domiguy
Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: petdave quote:
ORIGINAL: novicecourtesan However, I would say that this feeling is familiar to any woman who wears a hot, vaguely slutty dress but covers it up with a coat because she doesn't want to be whistled at on the street. Women too have been trained to take many precautions that men don't feel are necessary, and we get used to it even though we didn't like the unfairness of it. If that woman in a hot dress gets raped, she's going to have her own "guilty until proven innocent" problems. I'm not taking her side; every case is different. I think in the large scheme of things, despite the confusion that men may have in their roles and the bias they deal with in the media and in the law, the balance still tips in the favor of women as being more oppressed. That IS a classic example of gender bias. A woman can wear something that she knows will make her attractive to the opposite sex, then gets upset when men find her attractive. As someone who has never been attractive to anyone, it really blows my mind. Let's set aside for a moment the danger of non-consensually being taken by force, and consider a simple lingering look, or an invitation to dinner or drinks from a man who is clearly not in her league. What will he get? Hostility, self-righteous anger, a sense of having been greatly wronged. Do women get that same response when taking the initiative with men who are unavailable or uninterested? Anyone? Ever? As dogthing discussed, women take for granted that they can flaunt their sexuality and, by and large, receive positive reinforcement for it. Men? Uh, yeah. Feel free to count the admiring glances thrown my way when i'm rocking the beach in my banana hammock. (Joke... before i start getting bills for vomit-damaged keyboards... just a joke) i'll set aside the "lies, damned lies, and statistics" of salary discrimination. In my working life, i've had three male and two female bosses. Frankly, i'd rather be a housepet, and have not-inconsiderable skill in cabinetry, electrical work, automotive maintenance, and other home-improvement skills to add to the usual "Washing, Ironing, Fucking, Et cetera" that most female houseslaves bring to the table (i know there are exceptions). But, obviously, as a male my place is in the office, and if i desire anything different, i'm just a leech and a wannabe. But that's okay, because being submissive by nature is a huge asset to men in the workforce- no one expects us to be aggressive to get ahead. And speaking of submission... how often have you seen clubs or parties that have one price for single women (usually free), one price for couples, and the highest price of all for single men? Niiiice. However, i do admit that to holding a theory that if men and women had equal sex drives, our economy would utterly collapse, so perhaps it is all for the best... for someone, at least. ...dave Please, it is a two way street...there is a huge difference between a glance and gawking...However if a woman, who is usually large breasted, ever negatively alludes to someone who "talks to her chest," but has gone to great lengths to enhance or show off that attribute then they deserve to be called on it. Women have been showing off their tits and asses for years...Initially it could be argued that since most of the designers were men..It woulld make sense...However, now we see many women designers but the trend has not changed at all. I would not entertain a dinner invitation from someone who is not "in my league" either...I would be polite...But that is where it would end. Social skills might be a dying art in the online age...But I have never asked for a date or dinner from a women that wasn't well received...It's because there was a conversation that usually preceded the offer and I had a strong idea as to where I stood with that woman. Most people if treated with common courtesy will respond even if there is no interest on their part in a similiar manner., How this site differs is that men who are or maybe not a Dom, use this as a ploy and think just by saying that I "Dominant" that a sub owes them something....Or by Dommes who don't have a single thing going for themselves... prostitute themselves out in the form of a tribute for some dumb sap to pay for some companionship. Either way it's a rediculous notion and anyone with an ounce of sense would realize that.
_____________________________
|