Amaros
Posts: 1363
Joined: 7/25/2005 Status: offline
|
Good point by Mary T., I mentioned the reason it is frowned upon in professional therapy, i.e., the patient is hghly vulnerable during transference - the whole idea is to develop trust so that the therapee can can communicate freely - and it is, in most cases, highly litigable and will most likely result in the therapists certification being revoked, there may even be criminal charges filed. People being what they are, it does happen, but seldom without consequences. "Mentoring", inthe BDSM sense, is not, as Mary T. described, a legal relationship in itself, and there is no accreditation involved. In the sense it is generally used, it does usually imply a non-sexual relationship - more along the lines of an advisor or coach. A more hands on approach is usually referred to as "training", and constitutes a more (or less) formal sexual relationship. It's certainly possible to combine the two, but I think such expectations should be negotiated beforehand, or if a non-sexual relationship threatens to turn into a sexual one, renegotiated - in the end, it really depends on the individuals involved, just as in any D/s relationship. At the same time, if for instance in an explicitly negotiated non-sexual mentoring arrangement, in a scenario involving bondage say, if the mentor loses it and make it a sexual relationship while the mentoree (!) is unable to give or withdraw consent, then you may well have issues if a safe word or equivilent has not been negotiated that could define the consent. Something to think about if you are playing with the dynamic and don't wish to negotiate it beforehand - or if the mentor is a third party and the student/acolyte has a largish boyfriend.
< Message edited by Amaros -- 1/18/2007 12:48:14 PM >
|