FirmhandKY
Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004 Status: offline
|
While I'll agree with the sentiment that Paula Zahn isn't much of a "journalist", I'd dispute that it had anything to do with a "right-wing media". Here is another take on Zahn's handling of the Nifong/Durham "rape case": Paula Zahn Cracks the Case Extracts: None of the panelists appeared aware that the case emerged several weeks before a hotly contested primary in which Nifong needed black votes. Zahn gave no evidence that she understood this issue either. In a case where we’ve seen copious irresponsible media speculation, Zahn’s Friday program stood out. The CNN personality gave a forum to guests who clearly knew next to nothing about the case, and then allowed them to make misstatements of fact and outrageous comparisons while ignoring the unprecedented event of a DA’s forced recusal because of ethics allegations. ... Zahn’s most troubling performance came on April 17, when she blandly dismissed Joe Cheshire’s assertion that no assault occurred. Dripping with incredulity, the host wondered how Cheshire could “explain the woman’s injuries, particularly some of the internal injuries.” Zahn neither then nor thereafter clarified to which “internal injuries” she was referring. “I want to know,” she lectured Cheshire, “why you think this woman, who you claim to know an awful lot about, would have made up this story . . . and turned her life upside down.” In fact, as we know now, the accuser “made up this story” as she was on the verge of being involuntarily committed. ... This is the person who’s going to moderate a forum on race in Durham? Tuesday night, perhaps Duke students should make clear to Zahn that they expect higher journalistic standards when their classmates’ lives are at stake. Again, I'm not sure where the "right wing media" fit in with this. Journalistic mal-practice seems to be more like it. FirmKY
_____________________________
Some people are just idiots.
|