dcnovice
Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006 Status: offline
|
Took another look at the MSNBC piece, and I honestly think AP's writers and editors made the right call. Several reasons: (a) The focus of the story is not the killer, but the survivors' response to the tragedy. The killer's religion, which might be germane to a profile of him, doesn't seem particularly pertinent here. (b) Investigators do not know what role, if any, the killer's religion played in his actions. Making his religion a key identifier, therefore, would be misleading. (c) Making a big deal of the killer's being a Muslim would all too likely result in readers' viewing him as representative of the entire religion in a way that would not happen if he were, say, Lutheran (as one of the Columbine shooters was). That doesn't mean the fact should never be mentioned, imho, but that editors should be particularly sure that it is truly germane to the story.
_____________________________
No matter how cynical you become, it's never enough to keep up. JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE
|