farglebargle -> RE: You, sir, have become the president who cried wolf. (1/12/2007 10:05:53 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: juliaoceania quote:
One could argue that that's what the Bush administration -- of which, to put it mildly, I am no fan -- has been doing to the American electorate since 9/11, but I'd see a big difference between that and, say, blowing up a bus full of schoolkids. In the sense in which I think most folks use it, "terrorism" needs to include some degree of violent acts, particularly against civilians. The USA has given blankets infected with small pox to my ancestors The USA trained mercenaries in South America to overthrow goverments so many times as to make one's heads spin. These people were trained at the School of the Americas (training camp for terrorists). Our government exterminated millions of Vietnamese. We have our troops in 138 countries... just to clarify what I am talking about. Remember during Reagan? School of the Americas, Guatamala, and Raped Nuns. We fucking wrote the book, didn't we? But we all know Bush is a Hypocrite. See Keith Olbermann's Special Comment a few days ago? quote:
From Keith Olbermann's Special Comment: Most importantly, perhaps, Mr. Bush, the plan fails because it still depends on your credibility. You speak of mistakes and of the responsibility “resting” with you. But you do not admit to making those mistakes. And you offer us nothing to justify this clenched fist toward Iran and Syria. In fact, when you briefed news correspondents off-the-record before the speech, they were told, once again, “if you knew what we knew … if you saw what we saw … ” “If you knew what we knew” was how we got into this morass in Iraq in the first place. The problem arose when it turned out that the question wasn’t whether we knew what you knew, but whether you knew what you knew. You, sir, have become the president who cried wolf. All that you say about Iraq now could be gospel. All that you say about Iran and Syria now could be prescient and essential. We no longer have a clue, sir. We have heard too many stories. Many of us are as inclined to believe you just shuffled the director of national intelligence over to the State Department because he thought you were wrong about Iran. Many of us are as inclined to believe you just put a pilot in charge of ground wars in Iraq and Afghanistan because he would be truly useful in an air war next door in Iran. Your assurances, sir, and your demands that we trust you, have lost all shape and texture. They are now merely fertilizer for conspiracy theories. They are now fertilizer, indeed. The pile has been built slowly and with seeming care. I read this list last night, before the president’s speech, and it bears repeating because its shape and texture are perceptible only in such a context. Before Mr. Bush was elected, he said nation-building was wrong for America. Now he says it is vital. He said he would never put U.S. troops under foreign control. Last night he promised to embed them in Iraqi units. He told us about WMD. Mobile labs. Secret sources. Aluminum tubes. Yellow-cake. He has told us the war is necessary: Because Saddam was a material threat. Because of 9/11. Because of Osama Bin Laden. Al-Qaida. Terrorism in general. To liberate Iraq. To spread freedom. To spread Democracy. To prevent terrorism by gas price increases. Because this was a guy who tried to kill his dad. Because — 439 words in to the speech last night — he trotted out 9/11 again. In advocating and prosecuting this war he passed on a chance to get Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi. To get Muqtada Al-Sadr. To get Bin Laden. He sent in fewer troops than the generals told him to. He ordered the Iraqi army disbanded and the Iraqi government “de-Baathified.” He short-changed Iraqi training. He neglected to plan for widespread looting. He did not anticipate sectarian violence. He sent in troops without life-saving equipment. He gave jobs to foreign contractors, and not Iraqis. He staffed U.S. positions there, based on partisanship, not professionalism. He and his government told us: America had prevailed, mission accomplished, the resistance was in its last throes. He has insisted more troops were not necessary. He has now insisted more troops are necessary. He has insisted it’s up to the generals, and then removed some of the generals who said more troops would not be necessary. He has trumpeted the turning points: The fall of Baghdad, the death of Uday and Qusay, the capture of Saddam. A provisional government, a charter, a constitution, the trial of Saddam. Elections, purple fingers, another government, the death of Saddam. He has assured us: We would be greeted as liberators — with flowers; As they stood up, we would stand down. We would stay the course; we were never about “stay the course.” We would never have to go door-to-door in Baghdad. And, last night, that to gain Iraqis’ trust, we would go door-to-door in Baghdad. He told us the enemy was al-Qaida, foreign fighters, terrorists, Baathists, and now Iran and Syria. He told us the war would pay for itself. It would cost $1.7 billion. $100 billion. $400 billion. Half a trillion. Last night’s speech alone cost another $6 billion. And after all of that, now it is his credibility versus that of generals, diplomats, allies, Democrats, Republicans, the Iraq Study Group, past presidents, voters last November and the majority of the American people. Oh, and one more to add, tonight: Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia. Mr. Bush, this is madness. You have lost the military. You have lost the Congress to the Democrats. You have lost most of the Iraqis. You have lost many of the Republicans. You have lost our allies. You are losing the credibility, not just of your presidency, but more importantly of the office itself. And most imperatively, you are guaranteeing that more American troops will be losing their lives, and more families their loved ones. You are guaranteeing it! This becomes your legacy, sir: How many of those you addressed last night as your “fellow citizens” you just sent to their deaths. And for what, Mr. Bush? So the next president has to pull the survivors out of Iraq instead of you? When he threw off the comment about Eastasia, I spit coffee all over my keyboard.
|
|
|
|