)
aagghhhhh how do you get just a certain amount of the persons text?

cyberdude611 -> RE: Female Dominants (12/30/2006 8:27:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: GoddessGreed aagghhhhh how do you get just a certain amount of the persons text? When you click that little "quote" button, a new window opens up and automatically puts in the other person's text. You can delete parts of it that way. If you can't find the button... If you see the post you want to respond to, look at the poster's username, just above it is a title bar that has the name of the thread. In this case "RE: Female Dominants". Now follow that title bar all the way across to the right. You will see buttons that say "Reply" "Quote" and "Fwd." Click the "Quote" button and a new window should open. If you have a pop-up blocker, it may be blocking the window from opening. So you may need to turn it off for a minute. And don't erase the html code that is automatically put in. Otherwise it wont work right.

nephandi -> RE: Female Dominants (12/30/2006 9:00:17 AM)
First of all there is alot more egar submissives than there is skilled femle Dominants, and therefore there is a marked, some of theese skilled women can take money to aply their skills just like other artists or craftsmen, what is wrong whit that. Also some might not want a relationship, they just want to indulge their kinky intrests and if they can do that and get peied, what is wrong whit that? And one more thing, for some, tributes, economical slavery and so on is part of their fetish and in my opinion, as long as a fentish is not forced upon somone unwilling, it is ok. i am submissive by nature. But i am also a sadist. i would like to find somone to top, then i would not realy be interested in a relationship past frindship, i already have a relationship whit my future Master. i would like somone that i could give pain, nothing more. And should i develop my skills to the point where somone might pay for that, i dont see somthing wrong whit it. i understand it can be frustrating to not find what one is looking for, but OP just keep looking and eventualy you will find somone that want a relationship of the same type you do, but pleese, dont consider everyone that dont want the same type of relationship as you do to be fake.

Stephann -> RE: Female Dominants (12/30/2006 9:15:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: GoddessGreed IAlso notice how this seems to be exclusive to female dominants. You don't see male dominants ever demanding monetary gifts from their female subs. Financial Domination is a kink. Sure, people do it. Actually, female slaves and male Dominants (and vanilla folk for that matter) engage in it by handing over paychecks, or simply permitting their male to manage all of the finances of the house - it just doesn't happen over the internet. The internet version that 'money mistresses' and male slaves is obviously a consensual, exploitative kink. Nobody holds a gun to the guys head. Personally, I find it as repugnant as the mentioned 'Feeder' kink (taking on obese slaves and preying on their insecurities and emotional problems to double their weight before leaving them) and way worse than diaper play, scat, or CBT. Stephan

cyberdude611 -> RE: Female Dominants (12/30/2006 11:07:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: nephandi First of all there is alot more egar submissives than there is skilled femle Dominants, and therefore there is a marked, some of theese skilled women can take money to aply their skills just like other artists or craftsmen, what is wrong whit that. Also some might not want a relationship, they just want to indulge their kinky intrests and if they can do that and get peied, what is wrong whit that? And one more thing, for some, tributes, economical slavery and so on is part of their fetish and in my opinion, as long as a fentish is not forced upon somone unwilling, it is ok. i am submissive by nature. But i am also a sadist. i would like to find somone to top, then i would not realy be interested in a relationship past frindship, i already have a relationship whit my future Master. i would like somone that i could give pain, nothing more. And should i develop my skills to the point where somone might pay for that, i dont see somthing wrong whit it. i understand it can be frustrating to not find what one is looking for, but OP just keep looking and eventualy you will find somone that want a relationship of the same type you do, but pleese, dont consider everyone that dont want the same type of relationship as you do to be fake. There is a difference between pro-dommes and what is termed "financial domination." A pro-domme provides a "service" in exchange for something, usually money. In financial domination the domme simply takes the money, spends it, and gives nothing in return. That is very similar to what a "gold-digger" does.

nephandi -> RE: Female Dominants (12/30/2006 12:41:01 PM)
Sorry for my poor English, yes it is, i know the differance. However the differance between a fincancial Dominant and a gold-digger is that a gold-digger is dishonest usualy, marrying a man for his money, while msot finacial Dominants is honest and say, yes i want your mony to have a relationship whit you, then it is the sub`s choice if he will give her that money. As long as she is not thriking him and none is holding a gun to his head and he knows what he is getting into, what is wrong whit that?

Laura -> RE: Female Dominants (12/30/2006 1:26:07 PM)
I'd lose respect for a man if I dominated everything about him. If he wants to give me his wallet I am likely to take it and spend it. But, I won't think the same of him. If he makes himself something I just use I will lose interest in him. I want a male sub who isn't a robot or a yes man.

Laura -> RE: Female Dominants (12/30/2006 1:34:19 PM)
ORIGINAL: nephandi First of all there is alot more egar submissives than there is skilled femle Dominants, There are a lot of female Doms who can't find a male sub who understands how to serve her. Men think they are serving Dommes when in fact they are getting what they want/ need while she is performing a chore. I laugh when I read about how few Dommes there are for male subs. Eager was the right word to use, cause they are, very eager to be served. They will even tell a woman how she should be dressed while serving them. No wonder the woman providing this service begin to think they should be getting paid .

nephandi -> RE: Female Dominants (12/30/2006 1:57:14 PM)
Well we were talking aboute a man compleing aboute Dominants that took money, that made me belive he was after some fun and games and there are more sumbissives out for fun and games than there are Dominats out for fun and games of that type, or at least it seams that way. Now yes pepole for serious relationships that is dificult to find on either side. P.S. OP this is nto an insult, i dont know anything aboute you and i dont say you are this or that way.

GoddessMayhem1 -> RE: Female Dominants (12/30/2006 2:19:26 PM)
Why is it that males who are not financial slaves have such a difficult time understanding the fetish...they can understand the other objectification fetishes where there are those who seek to be objectified as toilets, footstools, ashtrays, etc...but let there be males out there who seek to be objectified as atms, wallets, piggybanks, etc., suddenly it's not understood or accepted. It was said here that a financial domme is like a gold digger, taking all the males money and giving nothing in return...lol...if there were no such thing as moneyslaves wanting the rush of sending money or gifts with no guarantee of the dommes attentiong in ret rurn, then how can anyone else say that the rush these males get is not getting something in return...ppl need to stop judging and guessing and start researching..otherwise they come across as hypocrites.

Firsttime -> RE: Female Dominants (12/30/2006 10:19:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: GoddessMayhem1 Why is it that males who are not financial slaves have such a difficult time understanding the fetish...they can understand the other objectification fetishes where there are those who seek to be objectified as toilets, footstools, ashtrays, etc...but let there be males out there who seek to be objectified as atms, wallets, piggybanks, etc., suddenly it's not understood or accepted. It was said here that a financial domme is like a gold digger, taking all the males money and giving nothing in return...lol...if there were no such thing as moneyslaves wanting the rush of sending money or gifts with no guarantee of the dommes attentiong in ret rurn, then how can anyone else say that the rush these males get is not getting something in return...ppl need to stop judging and guessing and start researching..otherwise they come across as hypocrites. Well said bravo!

MuscleyandCute -> RE: Female Dominants (12/31/2006 4:06:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: GoddessGreed IAlso notice how this seems to be exclusive to female dominants. You don't see male dominants ever demanding monetary gifts from their female subs. No because women wouldnt pay lol I would suggest you edit that to 'No because women dont tend to have a financial Domination fetish' in order to cohere with the whole Financial Domination is a genuine fetish argument. Otherwise these very words from the mouth of a financial Dominatrix herself are somewhat re-enforcing the anti financial Domination assertation that it is down to demand/supply, while it is quite clear to someone of intelligence that any genuine fetish is innate of the person who seeks it and little to do with a marketplace knowing that sexuality is sexuality. Unless of course you would like to argue that the sudden fluctuation of my Stocks and Shares on the NASDAQ gave me the strange unexplainable desire to put a prize turnip up my bottom for pleasure. I hope someone here is intelligent enough to understand what I just said.

GoddessGreed -> RE: Female Dominants (12/31/2006 4:10:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MuscleyandCute quote: ORIGINAL: GoddessGreed IAlso notice how this seems to be exclusive to female dominants. You don't see male dominants ever demanding monetary gifts from their female subs. No because women wouldnt pay lol I would suggest you edit that to 'No because women dont tend to have a financial Domination fetish' in order to cohere with the whole Financial Domination is a genuine fetish argument. Otherwise these very words from the mouth of a financial Dominatrix herself are somewhat re-enforcing the anti financial Domination assertation that it is down to demand/supply, while it is quite clear to someone of intelligence that any genuine fetish is innate of the person who seeks it and little to do with a marketplace knowing that sexuality is sexuality. Unless of course you would like to argue that the sudden fluctuation of my Stocks and Shares on the NASDAQ gave me the strange unexplainable desire to put a prize turnip up my bottom for pleasure. I hope someone here is intelligent enough to understand what I just said. yawn! The fact that i added a 'lol' to my post , actually meant it was said in fun ....now wheres that smiley with the rolling eyes!

AquaticSub -> RE: Female Dominants (12/31/2006 4:15:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: GoddessGreed IAlso notice how this seems to be exclusive to female dominants. You don't see male dominants ever demanding monetary gifts from their female subs. No because women wouldnt pay lol ( dam how do you do that bloody quote thing!) My dominant doesn't demand I pay tribute or any such thing but amazingly he rarely buys his own beer. Aqua gives treats because she loves! And because it's tasty to steal a few bottles :-)

GoddessGreed -> RE: Female Dominants (12/31/2006 4:24:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: cyberdude611 [ When you click that little "quote" button, a new window opens up and automatically puts in the other person's text. You can delete parts of it that way. If you can't find the button... If you see the post you want to respond to, look at the poster's username, just above it is a title bar that has the name of the thread. In this case "RE: Female Dominants". Now follow that title bar all the way across to the right. You will see buttons that say "Reply" "Quote" and "Fwd." Click the "Quote" button and a new window should open. If you have a pop-up blocker, it may be blocking the window from opening. So you may need to turn it off for a minute. And don't erase the html code that is automatically put in. Otherwise it wont work right. thanks cyberdude! i finally worked it out, duh! lol

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.09375