RE: now you're twisting sissy's words again ... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity

[Poll]

Sissy Maid Poll #1


(a) placed in a removable chastity device
  50% (96)
(b) placed in a permanent chastity device
  27% (52)
(c) castrated
  21% (41)


Total Votes : 189
(last vote on : 7/16/2013 1:49:49 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )


Message

onceburned -> RE: now you're twisting sissy's words again ... (3/30/2005 8:04:32 AM)

quote:

It is purely a linguistic, semantic or logical point ... and sissy is now done with it.


So am I. We have beaten the dead horse til our arms are tired. Its time to end it.

Peace.



stef -> RE: justifying being released from chastity (3/30/2005 4:25:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sissymaidlola

quote:

Isn't it interesting how people who claim to have such an interest in chastity are always searching for some 'medical' reasons to justify being released?

And isn't it interesting how you NEVER make a positive contribution to anyone's thread, stef, but merely post your one-line passive-aggressive observations wherever you read.

Interesting? Perhaps. Especially if it were true.

~stef



cynthiamarie -> RE: Sissy Maid Poll #1 (3/30/2005 7:35:04 PM)

Bwahahahahaha......oh, Sissy! i just love reading your "epic posts"!!!! You have been such a fount of information for me and i really appreciate it. Thanks for making all of us think, too.

i voted for the first option. i'm new and a sub...but!...someone i really like to chat with has this as his secret fantasy. Nobody's going to bonk me on the head and call me shallow or a player, are they? Because i've been topping him...*smirk*

i was only trying to understand what it would like to be on the other side of the fence, and when He choked on something i said and blushed, i couldn't help it. It's not sexually arousing to me yet, but there's something very satisfying and safe about being the one in control and making His fantasies come alive, and giving Him some new ones. It's very enjoyable to drive him to the brink and make Him stop, and torment Him a little. At first i couldn't really "get" the fantasy of it, but i enjoy stealing Superman's cape...especially if he's still a Dom with everyone else and i'm the only one who KNOWS that subbie part of Him. (Don't hurt me, lol, i'm not toying with a teenybopper, it's a Dom who's been into this lifestyle for more than 10 years...and i'm starting to hook into his fantasy myself. i'm the only one who has topped Him. *smiles*)

In vanilla life, i had carte blanche most of the time; i enjoyed dragging things out for hours and doing some orgasm control...that has always been satisfying to me. The concept of having so much power over a man that He could actually stay sexually faithful to me is....very sexy. i couln't imagine ever making Him wear His chastity device for periods of time longer than...when i saw that an attitude adjustment had taken place. Or when it wasn't doing something to enhance what he needed to feel emotionally. Some slight taunting/teasing so He could feel my power over Him....*grins*...i like it. But only with Him; i haven't met anyone else i've enjoyed this kind of play with.

quote:

what exactly turns Her on about the concept of controlling the erections and releases of the male submissive(s) in Her life.

The ultimate turn-on for me...doing the impossible...making a man find it impossible to cheat on me or treat me with disrespect, and be totally MINE. It's much better if He fought it at first, so i'd know that His commitment to me was difficult to make and not just freely given out to some different woman every few months.

quote:

So many Dominant Females claim that They like Their sub males manly (rather than feminized) ... yet how manly is a totally meek and docile male ? Does body hair and clothes constitute real masculinity in Their mind, or male attitude ? Personally, sissy would have thought an independently-minded but sometimes unruly maid (that is responsive to punishments such as spankings, etc.) would be more of a control challenge than a castrated doormat for such Dommes. Surely, the more power that a male has to have taken away from him in a TPE D/s relationship, the more of a turn-on it is for the Domme taking that power from him. But, hey, what does sissy know about these things ?


Sissy, you have given me so much to think about that i can barely talk or think. (i'm blonde, so yes...i meant to say that in that order, lol.) i'm so very new to this lifestyle and i don't know what i'll be next year because i'm changing so much. i've had panic attacks and PTSD for almost my entire 40 years and feeling secure/safe/relaxed/trusting around Dominants is a totally new concept for me...but when He acts that way with me, giving me all the control, i can't fear Him and i'm learning that He's to be trusted. i love male body hair, the difference in textures (i'm a Taurus, lol) and the fact that He's big enough to protect me if i require it...my own bodyguard. The power can be given away without altering appearances any, so i separate those. Maybe that's just my excuse for admitting to some shallowness. Take my feelings with a grain of salt, because this is only happening over the internet and not in person; this whole thing has made me think about things as i've never had to before. It's hard to learn what you want and need, and try to do the same for your sub.

i've had sissies as my friends before but they were all gay. We used to ride on my motorcycle and catcall at the guys. *blushes* They were better at being feminine, at makeup, what was the latest style, and even knowing the best seat in the restaraunt, lol. This was not something they did to please me, or their love interests, but to please themselves. Be the best that they could be. So it's hard to think of a man becoming a sissy just to be more pleasing to me...and i'll have to start mulling that over; i would never have thought of it on my own since i could never be in that position myself. it's much easier to understand things if you've been there yourself a bit, at least it is for me.

At this point in my life, i NEED to be be submissive...i go all crazed when giving up my power to someone i like and look up to. It's also intensely sexually arousing beyond belief, lol. i don't think i could ever give that up to be a Domme...so maybe i'll grow up to be a Switch...or a subbie who was curious for a while.

Sissy, i could really use your help understanding something that's a bit *rolls eyes at self* OT for this thread...maybe. i don't understand the need He has for the humiliation part of being turned from a Dom into a subbie/sissy...the sexual thrill. It's difficult for me, but i'm very subtle and creative so He likes what i do very much...but i really need to understand this better or sooner or later i won't be able to make/keep Him happy. To me, the threat of having my kink be exposed at work or to my friends would throw me into a panic, and i would loathe someone for holding that over my head...so how in the word does a man get off on that? If it's too OT to help me out in here, would you please put a note in my CM mailbox to help me understand this? Links of where it's been discussed? Anything at all, lol. i've been reading at wizdomme and trying to get my hands on The Loving Dominant, so i am trying to do my homework as best as i can. i'm very fond of Him and want to keep Him happy...and our time together is very healing to me...to my sense of security.

i will accept other points of view, but please...nobody flame the "bad" subbie for topping a Dom. He's a r/l friend of a friend of mine, and i don't think He comes here to CM....i am not trying to top any Doms here. However, if any Doms or Switches could explain to me about the thrill of humiliation...and where i could look to understand this better...i'd appreciate it.

Sissy, i hope you don't mind my barging into your thread like this. i can't wait to read more or your opinions around the boards...you're very opinionated and can really state your case.

cynthiamarie

OMG...i missed page 4!!! *goes off to read!*




sissymaidlola -> RE: stealing Superman's cape (4/1/2005 2:55:31 PM)

quote:

If it's too OT to help me out in here, would you please put a note in my CM mailbox to help me understand this? <snip> Sissy, i hope you don't mind my barging into your thread like this.

Hi cynthiamarie,

Thanks for making your post, hun, and you didn't barge into the thread. Ooooh, maybe that should be "Your post" since sissy is now addressing a budding Domme! <giggles>. WRT your questions sissy will PM you on the other side as an initial go-around. sissy Just wanted to respond to your post here first so that it was acknowledged and not left hanging out there ... and he may come back and edit this post further once we've exchanged PMs. [:)]

Curtsies,

sissy maid lola

[image]local://upfiles/21203/7550AAD373274EA8911F0BC3852D002C.jpg[/image]



sissymaidlola -> RE: beating a dead horse :) (4/2/2005 2:34:23 PM)

quote:

We have beaten the dead horse til our arms are tired.

Be very careful when you talk about beating a dead horse on this site, chris. Although flogging and beating are valid kinks, sissy suspects that overt references to bestiality and necrophilia violate the TOS ! [sm=lol.gif]

As you say, we've pretty well flogged the JAMA study to death, but if you come across any other information on this topic that adds to what we've already discussed please feel free to post it here. sissy Only found your post on the possible dangers of Peyronie's disease for those that regularly confine their genitals today (he was otherwise preoccupied with alternative areas of the boards at the time that you originally shared it) and it's not really getting the attention it deserves where it was posted. sissy Feels an obligation to temper any of the chastity and castration fantasy that has posted on this thread with at least some kind of reality check WRT the health dangers involved for those reading stuff here ... hence his motivation for making his A Health Warning post.

The possible danger of Peyronie's disease - no matter how remote - is something that sissy was totally unaware of until he read your post on that topic. So sissy thanks you for sharing that. Accordingly, sissy feels he also ought to introduce that topic on this thread so that there is also some reality balance to offset the fantasy - in the same way that he felt he had to mention the possible correlations between ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer - but he doesn't want to steal your thunder. Perhaps you would care to cross-post what you know on this condition here, and if you feel it merits further debate, perhaps we can also have that discussion here, too.

One of the other "questions" posed to the "experts" in the article to which you posted the URL seemed a little contrived (which is the way sissy has always felt about "Dear Abby" Q&A type columns) and tongue-in-cheek, so maybe the reasons that sissy has not heard about this condition before now is that it was a contrived topic for that Q&A article. If it is a possible serious risk, the least sissy would like to do WRT this condition is modify the Submissive Health Maintenance sections of his three posted chastity options to warn about the possible dangers of this condition. But he would like to understand the condition better first, and just as our discussion on the JAMA study (even though it was linguistically based rather than focused more on the medical side of things) nevertheless resulted in a better understanding of the issue all round, some discussion on Peyronie's condition may achieve similar effect.

One of the things that sissy feels needs emphasizing here is that no one is researching any of this stuff from the BDSM perspective. As Dr. Pavlovich was paraphrased in your Peyronie's condition article: "... no studies have been done on the short- or long-term effects of locking your cock up in an unyielding steel tube, which explains why you found so little about it on the Web." In other words, the BDSM community is considered too small (and possibly too weird and perverted!) to merit research for its own sake ... the community benefits only if these correlations are established by alternative research focus. Similarly, WRT to the topic of studying the possible correlations between male ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer, release of the seminal fluid by means of anal prostate "milkings" was NOT one of the methods of ejaculation investigated (and the fact that the JAMA study used the term "ejaculation" to cover nocturnal emissions was also somewhat misleading for those reading the study findings out of context and were therefore not familiar with the study's definition of terms).

As sissy has also pointed out previously, no one has studied the effect of someone having no orgasmic release for months on end. There was a classification (group A) in the JAMA study for those males having between 0 and 3 ejaculations a month (on average). Now someone filling in the questionnaires in that study that was playing around with enforced chastity and therefore experiencing zero "ejaculations" in back to back months, would just show up as a statistic in group A. But sissy suspects that it is HIGHLY UNLIKELY that such a person(s) participated in the study, and that most of the instances of reported "0-3 ejaculations / month" would either have been in the "1-3" range or, if zero in any given month, this person would then not fall into the zero classification in the next month. Which means that there is NO real data gathered by even the JAMA study on males that go, say, four to six consecutive months without a single orgasmic or nocturnal release, as anybody following sissy's options (b) or (c) would (or could).

Having a very low ejaculation rate (say an average of one ejaculation / month) for the duration of the study (and thereby showing up in group A) is NOT at all the same as having a zero ejaculation frequency for six months, and then possibly six releases in the next "furlough" period, and thereby still maintaining an average of one ejaculation / month. In fact, "furlough" periods are not even addressed by sissy's chastity option profiles. In other words, there is little in the JAMA study that can be applied to anyone indulging in long term chastity as defined by sissy's profiles for options (b) and (c), and they are in completely uncharted territory ... again, one of the reasons that caused sissy to make his A Health Warning post.

Anyway, sissy knows that others at CollarMe have found the information on prostate cancer risk as per the JAMA study report discussion useful because he has received PMs informing him of such. sissy Too had to become more informed on this topic - from the perspective of being able to determine what is simply urban legend versus what can be backed up by medical research - and so he too thanks you for introducing this topic here.

Best regards,

sissy maid lola

[image]local://upfiles/21203/7550AAD373274EA8911F0BC3852D002C.jpg[/image]



onceburned -> RE: beating a dead horse :) (4/2/2005 4:52:36 PM)

quote:

One of the things that sissy feels needs emphasizing here is that no one is researching any of this stuff from the BDSM perspective


Yes, this seems to be true. Perhaps because our community still regarded as disreputable. The gay community endured this same situation until fairly recently ( the last two or three decades)

Perhaps time will change this. <shrug> But in the mean time it could still be possible to do research which addresses such concerns. For example, medical studies involving self-reporting use doctors or nurses as subjects because they are believed to value the importance of honesty. Perhaps a long term chastity study could be done of Catholic or Orthodox priests and monks who are doctors and nurses. Presumably their rate of sexual activity is low (or lower than the general population) and their commitment to the medical field would limit any embarassment about accurately reporting their ejaculations.

In a different venue, we were discussing the Pravda whipping study which suggested that the release of natural brain chemicals for pain helped lift people out of depression. It was pointed out that doctors have long known that physical activity helps improve depression. And someone mentioned "the runners high" achieved from prolonged phyiscal exertion being similar to subspace, and a German study was mentioned that indicated that repetitive exercises had the same effect - possibly due to the release of endorphins.

This was all well and good, but someone mentioned that reaching subspace is never predictable and that mental state had much to do with it. Okay.... so couldn't a medical study be devised which tested subjects doing repetitive exercises or long distance running and also test their mental state? Perhaps the degree of control that an athlete has over the continuation of arduous exercise affects the release of chemicals? So an athlete who is committed to running 20 miles, and can not deviate from it is more likely to be in a state of mental surrender.... giving himself over to the process until its conclusion. In contrast an athlete who is not on a rigid training schedule can quit running whenever he feels like it.... or has to quit running if he receives a cell phone call (which is made after a random period of time every day). This second athlete might be less like to commit to a state of mental surrender.

Hmmm... well, it would be complex. But I bet something could be figured out. [:)]



GordonFreeman -> RE: beating a dead horse :) (4/3/2005 1:08:14 AM)


quote:

Most of the "questions" posed to the "experts" in the article to which you posted the URL did seem a little contrived (which is the way sissy has always felt about "Dear Abby" Q&A type columns) and tongue-in-cheek, so maybe the reasons that sissy has not heard about this condition before now is that it was a contrived topic for that Q&A article


In case you are interested:

Although I cannot find the URL on this page, I am sure you are talking about Dan Savage (Savage Love) as the topic this week was Peyronie's condition - and being a big fan of his, I want to give his column a little plug. As one of the most popular and respected syndicated sex columnist in America, (he reportedly gets 5000 questions per WEEK), contrived doesn't enter the equation. No doubt he is selective with the questions he answers, as they generally follow a theme, but you can be damn sure the questions are genuine and the advice first rate. He is also the editor of the local weekly, and the author of several excellent books, that may be of particular interest to followers of alternative lifestyles.



sissymaidlola -> RE: Dan Savage 'Savage Love' column (4/4/2005 9:56:57 PM)

quote:

Although I cannot find the URL on this page, I am sure you are talking about Dan Savage (Savage Love) as the topic this week was Peyronie's condition ...

Hi Gordon,

Yes, chris posted a link to the March 28 issue of Savage Love in a different forum which featured the Q&A on Peyronie's disease as the first of four Q&As on the web page (if there were other web pages beyond the main one sissy never read them). Quite frankly, sissy wasn't that impressed with the quality of either the questions or the answers given. The questions appeared like they could have been formulated by any troll starting a new thread on this site, and the answers were a little thin on detail. Take the Peyronie's disease Q&A ... all sissy was able to learn from it was that the condition is caused by a buildup of scar tissue in your penis that can cause it to curve to one side, making erections painful and, in some cases, impossible. There's no effective treatment for Peyronie's. Radiation therapy can decrease the amount of scar tissue, but unfortunately, it damages other tissues; surgery to cut out the scar tissue can lead to impotence. Oh yes, and the leading theory WRT the cause of this disease is trauma to a semi-erect penis.

That was all padded out to four paragraphs with banter. No references for sources or further reading were given, which was a little frustrating, yet probably par for the course when it comes to Q&A columns. But it wasn't the Peyronie's disease Q&A that sissy was calling a little contrived. In particular, it was the second question which was from a guy whose girlfriend's lesbian aunt had given a hand job to his girlfriend's grandfather (the aunt's own father) whom she was taking care of. sissy Has seen a couple of variants of the supposed dilemma behind such an action posted as questions in the past on Q&A forums, and so it was this one that raised the question of its true authenticity in sissy's mind. The remaining two Q&A were pretty tame, which probably weighs more to their authenticity than not - if one is going to make the questions up then why not make them a little sensational ?

So sissy shouldn't have said "most" in his post when only one of the Q&As caught his attention that way. If nothing else thanks for posting Your plug here so that sissy can now go fix that. Take care.

sissy maid lola

[image]local://upfiles/21203/7550AAD373274EA8911F0BC3852D002C.jpg[/image]



sissymaidlola -> RE: Especially if it were true. (4/8/2005 4:21:03 PM)

quote:

Interesting? Perhaps. Especially if it were true.

Having read many of your interractions elsewhere on other threads, not just this one, stef, sissy pretty much stands by the truth of what he posted. However, in the spirit of Douglas Adams, sissy is prepared to update his previously posted opinion of you as follows:

quote:

And isn't it interesting how you HARDLY EVER make a positive contribution to anyone's thread, stef, but instead merely post your one-line passive-aggressive observations wherever you read.

[sm=lol.gif][sm=lol.gif] Now it's true .... [sm=lol.gif][sm=lol.gif]

sissy maid lola

[image]local://upfiles/21203/7550AAD373274EA8911F0BC3852D002C.jpg[/image]



stef -> RE: Especially if it were true. (4/8/2005 10:05:28 PM)

Having been subjected to your incessant blathering on whatever flits into your vapid little mind, I'm prepared to tell you that you're still nothing more than a simpering pink nitwit.

~stef



sissymaidlola -> RE: Get a life (4/9/2005 9:54:05 AM)

quote:

Having been subjected to your incessant blathering on whatever flits into your vapid little mind, I'm prepared to tell you that you're still nothing more than a simpering pink nitwit.

My dear stef,

You are not subjected to anything ... if you don't like sissy's opinions on this thread then don't read it, and certainly don't post to it. It is that simple.

You have posted seven times to this thread and have yet to contribute anything positive or on topic here. If there ever was any debate going on in your case, certainly by stooping to ad hominem attacks, you just lost it. sissy Merely made the comment in passing that your posts are frequently passive-aggressive one or two line observations. Anyone reading a sizeable portion of your posts on these boards can see that is a true statement. They only have to read all your posts on this thread to see the truth in that statement. sissy Isn't passing judgement on you ... there are presumably some people that hold your kind of passive-aggressiveness to be a good thing.

But the overall body of your posts serves as proof of that statement. You, OTOH, will find it extremely difficult to convince anyone on these boards that sissy has a "vapid little mind." You may disagree with sissy - and you frequently go out of your way to do so - but that doesn't mean that there is any truth in that statement whatsoever. For someone that stands for nothing, and that cannot put more than two sentences together at a time, to have the audacity to call anyone else a "nitwit" is quite laughable. The term "pink" sissy accepts since his font is that color. As for the term "simpering" ... have you looked in the mirror recently, stef ? That term would appear to apply more to you than to sissy.

There really is a lot more to life than explaining to people that "dominate" isn't an adjective or a noun ... anyone you have to explain that to isn't actually worth your time nor energy. And spending all your time on these boards stalking dani so that you can pounce on anything he might say - which is what brought you to this thread in the first place - makes you one very small, warped person in most people's minds. Get a passion for something more worthwhile in your life, stef, than trying to elevate your own status by repeatedly putting others down.

sissy maid lola

[image]local://upfiles/21203/7550AAD373274EA8911F0BC3852D002C.jpg[/image]



stef -> Get a life? Oh, the irony! (4/9/2005 11:36:30 AM)

You're confused. Again.

I'm not trying to, nor do I have any interest in, engaging in a debate with you. I'm just pointing out where you're wrong. Besides, as I said recently to someone else here, I don't debate kooks.

~stef



BlkTallFullfig -> Can I Beg for Peace Here! (4/9/2005 2:26:26 PM)

Hey Ms Stef and Lola,
This back and forth negativity is such a waste of energy...
Couldn't we start playing nice now, please? M



sissymaidlola -> RE: I just came to flame (4/13/2005 2:57:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sissyslave71
I think castration is a little extreme. Unless you want a gender change.

ORIGINAL: sfgrrl
Castration wouldn't change your gender.

ORIGINAL: sissymaidlola
Hi, sfgrrl, that's a good point but it is NOT what sissyslave said now, is it ? What he wrote was that castration was "a little extreme ... unless you want a gender change." He didn't claim that castration CAUSED gender change ...

quote:

ORIGINAL: sfgrrl
Your mini-treatise on sissyhood notwithstanding, you're missing the point. Gender doesn't change, no matter what is done to the body and no matter what the reason for said physical alteration is.

ORIGINAL: sissymaidlola
No one is missing the point here because no one on this thread has claimed that castration changes gender.

ORIGINAL: sfgrrl
Again, you miss the point.

ORIGINAL: sissymaidlola
How can sissy possibly miss the point of his own thread ?

quote:

ORIGINAL: sfgrrl
I'm not sure how that's even remotely relevant, since I was never referring to the thread at large, but only to my reply to sissyslave71. The topic of the thread, and polls in general, really don't interest me all that much. <snip> I never had any doubt what this thread was about.

ORIGINAL: sissymaidlola
So how did you vote, stef ?

ORIGINAL: sfgrrl
I didn't.

So let's see now, stef. You admit that you are NOT interested in polls, NOR were you interested in the topic of this thread, and that you didn't vote in this poll. What that all translates to is that your only pathetic purpose for your initial OT post on this thread was to put words into dani's mouth that he never said in order that you could then disagree with them and make fun of him. That's pretty sad, stef. Please stop flaming this thread. You have made 8 posts here and none of them have been on topic nor contributed anything positive. Your last two posts were just pointless name calling.

Once again sissy is going to request that you refrain from posting on this thread. Besides, you have no reason to post here any more. Your continual hounding of dani is presumably one of the reasons he has now quit the boards. You should be very proud of yourself over that, stef! It must make you feel very good that all your negative effort hasn't been wasted. Way to go. Who's next on your shit list, stefie ?

sissy maid lola

[image]local://upfiles/21203/7550AAD373274EA8911F0BC3852D002C.jpg[/image]



onceburned -> RE: Can I Beg for Peace Here! (4/13/2005 5:18:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BlkTallFullfig

Hey Ms Stef and Lola,
This back and forth negativity is such a waste of energy...
Couldn't we start playing nice now, please? M


I think this is an excellent idea! [:)]



sissymaidlola -> RE: More on Peyronie's disease ... (4/15/2005 10:39:39 AM)

quote:

The possible danger of Peyronie's disease - no matter how remote - is something that sissy was totally unaware of until he read your post on that topic.


Boney Maroney

I got a Girl name of Boney Maroney
She's as skinny as a stick of macaroni
Oughta see Her rock'n'roll with Her blue jeans on
She's not very fat, just skin and bo-o-one

But I love Her, She loves me
Oh how happy now we can be
Makin' love underneath the apple tree

Well I beat my meat like it owes me money
There's now a cock cage on my unruly bunny
I wanna get married on a night in June
And rock and roll
By the light of the silvery moo-oo-oon

'Cause I want Her, She taunts me
Oh how happy now I could be
Makin' love when released from chastity

Woh-oh right
Oh!
Oh yeah
Ooh!
Wooh - hah

Now I've got the curse of old Frankie Peyronie *
I cannot get it up for my Boney Maroney
It bends to the left, never to the right
Playing with my Boney keeps me in pain all night

'Cause I want Her, She taunts me
Oh how happy now I could be
Makin' love when released from chastity

According to the quack, my dick's full of plaque
I'm never ever gonna be the same in the sack
So I kneel and pray on my rosary beads
That I might still 'meat' some of my Boney's needs

'Cause I want Her, She taunts me
Oh how happy now I could be
Makin' love when released from chastity

Woh-oh right
Oh!
Oh yeah
Ooh!
Wooh - hah

She's a real sexy Domme, She's my one and only
She's a real face slapper, She's my Boney Maroney
Everybody smirks when my Lady milks me
And everyone agrees it's quite something to see

'Cause I want Her, She taunts me
Oh how happy now I could be
Makin' love when released from chastity

She's my one and only, She's my soul's desire
She waxes my thighs and sets my heart on fire
Everybody turns when my Lady goes by-y
Her swats really sting and
They always make me cry-eye-eye

'Cause I want Her, She taunts me
Oh how happy now I could be
Makin' love when released from chastity


* Peyronie's disease was first described in 1704. It is named for Francois de la Peyronie, who, in 1743, described a patient who had "rosary beads of scar tissue to cause an upward curvature of the penis during erection."


The foregoing was adapted from the original ShaNaNa song lyrics and is the copyright ©2005 of Lola Croft.

sissy maid lola

[image]local://upfiles/21203/7550AAD373274EA8911F0BC3852D002C.jpg[/image]



sissymaidlola -> RE: Sur vos genoux, chienne ! (4/26/2005 7:29:46 AM)

quote:

Can I Beg for Peace Here!

Ohhh, WOW, Madame M, that's sooooo hot! It's not often that sissy gets to see a Mistress beg so he would absolutely adore to see You on Your knees in front of lola pathetically pleading Your case, Madame! Oh boy, this is such a turn on for sissy <giggles> ... Now get on Your knees, bitch, and start begging! [sm=lol.gif] LMAO

sissy maid lola

[image]local://upfiles/21203/7550AAD373274EA8911F0BC3852D002C.jpg[/image]



BlkTallFullfig -> RE: Sur vos genoux, chienne ! (4/26/2005 11:26:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sissymaidlola
quote:

Can I Beg for Peace Here!

Ohhh, WOW, Madame M, that's sooooo hot! It's not often that sissy gets to see a Mistress beg so he would absolutely adore to see You on Your knees in front of lola pathetically pleading Your case, Madame! Oh boy, this is such a turn on for sissy <giggles> ... Now get on Your knees, bitch, and start begging! [sm=lol.gif] LMAO

sissy maid lola

Hey Sissy,
Is this reverse psychology, your wanting me to tell you "Get on your knees Byotch?!"
I think you're trying to top me from the bottom; I do apreciate your doing it in French though.
Am glad to have given you a rise... Did it happen at work? Could your co workers see it? [sm=lol.gif]LMAO, M




sissymaidlola -> RE: Get on your knees Byotch?! (4/30/2005 1:47:44 PM)

quote:

Is this reverse psychology, your wanting me to tell you "Get on your knees Byotch?!"

Ooooh, now You have sissy's attention, Madame. It really presses sissy's buttons when You insult him in Transylvanian! [;)]

quote:

I think you're trying to top me from the bottom; I do apreciate your doing it in French though.

sissy Top from the bottom ... what, moi ? Ce qui prochain, Madame ? Cependant, il est très intéressant que vous écriviez maintenant dans le rose! [sm=lol.gif]

Respectfrilly Yours,

sissy maid lola

[image]local://upfiles/21203/7550AAD373274EA8911F0BC3852D002C.jpg[/image]



BlkTallFullfig -> RE: Get on your knees Byotch?! (4/30/2005 5:29:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sissymaidlola
sissy Top from the bottom ... what, moi ? Ce qui prochain, Madame ? Cependant, il est très intéressant que vous écriviez maintenant dans le rose! [sm=lol.gif]
sissy maid lola

I guess I like the color a little.
Anyway confession: You know I voted for your castration when you first began this thread because I was annoyed with you; I'm glad you didn't go with that option or all this flirting would be with one sans penis which I kind of like, [sm=lol.gif]. M



Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625