perverseangelic
Posts: 2625
Joined: 2/2/2004 From: Davis, Ca Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Leonidas Hi perverse, Yeah, terms and trying to define them can wrap you around the axel faster than anything. In my terms, I'd say you belong to your owner (partner for you). You have discovered that you can serve another man as a slave and still belong to your owner (partner). That's not an uncommon discovery to make in my experience. Ownership and love go together for you. Service can be separate. When you say "maybe it's because the other man is second to my partner" I recognize that as something common in my experience. You are serving the other man as your owners slave (again, my terms). For many slave women, that's a big lesson to learn. Most fear that if they do serve the other man well, it will somehow mean that they are less devoted to their master. You are a brave young woman. You're coloring way outside the lines here. There's some good stuff outslde the lines. Thank you. I appreciate your compliments. I agree completely with the way you put things. I can serve, without guilt, because I know that I am my partners first. I could not belong to someone I didn't love, because to me, to belong to someone is to give him/her -everything- which (from my POV) must include your love. In order to say someone owns me, I need to be able to say that he owns my mind, my soul and my body. For some, this could occur without love, but I couldn't give -all- of my soul to someone I -didn't- love. Or something. It's all pretty confusing, and still pretty new. Frankly, I think it's an ideal situation, because everyone invovled is getting something they didn't have before. Ask me again in six months, though.
_____________________________
~in the begining it is always dark~
|