RE: Masters responsibilites to owned sub/slave

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Masters responsibilites to owned sub/slave

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: Masters responsibilites to owned sub/slave

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Masters responsibilites to owned sub/slave - 1/10/2007 5:43:16 AM

ardelle

Posts: 63
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heartfeltsub

While i agree with part of your premise that one must trust to believe that the other person is being honest, what i was really addressing is the fact that trust is a fragile thing, easily broken and not easily fixed, as i stated in my last post on this thread. It would be nice if once trust is given, it is always given wisely and is never violated, but i don't know many relationships that have that outcome. i am happy for those who have never experienced a violation of trust.

greetings

i went back and reread your original statement; i apologize, i had misread your words. i thought you were inferring that to have trust one must first have honesty.

_____________________________

i wish you well

josie

(in reply to heartfeltsub)

Profile

Post #: 41

RE: Masters responsibilites to owned sub/slave - 1/10/2007 5:55:18 AM

heartfeltsub

Posts: 1641
Joined: 11/5/2004
Status: offline

Thank you for your response, my intent wasn't entirely clear in the first posting.

(in reply to ardelle)

Profile

Post #: 42

RE: Masters responsibilites to owned sub/slave - 1/10/2007 12:23:08 PM

charismagirrl

Posts: 297
Joined: 8/30/2006
Status: offline

your point here regarding the results of betraying trust are really right on the money, imo.

Trust is so important in any realtionship and all too frequently that trust is broken in a major way which then makes it all the more difficult to trust the next person you encounter in a realationship. Honesty is also very imprtant and goes hand in hand with trust.

With all of that being said, a slave shouldn't control the Master/Mistress but if the "M" does things to betray the trust of the slave or if they are dishonest in a bad way (meaning not in that "little white lie" way to set up something or to teach a valuable lesson when all will be made clear afterward) Then the M will do a disservice to the relationship and to the mental/emotional state of the "s".

_____________________________

For today i won't say but...
For today i wont say just...
For today i will simply obey....
For today i will trust that You are right...
For always i will be your imperfect slave

http://www.mycollarspace.com

(in reply to heartfeltsub)

Profile

Post #: 43

RE: Masters responsibilites to owned sub/slave - 1/10/2007 2:31:43 PM

darkbigdaddy

Posts: 14
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline

Responsiblities? Well, think of it this way, "what are your responsiblities as a pet owner?" Sounds funny but... some people treat the dogs to the best meals, high end training and grooming. Take them everywhere and them on a pestal.
On the other hand, sound folk keep their dogs in the backyard, feed them and that is it.
Unlike a dog you have say in who your Master is. Pick wisely. You help define the relationship be choosing the person you hookup with. If your Master want to treat you like dirt he will, if he want to treat you like you are a doll, that's his choice. Your job is only to go with it.

(in reply to Master4slavlisa)

Profile

Post #: 44

RE: Masters responsibilites to owned sub/slave - 1/11/2007 5:28:16 AM

Kalira

Posts: 954
Joined: 10/9/2006
From: Fort Wayne Indiana
Status: offline

since Master and I do not live together, I would have to say that his actual responsibilities are a bit more limited than if we were living together.

_____________________________

Facilius Per Partes In Cognitionem Totius Adducimur
We are more easily led part by part to an understanding of the whole.
Seneca

Damnant Quod Non Intellegunt

(in reply to Master4slavlisa)

Profile

Post #: 45