subgreg
Posts: 50
Joined: 11/29/2004 Status: offline
|
The other day, Ma'am and I were having a conversation that got me thinking about the nature of D/s relationships. She had asked me what made me her submissive. To be honest, I did not know what to say. Don't get me wrong, I most definitely know my feelings for her, I had just never thought about it in those terms. I love Ma'am, repect her, find her incredibly sexy, and feel she has a great mind and is a very strong person. I care for her and want to makeher life as pleasing and enjoyable and safe as possible. But none of these feelings are considered exclusivly submissive. We have a D/s relationship which is a power exchange relationship in which Ma'am is the ultimate authority. I have my own opinions and am encouraged to contribute my thoughts and feelings on all topics, but the ultimate decision making lies with Ma'am, should she choose to exercise it. Now this may not seem very Lifestyle to you. You may think it sounds more like a traditional marriage, only with the roles reversed. And I would agree with you. I feel that all relationships are D/s relationships to varying degrees. Those in the Lifestyle are merely those that are conscious of it. Many people also see D/s and BDSM as the same thing, or D/s as being part of BDSM. This I would disagree with. The two share practicioners, but are not mutually inclusive. You could be in a D/s realationship without ever having picked up a paddle, and you can play every weekend without being in a D/s relationship. Now this got me thinking about what qualifies a person as a submissive. When i first started in the scene, I thought that all those that played, whether it be bent over a horse, or serving in a domestic capacity were submissives. After a little while, I came to understand that there were also such a thing as bottoms. From what I understood, bottoms were those that participated in scenes, or served, because they enjoyed it, not for the pleasure of the top. I thought that this was a shallow way to be, and considered myself a true submissive because I wanted to please the person I was with. This all changed when my relationship with Ma'am began. Prior to her, I felt that anytime I scened with someone or served them I was submitting to them. Now with Ma'am, I truly know what it means to submit. I am completely hers and we share a strong bond of love. The bond does not need to be of love per say, but I feel that to truly submit to someone you have to completely give yourself over to them, not just for an hour, but 24/7, for the rest of your life. This does not mean you are in their presence 24/7, just that you are their's in mind 24/7. So in hindsight, while I felt I was A submissive, I was just being submissive. I was a bottom. This has changed my feelings on bottoms. While I still feel there are those that are selfish, interested only in their own pleasure, I no longer paint all bottoms with the same broad strokes. I realize that being a bottom is not an inferior thing, it it just being submissive without that critical bond. Someare looking for it, and some are not.
_____________________________
Beach's toyboy "The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation" ~~~ http://www.myspace.com/beachs_toyboy http://bodyspace.bodybuilding.com/beachstoyboy/ http://talkingsex.ning.com/profile/Beachstoyboy
|