RE: Female Dominants (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


MuscleyandCute -> RE: Female Dominants (12/31/2006 4:29:42 AM)

quote:


Sorry for my poor English, yes it is, i know the differance. However the differance between a fincancial Dominant and a gold-digger is that a gold-digger is dishonest usualy, marrying a man for his money, while msot finacial Dominants is honest and say, yes i want your mony to have a relationship whit you, then it is the sub`s choice if he will give her that money. As long as she is not thriking him and none is holding a gun to his head and he knows what he is getting into, what is wrong whit that?


There is nothing wrong at all with that.  Its a shame that its not easy for a Gold-Digger meaning that she cant be honest.  Im sure that if she could feesably be honest about her motivations while at the same time achieving her goals she would.............but until that happens she will not be looked at favourably I am afraid. 




MuscleyandCute -> RE: Female Dominants (12/31/2006 4:42:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessGreed

quote:

ORIGINAL: MuscleyandCute

quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessGreed


IAlso notice how this seems to be exclusive to female dominants. You don't see male dominants ever demanding monetary gifts from their female subs.


No because women wouldnt pay lol


I would suggest you edit that to 'No because women dont tend to have a financial Domination fetish' in order to cohere with the whole Financial Domination is a genuine fetish argument.  Otherwise these very words from the mouth of a financial Dominatrix herself are somewhat re-enforcing the anti financial Domination assertation that it is down to demand/supply, while it is quite clear to someone of intelligence that any genuine fetish is innate of the person who seeks it and little to do with a marketplace knowing that sexuality is sexuality.   Unless of course you would like to argue that the sudden fluctuation of my Stocks and Shares on the NASDAQ gave me the strange unexplainable desire to put a prize turnip up my bottom for pleasure.  

I hope someone here is intelligent enough to understand what I just said.





yawn! The fact that i added a 'lol' to my post , actually meant it was said in fun ....now wheres that smiley with the rolling eyes!


Whoops! yes of course, my mistake lol! I didnt realize.  It was said in fun so you didnt really mean to say that female subs dont do financial domination because they just wouldnt pay.  I wish I didnt take things people say so seriously by reading what they say!  and there was silly old me thinking that the 'lol' was just that you found what you feel is a fact to be amusing as opposed to the truth which is that the lol was just there because the sentence you wrote was not actually something you feel is a fact and totally invalid for any seriousness other than just a fun joke!   *Kicks myself and slaps forehead* I really need to lighten up! lol




QuietlySeeking -> RE: Female Dominants (12/31/2006 4:45:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessGreed

Goddess Greed, you are right women would not pay, is that in itself not a proponent of Female Superiority. Life is good.

life is wonderful!!! ( stil havent worked out the quote thing!)


Hasn't everyone figured out yet that men and women aren't wired the same?  Male submissives require different treatment than female submissives....at least that's what I've come to realize from talking with Domme friends of mine.  She is welcome to her Female Superiority and I'm welcome to my Dominance, and never the twain shall meet! LOL




MuscleyandCute -> RE: Female Dominants (12/31/2006 4:51:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: QuietlySeeking

quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessGreed

Goddess Greed, you are right women would not pay, is that in itself not a proponent of Female Superiority. Life is good.

life is wonderful!!! ( stil havent worked out the quote thing!)


Hasn't everyone figured out yet that men and women aren't wired the same?  Male submissives require different treatment than female submissives....at least that's what I've come to realize from talking with Domme friends of mine.  She is welcome to her Female Superiority and I'm welcome to my Dominance, and never the twain shall meet! LOL



Good point, and to find out what a Domme really wants you should ask a male sub.  Or hang on was it the other way round?  Like if you want to find out what a sub wants you should ask a sub and if you want to know what a Domme wants you should ask a Domme, Im well confused now!!




GoddessGreed -> RE: Female Dominants (12/31/2006 4:54:45 AM)

I do so apologise muscleyandcute ( is that what your mum calls you? lol) for not thinking more about my wording *rolls eyes* what i meant to say is, it appears that it isnt so much a fetish for women....therefore women wouldnt pay!




GoddessGreed -> RE: Female Dominants (12/31/2006 5:04:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MuscleyandCute



Good point, and to find out what a Domme really wants you should ask a male sub.  Or hang on was it the other way round?  Like if you want to find out what a sub wants you should ask a sub and if you want to know what a Domme wants you should ask a Domme, Im well confused now!!


I dont care what a male sub wants! In my opinion he chooses to be a sub, and thats where his choices end! I care about what i want, and I expect him to too..but then thats just my opinion...there are so many different opinions from different people that I dont think there are any rights and wrongs




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125