Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: the shi* is hitting the fan


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: the shi* is hitting the fan Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 6:23:06 PM   
MasDom


Posts: 375
Joined: 11/10/2005
Status: offline
My only concern is with who has the button.
Rite now their are more assholes in that nation preaching hate, then their ever were preaching life and love.

The problem with all that t,v influence and profit crap is that in the end they may elect a complete fagot of a president.
Some one just as dictating as Saddam and even worse as crazy as Kim Jung lee.

No offense Kim jung...

But were as I think at least poor Kim wouldn't nuke us for no stinking reason, I cant be so sure about some nut job that looks at Israel as prime real estate because it would support his power hungry control.
And worse off because rite now since their belief is if you die in the name of Allah then no worries.

I don't think their all like that, but Even thow i,d support 
border deterrence with nukes because in their past they had to deal with the Russians, British and christians...
I still don't want a nuke in the hands of some tyrannical bastard with to much bullshit in his mind from all this, able to push a button and feel graced for it.


I,m sitting hear listening to tornado and air raid sirens going off on the t,v and it gives me that cold war feeling.
Only this time were all a little less domineered from all these years of bull and abuse.

< Message edited by MasDom -- 1/20/2007 6:26:06 PM >

(in reply to Missterri26L)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 6:23:38 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
Meatcleaver is right actually.  As usual NG does not know what he is talking about.

France originally called for the attack to take place to wear down the German offensive.  It was intended to be a joint British-French invasion.  However, France then demanded that it be moved ahead so that they could route German resources away from Verdun.  Britain took over the planning and execution of the attack, and the offensive turned out to be a primarily British manouver.

It was never intended to break through the enemy lines and gain ground as a primary objective, merely a secondary one.  However, it was British troops under the command of Allenby that made the offensive and broke through enemy lines.

Everything NG has said is complete bunk.

For all the details I found a link:

http://www.firstworldwar.com/battles/somme.htm

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 6:24:14 PM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
So your WWI ended in 1916. Sorry, I thought the war went on until 1918. It is possibly me that is mistaken.

I thought the introduction of tanks and other innovative tactics was a figment of my imagination and they obviously were.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 6:36:28 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin

Meatcleaver is right actually.  As usual NG does not know what he is talking about.

France originally called for the attack to take place to wear down the German offensive.  It was intended to be a joint British-French invasion.  However, France then demanded that it be moved ahead so that they could route German resources away from Verdun.  Britain took over the planning and execution of the attack, and the offensive turned out to be a primarily British manouver.

It was never intended to break through the enemy lines and gain ground as a primary objective, merely a secondary one.  However, it was British troops under the command of Allenby that made the offensive and broke through enemy lines.

Everything NG has said is complete bunk.

For all the details I found a link:

http://www.firstworldwar.com/battles/somme.htm


What a fucking plank you are. Yes, Verdun was the mince-grinder that ground down 330,00 French troops. Yes, the British were supposed to relieve Verdun by attacking at the Somme.

But, the British and Canadians didn't break through. The only force who broke through were the French in their sector of the Somme. Keep googling it until you find it because I don't own you and I'm not responsible for educating you.

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 6:38:13 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

So your WWI ended in 1916. Sorry, I thought the war went on until 1918. It is possibly me that is mistaken.

I thought the introduction of tanks and other innovative tactics was a figment of my imagination and they obviously were.


WTF, have a look at the flow of the conversation and see who said what. You are rapidly losing my respect.

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 6:40:11 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin

Meatcleaver is right actually.  As usual NG does not know what he is talking about.

France originally called for the attack to take place to wear down the German offensive.  It was intended to be a joint British-French invasion.  However, France then demanded that it be moved ahead so that they could route German resources away from Verdun.  Britain took over the planning and execution of the attack, and the offensive turned out to be a primarily British manouver.

It was never intended to break through the enemy lines and gain ground as a primary objective, merely a secondary one.  However, it was British troops under the command of Allenby that made the offensive and broke through enemy lines.

Everything NG has said is complete bunk.

For all the details I found a link:

http://www.firstworldwar.com/battles/somme.htm


What a fucking plank you are. Yes, Verdun was the mince-grinder that ground down 330,00 French troops. Yes, the British were supposed to relieve Verdun by attacking at the Somme.

But, the British and Canadians didn't break through. The only force who broke through were the French in their sector of the Somme. Keep googling it until you find it because I don't own you and I'm not responsible for educating you.


Instead of losing your cool and calling me names, read the damn link.  It is not about Verdun, it is about the Battle of the Somme.  And in the Battle of the Somme, it was the British that broke through.  Not the French.

I do not need your kind of education, because I prefer to know what I am talking about.  But thank you all the same.

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 6:44:22 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
You mentioned Verdun in your original post.

The French made gains at the Somme, not the British.

Now, I'm not going to google anything for your benefit as I honestly think you are a waste of oxygen. However, if you promise not to post on this board ever again if I'm right and you're wrong then I will consider it a worthwhile venture and I will google it - deal?

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 6:52:09 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
Ok.  You obviously do not know jack shit about anything and did not even read that article...  So here are some quotes so everyone else knows you have no idea what the hell you are rambling on about.

quote:

More success was achieved by the French forces at the southern tail of the line, possibly because their advance bombardment was sprung only hours before the attack, thus ensuring a degree of surprise.  In addition, von Falkenhayn believed that the French would not attack at all on account of their heavy losses at Verdun.  By advancing in small groups, as they had at Verdun, the French troops achieved most of their objectives.  Even so, the gains made here were consolidated upon rather than exploited.

 
quote:

Despite heavy losses during the first day – 58,000 British troops alone – Haig persisted with the offensive in the following days.  Advances were made, but these were limited and often ultimately repulsed.  Rawlinson’s forces secured the first line of German trenches on 11 July.  On that day German troops were transferred from Verdun to contribute to the German defence, doubling the number of men available for the defence.

 
Who is Haig?  A British Commander-in-Chief of the BEF.  Who is Rawlinson?  The General of the British Fourth army.
 
Now go back to being converted or whatever the hell you were doing and leave the discussion here to people who actually bother to take the time to know what they are talking about.  Your stupid names and personal attacks are not going to hide your ignorance of the facts.

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 6:56:25 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
Here is another quote, yet again showing everyone that you have zero clue...  It tells us about the origination of the Battle of the Somme and who orchestrated it. 

quote:


The offensive was planned late in 1915 and was intended as a joint French-British attack.  The French Commander in Chief, Joffre, conceived the idea as a battle of attrition, the aim being to drain the German forces of reserves, although territorial gain was a secondary aim.
The plan was agreed upon by the new British Commander in Chief, Sir Douglas Haig, although Haig would have preferred an offensive among the open ground of Flanders.  Haig, who took up his appointment as Commander in Chief of the BEF on 19 December 1915, had been granted authorisation by the British government, led by Asquith, to conduct a major offensive in 1916.
Although in actuality British forces comprised by far the bulk of the offensive forces, Joffre and Haig originally intended for the attack to be a predominantly French offensive.  However the German onslaught at Verdun at the start of 1916, where the German Army Chief of Staff, von Falkenhayn promised to ‘bleed France white’, resulted in the diversion of virtually all French manpower and efforts.
The German Verdun offensive transformed the intent of the Somme attack; the French demanded that the planned date of the attack, 1 August 1916, be brought forward to 1 July, the aim chiefly being to divert German resources from Verdun in the defence of the Somme.
Haig took over responsibility from Joffre for the planning and execution of the attack.  Haig meticulous preparations progressed slowly, much to Joffre’s irritation.  Haig intended to fashion the attack using the ideas of both himself and General Rawlinson, whose Fourth army was to spearhead the assault.


_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 7:00:45 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
Are you serious? The only army who had success according to your own link were the French! Have another read.

Also, have a read of this British television station:

http://www.channel4.com/history/microsites/F/firstworldwar/cont_breaking_2.html

Note this comment:

The difference between the two approaches is evident in the contrasting casualty rates on the first day of the infantry assault (1 July). On that day, French troops captured all their objectives while sustaining only light casualties, whereas the British gained very little territory and lost 58,000 men - the highest losses sustained by any army in a single day during the entire war
 
 
kenin, you're a two-bob blaggard. Not a clue.
 

< Message edited by NorthernGent -- 1/20/2007 7:06:50 PM >


_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 7:05:06 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
kenin, I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that you want me to correct you. There is no mention of British success in your links. Read my links and you'll see there is mention of French advances.

I've just had another read and I'm thinking you're not a full shilling. Even your own link talks of French success but not British success.

< Message edited by NorthernGent -- 1/20/2007 7:06:14 PM >


_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 7:07:37 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
Ok.  Now I think you are mentally deficient.  The French did not secure their objective.

But what do you call this?

quote:

Rawlinson’s forces secured the first line of German trenches on 11 July.

 
Idiot.

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 7:20:13 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
kenin, jesus christ:

More success was achieved by the French forces at the southern tail of the line
 
The British troops were for the most part forced back into their trenches by the effectiveness of the German machine gun response
 
The above is from your own link.
 
From my link:
 
The difference between the two approaches is evident in the contrasting casualty rates on the first day of the infantry assault (1 July). On that day, French troops captured all their objectives while sustaining only light casualties, whereas the British gained very little territory and lost 58,000 men - the highest losses sustained by any army in a single day during the entire war.
 
 
 


 



_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 7:25:18 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
However, Britain's failure on the Somme can be directly attributed to the ineffectiveness of this bombardment. Many - up to 30% - of the shells fired during the first week of the offensive were duds that failed to explode. In addition, the British had insufficient numbers of the heavy guns and high-explosive shells needed to destroy the German positions.

In contrast, the French possessed a greater number of powerful artillery pieces and directed a shorter and more intense barrage across a narrower front, a tactic that more effectively neutralised the German positions.


From the British TV link above


< Message edited by NorthernGent -- 1/20/2007 7:26:47 PM >


_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 7:30:21 PM   
gooddogbenji


Posts: 5094
Joined: 11/15/2005
From: Toronto
Status: offline
This conversation reminds me of one I had with a friend.  I had all the evidence to prove that girls have cooties, and he had all the evidence to prove they did not.  We ended up throwing frogs at each other and telling our parents, who grounded the other guy.

Grade 2 was so much fun!

Yours,


benji

_____________________________

Prevent global warming. Stop burning patchouli.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 7:31:20 PM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

However, Britain's failure on the Somme can be directly attributed to the ineffectiveness of this bombardment. Many - up to 30% - of the shells fired during the first week of the offensive were duds that failed to explode. In addition, the British had insufficient numbers of the heavy guns and high-explosive shells needed to destroy the German positions.

In contrast, the French possessed a greater number of powerful artillery pieces and directed a shorter and more intense barrage across a narrower front, a tactic that more effectively neutralised the German positions.


From the British TV link above



I was totally in to tank warfare as a child (unlike our President, I outgrew it) and studied the development of the tank.  It sticks in my mind that tanks in world war 1 were generally unreliable, and did not move fast enough to escape being a huge artillery target.  They did cause fear in the hearts of the enemy, but to say that they were a decisive increase in military technology, I do not recall that being the case.

Although my favorite was after countries began developing faster and faster planes, when the US went to war in Vietnam they discovered their aircraft were too fast to be effective.

The A-10 Warthog is my favorite warplane of all time.

Just me, probably wrong, etc.

Sinergy

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 7:33:19 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Grade 2 was so much fun!


Oh, but those poor frogs . . .

(in reply to gooddogbenji)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 7:35:08 PM   
Domisub


Posts: 3
Joined: 1/9/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MsSpankhardSk

(in reply to MsSpankhardSk)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 7:39:09 PM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasDom

Some one just as dictating as Saddam and even worse as crazy as Kim Jung lee.

No offense Kim jung...

But were as I think at least poor Kim wouldn't nuke us for no stinking reason, I cant be so sure about some nut job that looks at Israel as prime real estate because it would support his power hungry control.



While it is nice that North Korea has developed the ability to build a nuclear bomb, probably from plans they got off the internet, I have yet to hear Kim Jong Il actually threaten anybody except South Korea.  I wonder how much of the idea that he is a nut job is a fabrication of Faux News and Monkeyboy's Nightmare Team.

Sinergy

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to MasDom)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: the shi* is hitting the fan - 1/20/2007 7:40:48 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

kenin, jesus christ:

More success was achieved by the French forces at the southern tail of the line
 
The British troops were for the most part forced back into their trenches by the effectiveness of the German machine gun response
 
The above is from your own link.
 
From my link:
 
The difference between the two approaches is evident in the contrasting casualty rates on the first day of the infantry assault (1 July). On that day, French troops captured all their objectives while sustaining only light casualties, whereas the British gained very little territory and lost 58,000 men - the highest losses sustained by any army in a single day during the entire war.
 
 


Here is what pisses me off about you the most, and I have seen it in more threads than I care to.  You are ALWAYS inevitably wrong, yet you argue until you are blue in the face, twisting and contorting the facts to suit your liking.  If you just bloody admitted you were wrong and dropped it, I would have respect for you.  As of now, I have more respect for dandruff.

The "More success" that you are highlighting has been taken completely out of context by you.  If you would put the whole thing together, you would realize that the article is stating that there was more success THAN...  a HUGE THAN, their comrades further up the front.  Note that NOWHERE does it say that they were successful in taking enemy positions and the FIRST division successful at doing so was the British Fourth army, the quote of which I provided

It is very clear in the context of the article that the British, as mentioned in my quote, made the decisive first conquest.

Now, either shut the fuck up, or just admit that you were wrong and we can chat about something else because I am sick of listening to you twist everything to hide the fact that you do not know what you are talking about.

If you can, provide us with a link that clearly indicates that the French were at the advantage...  Considering it was a chiefly British effort and all I would be very interested to see that to say the least.

< Message edited by SirKenin -- 1/20/2007 7:46:18 PM >


_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: the shi* is hitting the fan Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094