Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Threat to world peace???????


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Threat to world peace??????? Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/22/2007 11:08:05 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
luckydog1:
Because I can tell the difference between a rich mans cow and a poor mans life I am somehow using poor people as pawns?????????
If the govt. drops food to starving people  they will just shit it out and make a mess....is that what you really ment to say???
thompson

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 241
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/22/2007 11:33:57 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Do you think the people of the United States would have been in favor of the war with Japan if they knew how Roosevelt maneuvered the Japanese into the attack on Pearl Harbor?


Perhaps you are interpreting the "dance of international diplomacy", and the calculations, miscalculations and such as "collusion and intent" with 20/20 hindsight, thompson.

It's alway easy to make judgement and see "patterns" years and decades after the facts.  It doesn't necessary make the judgements correct, or the patterns real or accurate, but it does give some people a feeling of power and special knowledge to point them out.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Did you know that of the 8 battleships sunk at Pearl Harbor only one stayed on the bottom (the Arizona) and that 6 of the remaining 7 were tactically operational in less than 6 months.  That all of the battle ships at Pearl Harbor were half the size of the the more modern battleships in the USN and that only two of the battleships sunk at Pearl Harbor had 16" guns while the rest mounted only 14" guns.  The hardware that the Japanese destroyed at  Pearl Harbor was antique junque.  The fact that the administration knew in advence of the attack they stocked the harbor with junque and prepared it so that it could be refloated and made operational with a minimum of effort.
thompson


Pure conspiracy theory.

FirmKY

_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 242
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/22/2007 11:47:15 AM   
missturbation


Posts: 8290
Joined: 2/12/2006
From: another planet
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: missturbation

My apologies emperor.
I truly believe though that the only topic worthy of discussion left in this thread  is getting high, twinkie, porn and having lots of sex!!
 
missturbation:
I am unsure of your use of the word twinkie....are you speaking of the little cakes filled with whipped cream or is there a more lacivious meaning that I am not aware of?
thompson

 
 



Twinkie is extremely extremely horny

_____________________________

What you don't witness with your eyes, don't witness with your mouth. Proverb.

If it fit's in a toaster, i can cook it.

Buying 10 item's or less is not shopping !!

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 243
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/22/2007 12:59:22 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Did you know that of the 8 battleships sunk at Pearl Harbor only one stayed on the bottom (the Arizona) and that 6 of the remaining 7 were tactically operational in less than 6 months.  That all of the battle ships at Pearl Harbor were half the size of the the more modern battleships in the USN and that only two of the battleships sunk at Pearl Harbor had 16" guns while the rest mounted only 14" guns.  The hardware that the Japanese destroyed at  Pearl Harbor was antique junque.  The fact that the administration knew in advence of the attack they stocked the harbor with junque and prepared it so that it could be refloated and made operational with a minimum of effort.
thompson


Pure conspiracy theory.

FirmKY


So whats the difference between a conspiracy and a conspiracy theory to you?  WHere do you draw that line?


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 244
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/22/2007 1:04:48 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I will point out that if I woof a phattie blunt, there is a good chance that I personally would become a threat to world peace...I get kinda anxious at them levels of cannabinabinol-----LOL

Is it a conspiracy?  it is only theory?  stay tuned.....

Ron 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 245
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/22/2007 1:44:30 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

So whats the difference between a conspiracy and a conspiracy theory to you?  WHere do you draw that line?


Real0ne,

I generally do not engage in discussions about conspiracy theories, or at least, I am very careful when doing so for the simple fact that such beliefs are akin to religious beliefs.

No amount of discussion will dissuade someone who believes in them, and they generally get rather - irrate - when challenged.

I attempted to engage you on this subject several threads ago, when I asked you specific questions about the "USS Liberty" incident and a few other things, but I was ignored.

There are conspiracy theories, and then there is the elements of common human desires and drives that often seem to act as conspiracies. 

Perhaps a small difference in final outcomes, but a big difference in attitude and the understanding of history, and how to affect change, and where to place blame or credit.

FirmKY


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 246
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/22/2007 1:49:11 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

So whats the difference between a conspiracy and a conspiracy theory to you?  WHere do you draw that line?


Real0ne,

I generally do not engage in discussions about conspiracy theories, or at least, I am very careful when doing so for the simple fact that such beliefs are akin to religious beliefs.

No amount of discussion will dissuade someone who believes in them, and they generally get rather - irrate - when challenged.

I attempted to engage you on this subject several threads ago, when I asked you specific questions about the "USS Liberty" incident and a few other things, but I was ignored.

There are conspiracy theories, and then there is the elements of common human desires and drives that often seem to act as conspiracies. 

Perhaps a small difference in final outcomes, but a big difference in attitude and the understanding of history, and how to affect change, and where to place blame or credit.

FirmKY



oh?

do you remember where it was?  i missed it


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 247
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/22/2007 1:49:15 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

luckydog1:
Because I can tell the difference between a rich mans cow and a poor mans life I am somehow using poor people as pawns?????????
If the govt. drops food to starving people  they will just shit it out and make a mess....is that what you really ment to say???
thompson


Bluntly, yes tompson...the plan decided on by the people of New Orleans before the storm was that everyone had to be evacuated, if the leeves failed.  That plan obviously failed, some were left behind, and others refused to leave for personal reasons.  But absolutly thousands of pounds of more sewage in the shelters would have been even worse than it was.  Thousands more would have died.  I notice you skirted my question entirley.  At what point would you have had the feds evacuate NO by force?(remeber it would have to occur before the storm hit)  The people who ignored/refused to leave, would you shoot them to make them leave? 

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 248
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/22/2007 1:55:34 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

oh?

do you remember where it was?  i missed it


It was the thread in which we briefly discussed the YouTube videos you have in your sig line.  The "Failure of World wide capitalism" thread, I believe.

FirmKY


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 249
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/22/2007 1:58:26 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

oh?

do you remember where it was?  i missed it


It was the thread in which we briefly discussed the YouTube videos you have in your sig line.  The "Failure of World wide capitalism" thread, I believe.

FirmKY



yah ok i remember now, i started out to find my supporting docs on it and got sidetracked... 


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 250
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/22/2007 2:09:21 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

yah ok i remember now, i started out to find my supporting docs on it and got sidetracked... 


It happens.  I wasn't looking to re-open it, unless it was pertinent to the thread at hand.

FirmKY


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 251
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/22/2007 4:59:36 PM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

Missturbation, I love you madly, but you are  allowing your emotions to lead you astray. If at the time  the US had got itself into position to launch a ground strike on Japan, your decision, and you saw estimates of the likely casulties to your own troops, and an alternative  ie Nuclear Weapons existed....what would you do ?

Incidently, to get close enough to Japan had cost enormous loss of life, fighting for the islands in the Pacific.


seeksfemmeslave:
Could you enumerate what you mean by "enormous loss of life fighting for the islands in the pacific.  The numbers I come up with are less than 50,000 which would be less than 5% of what the germans lost in the battle for Stalingrad. 
Since the Japanese had been trying to surrender since the battle of Midway the claims of a million casualities in taking the home islands of Japan seem more than a little disingenious.
In the end the Japanese got the terms that they started the negotians with ie: the preservation of the emperor.
thompson


In terms of casualties 50000 is an enormous number to my mind. 95% more is a double plus ungood ginormous number isn't it ?

Japanese suing for peace means what exactly, trying to extract themselves from a "difficult" situation. Was not the US policy, confirmed or at least not rejected or opposed in any significant numbers, by your legislators, one of unconditional Surrender.
Surely the Japs could have done that in 1943 . NO ?

< Message edited by seeksfemslave -- 1/22/2007 5:02:25 PM >

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 252
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/22/2007 5:17:48 PM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

They dont forget,(USA's missiles in Turkey) most probably didn't know. A big point is tho' that the existence of nuclear weapons seems to have maintained the peace , at least between the USA and USSR.

Along the same lines of "not knowing" I bet that most Americans dont know that Heny Cooper knocked out Cassius Clay as he then was. Only some very dirty tricks saved Clay's bacon. Relevence, well it all depends what the mass media emphasise in their reporting.


seeksfemmeslave:
Henry Cooper did not knock Cassius Clay out,  The only real punch he landed throughout the entire fight knocked Clay thruough the ropes and out of the ring onto the apron.  Clay acquired an extra 60 seconds on his stool while the referee found a replacement glove for one that had been damaged.  Clay then went on to beat Cooper mercilessly for the rest of the fight which the referee stopped about one minute before the end of the final round.
thompson


This is the kind of talk that really does endanger world peace. Clay was so bedazzled by the mighty left hook that knocked him virtually senseless that his eyes were spinning in both directions at the same time, reminding me of either Amos or Andy after Sapphire had hit him with her handbag !

The "damaged glove" was deliberately split by Angelo Dundee, we Brits knew that anyway, but Dundee is on record as admitting it.

Cooper was not beaten, he cut easily and his splattering blood was considered a  health risk to Cassius. and anyone sitting in the first three rows of ringside seats.

< Message edited by seeksfemslave -- 1/22/2007 5:19:30 PM >

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 253
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/22/2007 8:17:00 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
seeksfemmeslave:
Do you happen to remember what the round by round score was in that fight?  It was a long time ago but as I remember it, Cooper did not even win the round he managede to hit Clay in.  As for the dirty tricks I remember a line from an old fight movie...."the reason they don't hold these things in the sewer is because there is not enough head room."
I did not see the fight but I do remember listening to it on the radio and the radio anouncer was quite descriptive about the power in that punch and he seemed truely astonished to see Clay return to his old form after only 60 seconds of free rest he got from Dundee's skulduggery. 
thompson

(in reply to seeksfemslave)
Profile   Post #: 254
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/22/2007 8:43:43 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

luckydog1:
Because I can tell the difference between a rich mans cow and a poor mans life I am somehow using poor people as pawns?????????
If the govt. drops food to starving people  they will just shit it out and make a mess....is that what you really ment to say???
thompson


Bluntly, yes tompson...the plan decided on by the people of New Orleans before the storm was that everyone had to be evacuated, if the leeves failed.  That plan obviously failed, some were left behind, and others refused to leave for personal reasons.  But absolutly thousands of pounds of more sewage in the shelters would have been even worse than it was.  Thousands more would have died.  I notice you skirted my question entirley.  At what point would you have had the feds evacuate NO by force?(remeber it would have to occur before the storm hit)  The people who ignored/refused to leave, would you shoot them to make them leave? 


luckydog1:
In the first place "the plan decided on by the people of New Orleans" was not decided by the people of New Orleans but by the Authorities in the city.
Most of the people stranded in New Orleans (more than 51%) were stranded because they were too poor to leave.  The local authorities at the city,parish and state level made mistakes that costs many people their lives.  Evacuating New Orleans by force by the feds is your "false chooice" not mine.  My only point was that the government can use taxpayers money to feed rich mens cows and could not air drop food and water to those who were still in New Orleans.  I am not just talking about the ones in the sports arena but also the many who were on the roof tops and the parts of the city that were not under water. 
Your arguement that feeding them would just make them shit more...far better to let them starve, just boggels my mind.
As to the starving cows I would have thought the ranchers who owned them should be the ones responsible for feeding them not the taxpayers.  Why did the ranchers not rent helicopters and buy hay and hire crews to feed their own cows.  Why is the taxpayer saddled with the bill for the ranchers bad judgement...yes bad judgement ...it is always a judgement call when the rancher decides whether to bring his cows in to the feed lot for the winter or to let them tough it out with the elements on the range.
thompson

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 255
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/23/2007 1:10:05 AM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

seeksfemmeslave:
Do you happen to remember what the round by round score was in that fight?  It was a long time ago but as I remember it, Cooper did not even win the round he managede to hit Clay in.  As for the dirty tricks I remember a line from an old fight movie...."the reason they don't hold these things in the sewer is because there is not enough head room."
I did not see the fight but I do remember listening to it on the radio and the radio anouncer was quite descriptive about the power in that punch and he seemed truely astonished to see Clay return to his old form after only 60 seconds of free rest he got from Dundee's skulduggery. 
thompson


This is getting serious now !!, Clay/Ali was indulging himself in his usual fashion, you know, the Ali shuffle, rope a dope, waving to his opponent and the audience, going on sideways bicycle runs around even reciting poetry for all I know.  Meanwhile our Henery (sic) got the joke, smiled to himself  bided his time  then WHAM, off to sleep Ali, just 15 SECONDS too late thats all.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 256
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/23/2007 7:05:58 AM   
trannysub007


Posts: 105
Joined: 9/3/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: missturbation

Yes quite possibly but i still believe nuclear bombing of hiroshima was wrong and cowardly.


Too bad you weren't there to tell them that. Most Americans i know tend to agree with you, by the way.  

(in reply to missturbation)
Profile   Post #: 257
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/23/2007 7:28:25 AM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: trannysub007

quote:

ORIGINAL: missturbation

Yes quite possibly but i still believe nuclear bombing of hiroshima was wrong and cowardly.


Too bad you weren't there to tell them that. Most Americans i know tend to agree with you, by the way.  


I certainly do. I think it was completely evil, and only done as a display to the Soviets. 

(in reply to trannysub007)
Profile   Post #: 258
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/23/2007 7:40:07 AM   
missturbation


Posts: 8290
Joined: 2/12/2006
From: another planet
Status: offline
Loss of life is tragic no matter what the circumstances but mass murder of over 140,000 icluding th nagasaki bombing is just horrendous. It didnt end there either - there are still ill effects to this day.

_____________________________

What you don't witness with your eyes, don't witness with your mouth. Proverb.

If it fit's in a toaster, i can cook it.

Buying 10 item's or less is not shopping !!

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 259
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/23/2007 8:14:08 AM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
Yep ... and if you had the bomb, you would have dropped it on Berlin. We are so civilized ... we Westerners.

(in reply to missturbation)
Profile   Post #: 260
Page:   <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Threat to world peace??????? Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094