Topping without dominance... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


TallDarkAndWitty -> Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 8:07:15 AM)

(For the sake of clarity, I am using the following definitions of Top: a generic term for the set of roles that includes all top halves of a BDSM relationship (dom/master/owner/authority/daddy/big/trainer/sadist/etc).)

I consider myself a Top. I think I am a pretty good Top. People enjoy my scenes, both as participants and as observers. I am in a rather rewarding Master/slave relationship. I can speak with some knowledge on lots of topics. I write rather detailed and effective contracts. I can describe and train positions, rituals and postures with the best of them. But even with this impressive list of achievements, I have come to realize that I am not a very good dominant.

I think it comes down to desire. I really have no urge to dominate anyone else. I love to be served. I love to own. I enjoy tying a lovely little thing up and doing all sorts of wonderfully sensual things to it. But when it comes down to the whole dominance/submission thing...I am just not into it at all.

If you want to serve me, great...but don't expect me to give you menacing glares and use a commanding tone of voice. Don't expect to tremble in fear at my wrath. Don't expect to have me put you in your place for sassing me. It just isn't my thing...

I really think I have come to realize that the only person I want to dominate and control is myself, all others should serve me because that is what they need and desire.

Thoughts?

Taggard




domtimothy46176 -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 8:18:08 AM)

Interesting picture you paint. One question comes to mind: Outside the confines of a scene, with one who wants to serve you because that is what she needs and desires, do you expect her to serve you as you wish to be served or is she free to serve you as best she can ascertain you need to be served?




TallDarkAndWitty -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 8:25:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: domtimothy46176
Outside the confines of a scene, with one who wants to serve you because that is what she needs and desires, do you expect her to serve you as you wish to be served or is she free to serve you as best she can ascertain you need to be served?


Great question, and one that cuts to the heart of what I am talking about. I expect him/her to serve me in the way we have negotiated and detailed in his/her contract. In reality, I expect the slave/property to submit to the contract, and not to me at all.

I have no desire to be the recipient of the slave's submission...just their service.

Rather fascinating, these things you discover about yourself...

Taggard




stormsfate -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 8:30:02 AM)

:::laughing::: I knew there was a reason you and my owner got along so well at the picnic last year, Taggard. And all this time I thought it was the black and white movies. He is similar to you in the sense that he doesn't feel he needs to wave a big stick in order to flex his authority...its simply there.

If he had to constantly give menacing glares or threaten to obtain my service, I think he would quickly tire of me and move on to someone with more of a willingness to please him. Its a difficult thing to explain...he just *is* dominant, but feels no need to puff out his chest and make sure everyone around him is aware of his manliness and domination.

That being said, I can't say I don't tremble in fear at his wrath sometimes, and its not to say that he doesn't have that tone of voice...more than its not a suit of clothes he puts on in order to fit into the role of Lord Dominant Master Supreme Being On High. Its just who he is.

Did any of this post make sense? <laughing>

best regards,
fate




domtimothy46176 -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 8:58:08 AM)

Yeah, I agree with you as defining it as a service-top although I still call it service-dominant away from an actual scene. Just a question of semantics for me, as I specify scening as topping and non-scening as dominating, even if there is no overt domination, as you've described. To me, there are no requirements more overt than recognition of the parameters of the negotiated arrangement and the roles of the particpants. In fact, despite whatever additional elements come into play between my girl and myself, our basic foundation is just as you've described. Her first commandment, after protecting her health and safety, is to honor our agreement. Everything else is either a sub-category or a side-bar arrangement.
Timothy




Gemeni -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 9:06:21 AM)

I've come to only want to Dominate Myself as well.

Enslaving another also does the same thing to you. The cycles of need and dependency Ds all too often fosters seems a bit on the sick side to me. Probably due to the fact that my paternal instincts are basically zilch.

I have no desire to be anyone's daddy after the fact.




EmeraldSlave2 -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 9:50:56 AM)

I'm a baby top and I love it. I also enjoy authority SOMEWHAT outside of scenes, but find the responsibility somewhat daunting at this point. The Owner feels that eventually I will grow into a full blown switch as a slave and dominant. Who knows.





MidnightWriter -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 10:01:35 AM)

Taggard - wouldn't that make you a "ballroom top", rather than a "ballroom dom"? [;)]

quote:

ORIGINAL: TallDarkAndWitty

I think it comes down to desire. I really have no urge to dominate anyone else. I love to be served. I love to own. I enjoy tying a lovely little thing up and doing all sorts of wonderfully sensual things to it. But when it comes down to the whole dominance/submission thing...I am just not into it at all.

Perhaps our understanding of what d/s is differs.

quote:

If you want to serve me, great...but don't expect me to give you menacing glares and use a commanding tone of voice. Don't expect to tremble in fear at my wrath. Don't expect to have me put you in your place for sassing me. It just isn't my thing...

Menacing glares? Fear of my wrath? Taggard - you've been watching the wrong movies.

I don't do painplay as punishment - mostly, I do it as reward. (OK - I've done a few punishment scenes that included pain, but at a total of less than 1 per sub per year, it's not really what anyone would call a habit.) My most vicious punishment to date has been (and will doubtless continue to be) "bad sub, no scene - go to bed".

The menacing glare is pretty much reserved for youngsters who are misbehaving in public, or for playing "let's make funny faces" with the wee ones.

The look that my slaves never wanted to see is interpreted by most others as "ohhh - how interesting". Raise the eyebrows, small smile, looks like I'm taking a mental note - largely, because I'm planning an upcoming training session with someone who has just failed to meet my expectations. No cause for anger, just gotta work on correcting that behavior.

quote:

I really think I have come to realize that the only person I want to dominate and control is myself, all others should serve me because that is what they need and desire.

While it's a truism that one cannot dominate another without first controlling oneself, there's more to it for me than "you may serve me if you wish to".

There is an actual energy exchange. Not as in "I worked off 120 calories doing that flogging, they'll scurry off and fetch me some coffee", but on a quasi-mystical level - what the Chinese call chi.

(Everything below this is my experience/perception/style - those who do it differently are hereby acknowledged. Full disclaimers are in force, okay? Flames you really MUST send are more welcome in my mailbox than here.)

Domination is not me glowering at someone, riding crop brandished menacingly, while I growl orders. Domination is me controlling their actions by simple force of will. This necessitates training and a fair bit of intimacy - energy flows best where it's flowed before. I could, I suppose, bark orders into someone's face - but I'd much rather make a quiet comment that had the same effect on the sub.

It's remarkably difficult to explain in text, and modern medical science is barely beginning to understand the ways in which energy flows from one person to another - but it's there, and real, and that's where domination takes place for me.

Decades ago, I saw a master who was not out at all - and I'd never even considered d/s an option for real people, and only fantasized about bondage, because nobody did that for anything but porn, either. He was my regional manager in a direct-sales organization - meaning, I ran a crew that sold encyclopedias door-to-door, and he was my boss/trainer. He taught me about sales - and what I learned is part of the reason I avoid television - you can do lots of nifty things to people without them ever noticing it, and the fun kids down at Madison Ave. know most of the tricks.

As an example of what could be done, he had me pick, at random, one of the women who were waiting for a job-placement interview, which we were holding at a Holiday Inn. During our poolside interview, he quietly told her to take her shirt off. She was surprised, and asked him if she'd heard correctly. He repeated the command, again quietly. She looked around the pool area, blushed, and told him that she really couldn't do such a thing. He smiled pleasantly, assured her that she'd be hired whether or not she complied, and repeated himself: "Take that shirt off, now. While you're at it, take the bra off as well."

Her bra and my jaw hit the floor at about the same time. No coercion, no promises, no threats - just a simple expression of what he wanted her to do. Quiet, reasonable, and totally determined. I expected her to get up and walk away, but he expected her to strip to the waist - and she did.

I learned a lot from that old con artist, and in retrospect, his beautiful wife's behavior makes perfect sense when I view them as a heavy d/s relationship. My early practical, non-business uses of this skill were regrettable - I went a tad power-drunk. Ashamed of what I'd made people do, I quit doing it at all - until over a decade had passed, and I tripped across a submissive and found a new use for that skill.

It would take one helluvan actor to make that translate to film, which has always struck me as why bdsm porn doesn't ever show this - and, conversely, why I'm not much into bdsm porn.

Taggard - you're a ballroom dancer. With a good partner, you've occasionally led someone through a move that they'd not done before, that you'd not discussed - you just led it, and they followed. It's not growling, it's not explaining, it's simply wanting them to do it, and they do. Sure, there's frame and cues and you're a good lead and all of that - but it has, at its core, an element of d/s - you lead, they follow, no problem.

That's where it lives for me, anyway.




TallDarkAndWitty -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 11:28:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MidnightWriter

Taggard - wouldn't that make you a "ballroom top", rather than a "ballroom dom"? [;)]


Why...I think it does!!! If any Mods happen to see this, could you possibly change my descriptor to "Ballroom Top"???

I even like the spinning connotation that goes with that...


quote:


Perhaps our understanding of what d/s is differs.


I don't think so...in whole and in part, I really agree with what you have written.

I think I am just balking at the term "dominance." I don't want to dominate my property. I want to enjoy it, use it, find peace and joy with it. Domination seems like such an aggressive word, and I find it just doesn't fit what I see as my style.


quote:


Menacing glares? Fear of my wrath? Taggard - you've been watching the wrong movies.


Or just the wrong scenes...

Those couples are out there...and many of them are happy. I think there are also a number of submissives who are looking for that kind of "will put up with no bullsh!t" master who does indeed rule with an iron fist. I just have no desire to be one of those masters.

quote:

While it's a truism that one cannot dominate another without first controlling oneself, there's more to it for me than "you may serve me if you wish to".


Does there need to be?


quote:


There is an actual energy exchange. Not as in "I worked off 120 calories doing that flogging, they'll scurry off and fetch me some coffee", but on a quasi-mystical level - what the Chinese call chi.


I completely agree...yet the energy flow is quite different from one pair to the next.


quote:


Domination is not me glowering at someone, riding crop brandished menacingly, while I growl orders. Domination is me controlling their actions by simple force of will. This necessitates training and a fair bit of intimacy - energy flows best where it's flowed before. I could, I suppose, bark orders into someone's face - but I'd much rather make a quiet comment that had the same effect on the sub.


Is that really "domination" then? It sounds more like command. Domination implies an aggressiveness that, I think, often is an apt way to describe some styles. The style you describe, however, does not seem to be one of domination.

quote:


Taggard - you're a ballroom dancer. With a good partner, you've occasionally led someone through a move that they'd not done before, that you'd not discussed - you just led it, and they followed. It's not growling, it's not explaining, it's simply wanting them to do it, and they do. Sure, there's frame and cues and you're a good lead and all of that - but it has, at its core, an element of d/s - you lead, they follow, no problem.


I think that is a wonderful way to describe my Topping style. I lead...my slave follows.

I really do need to put together a BDSM and Ballroom dance demo for Black Rose and such...

Taggard




Alexander -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 11:32:13 AM)

Ive been searching for my copies of the lemon heads "style" with rick james to add here before I might add to this discussion. No such luck.




MidnightWriter -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 12:39:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TallDarkAndWitty

quote:

ORIGINAL: MidnightWriter

Taggard - wouldn't that make you a "ballroom top", rather than a "ballroom dom"? [;)]


Why...I think it does!!! If any Mods happen to see this, could you possibly change my descriptor to "Ballroom Top"???

I even like the spinning connotation that goes with that...

Some kinky graphic artist could have lots of fun with an animated avatar for that...


quote:

I think I am just balking at the term "dominance." I don't want to dominate my property. I want to enjoy it, use it, find peace and joy with it. Domination seems like such an aggressive word, and I find it just doesn't fit what I see as my style.

The word does have a negative emotional index - particularly in today's society. Getting beyond that can be tough.

quote:

quote:


Menacing glares? Fear of my wrath? Taggard - you've been watching the wrong movies.


Or just the wrong scenes...

Those couples are out there...and many of them are happy. I think there are also a number of submissives who are looking for that kind of "will put up with no bullsh!t" master who does indeed rule with an iron fist. I just have no desire to be one of those masters.

Yup - some seem to thrive on that whole "barking orders like a drill sergeant" thing - and to tell the truth, they are kind of fun to watch, but I've never wanted that style for myself, either.

OTOH, I've got something of an iron fist, and feel no need to put up with bullshit - and do enjoy things more when they're doing my will, rather than thier own.

I'm probably a twisted pervert or something - but I'd far rather get a blowjob (for example) from someone who wasn't really in the mood to give a blowjob, but was doing their best because I wanted them to, than get one from someone who really really wanted to give one.

I suppose I could claim laziness. After all, it's much easier to nod in the direction of my coffee cup than to growl "Hey, you - my coffee needs refilling, and it's going to be refilled NOW!". However, it's a lot of work to get to the place where the nod is as effective - so maybe it's not laziness after all.

Damn. I like being lazy.

quote:

quote:

While it's a truism that one cannot dominate another without first controlling oneself, there's more to it for me than "you may serve me if you wish to".


Does there need to be?

There does for me. You, of course, aren't me - which is a good thing. You probably wouldn't like the weather in Minnesnowta, and two of me would be one too many.

quote:

quote:


There is an actual energy exchange. Not as in "I worked off 120 calories doing that flogging, they'll scurry off and fetch me some coffee", but on a quasi-mystical level - what the Chinese call chi.


I completely agree...yet the energy flow is quite different from one pair to the next.

Different flavors for different people, but the flow itself remains the same in my experience. Then again, I've only owned two - there are probably surprises in store for me yet.

quote:

quote:


Domination is not me glowering at someone, riding crop brandished menacingly, while I growl orders. Domination is me controlling their actions by simple force of will. This necessitates training and a fair bit of intimacy - energy flows best where it's flowed before. I could, I suppose, bark orders into someone's face - but I'd much rather make a quiet comment that had the same effect on the sub.


Is that really "domination" then? It sounds more like command. Domination implies an aggressiveness that, I think, often is an apt way to describe some styles. The style you describe, however, does not seem to be one of domination.

Oh, if it's not domination, it'll do until I find out what "real" domination is. Personally, I'm not ready to go to BDSMCO - (adding command / obedience) - so, in my lexicon, it'll remain a style of domination.

If you prefer a different word, of course, that's your call - but some folks will find it very easy to misunderstand you unless you do a LOT of communicating about what exactly you mean by "top". There's a certain utility to common usage.

quote:

I really do need to put together a BDSM and Ballroom dance demo for Black Rose and such...


If you singletail, a tango could be ... impressive.




celestia -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 1:23:27 PM)

Just my own personal thoughts in a nutshell...


" I have come to realize that I am not a very good dominant. "

This of course is by your own definition.


"If you want to serve me, great...but don't expect me to give you menacing glares and use a commanding tone of voice. Don't expect to tremble in fear at my wrath. Don't expect to have me put you in your place for sassing me. It just isn't my thing... "

Wow where do I start with this? First if I want to serve someone it is not going to be based on fear, It's going to be based on my own need to be submissive. I am not submissve becasue I am afraid somone is going to take a whip to me if I am not, and I certainly do not expect to be glared at or yelled at. As a sub/slave/bottom what have you ( god I am beginning to hate titles), I expect myself to be well mannered and do as has been set forth so as not to receive those kind of traits, be it by a contract or direct from the Master's mouth. I take more kindly to a soft whisper, that holds the knowledge of what that persons desires are, than a harsh command that says, "you'll do it or suffer". So if it is not your "thing" to behave in that manner so be it. I however do not think this disqualifies you from being/having dominance. And if a sub is going to sas you, is she truly feeling her submission at all. IMO, she is looking to get punished.



"I think it comes down to desire. I really have no urge to dominate anyone else."

When you have a "lovely little thing" tyed up or under contract are you using your will/desire/need to gain something from her? Is she not using her submissvness to feed that? In essence is this not dominating? You set forth your expectations in your contracts, these contracts are just paper, you can not serve paper, I'm submitting to the person that wrote the words on the paper. Who chooses to declare his expectaions in written text instead of verbal commands. Does this disqualify you as a dominat? Not in my book.


"I really think I have come to realize that the only person I want to dominate and control is myself, all others should serve me because that is what they need and desire."

In order to be a dominate I agree with what others have said, you have to control yourself first before you can excert this over others. In the same token those of us that are submissives should serve out of that need, not because someone has dragged us kicking and screaming, demanding that we bow down. This is neither safe nor sane, and hardly consensual.



"I have no desire to be the recipient of the slave's submission...just their service. "

Unfortuantely, Taggard, you are the recipient. You accept that when you sign the contract, or when you place the collar upon their throats. If you only wish service then they have maids for that and their servie won't be to you but to your money. Forgive me if that sounded harsh.




Alexander -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 2:01:10 PM)

Ok, Celestia has described what I planned on saying here to some extent and in her own way. I will be brief.

A very clever slave girl said something to me that for whatever reason, context , the time of day, what I ate, opened my eyes.

Master makes a girl.

Oh sure we could just look at it and say, well duh, master makes a girl he makes her do things he makes her say things he makes her serve. But thats not what it means. It means something profoundly different.

You may not want to think you are a good dominant today for whatever reason, but unfortunately for you, you do not get to decide. That girl who looks up at you, she knows. Not all girls by decree, not because you do some specific thing or because you act a specific way. Who you are makes her what she is. You either allow her to be herself fully and she feels it in your presense or you don't. These things aren't universal, these things aren't determined by style and technique they are determined by subconcious connections between human beings that can never, thank all that is devine, be expressed in words.

I feel like I want to reassure you because your a friend of mine but heres the only advice I have. Fuck all that. Live in you're moment. You have one of those extraordinary minds that assaults a problem and charges it head on and I don't think theres been many things you havent been able to figure out. Let things break down. It's sublime and knowing you, you will rarely fail to catch them as they fall.

Alex. -superbly cheesy




darkinshadows -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 3:03:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MidnightWriter

quote:

ORIGINAL: TallDarkAndWitty

quote:

ORIGINAL: MidnightWriter

Taggard - wouldn't that make you a "ballroom top", rather than a "ballroom dom"? [;)]


Why...I think it does!!! If any Mods happen to see this, could you possibly change my descriptor to "Ballroom Top"???

I even like the spinning connotation that goes with that...

Some kinky graphic artist could have lots of fun with an animated avatar for that...


*grinning*

Well... It's not animated... but gimme time...

Peace and Love





[image]local://upfiles/31431/A34FB026E6E6484A92F3FA645316DD99.jpg[/image]




darkinshadows -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 3:19:30 PM)

ok.... that image is showing as an error... and I can't seem to edit it Taggard... so trying again...lol



[image]local://upfiles/31431/B5756FBF52984A8BBB7FB55D62F7F672.jpg[/image]




MizSuz -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 3:45:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TallDarkAndWitty


I think it comes down to desire. I really have no urge to dominate anyone else. I love to be served. I love to own. I enjoy tying a lovely little thing up and doing all sorts of wonderfully sensual things to it. But when it comes down to the whole dominance/submission thing...I am just not into it at all.

Thoughts?



Are you saying that you get nothing out of finding what someone thinks is their 'edge' and then showing them they were wrong, it's further than they thought; and then, still further?

That shit brings out the dominant sadist in me, big time. Not just talkin' physical sorts of things, but testing the commitment to GIVE submission?

Once, to a man who said "I could never do that," I said, "You'd be surprised at what you would do for the right person."

<grin> I wish I had a nickle for every time I've later been told "you were right!"




MizSuz -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 4:01:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Alexander

Ive been searching for my copies of the lemon heads "style" with rick james to add here before I might add to this discussion. No such luck.




http://www.evandando.co.uk/r.htm#rickj

RICK JAMES STYLE (E. Dando/T. Morgan)

Don’t wanna get stoned
Don’t wanna get stoned
But I don’t wanna not get stoned
I don’t wanna not get stoned

Don’t wanna get high
I don’t wanna get high
But I don’t wanna not get high
And I don’t wanna not get stoned

Wanna knock things down
I’m not gonna knock things down
But I don’t wanna not get stoned
So I’m not gonna not knock things down

Don’t wanna think twice
I don’t have to think twice
But I’m not gonna get high
I I’m not gonna get stoned

Style

Not gonna come round
I don’t wanna come down
I just want a killer line
And I’ll figure it out myself

Don’t wanna get stoned
I don’t wanna get stoned
But I don’t wanna not get stoned
I don’t wanna not get stoned

Style






Alexander -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 4:09:33 PM)

!! not the lyrics! lol the actual songs, they did two productions each dynamically different on the same album. the lyrics well.. maybe they do have something to say. Its really gotta be coming out of rick james mouth to sound as sad and poignant as it does.




MizSuz -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 4:11:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Alexander

!! not the lyrics! lol the actual songs, they did two productions each dynamically different on the same album. the lyrics well.. maybe they do have something to say. Its really gotta be coming out of rick james mouth to sound as sad and poignant as it does.



Can't help ya there. How would you have posted that here anyway? Color me confused.




LadyAngelika -> RE: Topping without dominance... (3/17/2005 7:48:02 PM)

quote:

I think it comes down to desire. I really have no urge to dominate anyone else. I love to be served. I love to own. I enjoy tying a lovely little thing up and doing all sorts of wonderfully sensual things to it. But when it comes down to the whole dominance/submission thing...I am just not into it at all.

If you want to serve me, great...but don't expect me to give you menacing glares and use a commanding tone of voice. Don't expect to tremble in fear at my wrath. Don't expect to have me put you in your place for sassing me. It just isn't my thing...

I really think I have come to realize that the only person I want to dominate and control is myself, all others should serve me because that is what they need and desire.

Thoughts?


I can relate 100% to you. I am not anyone's mommy or guardian. I am not going to tell my boys what to do. In fact, one of my boys is technically old enough to be my father! He runs a whole bunch of shows and doesn't need me to run his life. That is the kind of "bottom half" I look for. I don’t have time to take care of someone else’s life. I have enough on my plate!

You are someone who simply "is dominant", rather then "is a dominant" Taggard. That means that your dominance is manifested inherently regardless of whether or not you are participating in kinky activities or not. The other end of the spectrum is imposed dominance, what I consider to be the daddy Dom style. One can be inherently dominant and impose it as well mind you.

I've always personally found simple inherent dominance without having to impose it much more appealing. But that is my personal preference.

- LA




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875