dawntreader -> RE: Old Doms.. What is your deal? (4/5/2007 9:32:03 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: dawntreader quote:
ORIGINAL: RobertCloud From another of the OLD Doms, though I personally in no way consider 45 as old, and find it an insult that some young immature child who has little business being out of her diapers should even think of calling me old. She is probably looking for someone to please her that has no experience and will wind up hurt because of the lack of knowledge, like another I knew wanting to get into asphyxiation and had no clue what she was doing, just asked questions online and did no other research, she nearly died. And the (Koukei) hair comment, (dancingjade) trailer trash comment, and more. These children need more than ass spankings, they need placed in stocks and good floggings and taught the true meaning of the lifestyle because their profiles show no submission what-so-ever. Little girls (Koukei and dancingjade), I am one Dominant that will pass you by, will not speak to you, will block you, will think I am lucky that two pieces of TRASH like you did not come my way because it is obvious you have more concern about yourself than the lifestyle or the weak dominants that you supposedly serve because they will most assuredly allow you to top them with your attitudes. Good day, i happen to agree with this. For those of us that feel "called" to submission, these girls cheapen it with their immature attitudes and their better than thou demeanor. i don't consider them submissives at all, just people looking for kink... quote:
quote: LuckyAlbatros quote: ORIGINAL: Zensee I don't see what you mean LA. I don't see anyone having their core values shaken here (not even the OP). Can you expand your thesis? Post #103, DawnTreader For those of us that feel "called" to submission, these girls cheapen it with their immature attitudes and their better than thou demeanor. i don't consider them submissives at all, just people looking for kink... Post #104, RobertCloud They are in the lifestyle for the kink as someone else has stated and that I do not mind, but I hate it when they claim to be something they are not. **** It seems fairly obvious we have people in this discussion who feel that unless others subscribe to their own versions of being ‘serious submissives’ that they somehow deserve to be treated rudely, called names and put down AND that it somehow cheapens whatever someone else chooses to do. No one can deny that some posters, including the OP, have expressed some immaturity, name-calling, rudeness and lack of structured disagreements. However, to respond with that exact same behavior in kind seems to do nothing but say that everyone is in the same pot calling the other side names This is an interesting thread to be ressurected...one i had stopped following after i had posted so i never saw the second quoted post here... i don't think i was impossing my beliefs on anyone nor do i feel the OP rocked my core values...but i do not retract my statement of opinion on the OP - as a person that does take a more spiritual approach to submission and the D/s(M/s) dynamic, i do feel people with her attitude "cheapen" submission and make it more of a "kink". That is merely my opinion which i believe i have as much right to post as she with her attention seeking diatribe. i do think at that point in the thread i may have been a bit fed up with the OP and felt compelled to agree with RobertCloud's statement but i can assure you, people that shallow don't rock my core...i don't allow them the power to do so~ j
|
|
|
|