cyberdude611 -> RE: Run, Al, Run? (2/27/2007 2:43:37 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sinergy What amuses me, dcnovice, is how virulently the nitwits (who live in Dumbfuckistan) that elected Monkeyboy to be emperor object to the idea that Hillary Clinton could be elected. It is almost like they honestly believe that she could do a worse job than the Simian In Chief and his rabble have done. Boggles the imagination. Sinergy She's changes her stances way too often. You compare what she said just a few years ago on certain issues to what she is saying now and it is the complete opposite. It is quite obvious she is moving her stance based on what the voters want to here. This was a losing strategy for John Kerry as the GOP totally ripped him apart what was called, "flip-flopping." There is also a lot of dislike for Hillary in the national popularity polls. Something like 46% have an unfavorable opinion of her. She's got the socialist label taped on her back and she needs to figure out how to get it off without making the left-wing angry. There is also rising tentions building between her campaign and Obama's. And if this escalates, it may just make voters dislike the two so much that someone like John Edwards could end up ahead by the time the primaries roll around. Keep in mind also that the Democrats have changed their primaries slightly, so this could be an impact. On the GOP side, no one seems to be jumping out ahead. Giuliani and McCain are neck and neck. And Romney is pretty far behind. But in my opinion, none of those 3 will get the nomination. It is more likely to be either Gingrich or one of the dark horses. Democrats may not want to run on the idea of stopping the Iraq war. Since it seems there is not even any consensus in the Democratic party to even limit the war. In fact, a few Senators said they will defect to the GOP if the Dems vote to limit funds. So it looks like the left-wing was the biggest loser of 2006 and will be again in 2008.
|
|
|
|