LuckyAlbatross
Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BitaTruble methodologies, (the "how" of getting your ideas out to others) what you hope to accomplish by the way you present your ethos, to whom you present it and, of course, which particular methods would speak to you and attract your ears/eyes and which methods would you shun? Well it's not just "one method" obviously- but I think I use whichever method fits the medium and what I think will pique the audience. I used to write long prosaic posts but, over the years online, I found that I just preferred to the point, straight down, bulleted posts. I am a highly reactionary person and the more positive feedback I got on this, the more I attuned myself to it. This can be frustrating when someone else comes alone and writes a beautiful prosaic post which says essentially the exact same thing that I said, and they get all the glory for sounding pretty :) But I will say that there is sincere happiness that at least the person GOT the message, and it really doesn't need to be from me that they get it. I love praise and affection and positive feedback, but I actually prefer someone expanding a little more into themselves a lot more. quote:
What causes you to stop and listen to something which may be alien to you? Is it presentation? Perhaps it comes from someone whom you've already grown to appreciate? Is it the length of a post, spelling/grammar, paragraph breaks? Energy. Is that too vague? Let's take you for example. I don't really LIKE you, I get a bad rough feeling on your posts sometimes, and I think it's quirky and have no real desire to spark up a dialogue with you. Personality wise, it's not there for me. But I really love your posts and ideas. Your energy sparks in everything very loud and in living color and you have impeccable grammar and spelling, excellent formatting, and is anything I could ever hope for in a fellow collarme poster. IMO you are an absolute asset to the site and it would be a loss if you stopped posting. How could I not respond to that? It's who you are, it's your own energy in life and the format you provide allows all of that to just shine through as clear as day. quote:
Once you decide to get involved does the content then matter to you if the ethos presented is not and never will be 'your way' of doing things as they relate to D/s? In general, yeah. quote:
Would you feel compelled to question the presentation and if so, would it be for the purpose of learning that particular ethos or more to share your own as a counter-presentation or is it subjective and dependent upon the actual content? Are you open to hearing 'other' ways or is your own ethos pretty well set in stone? SOmetimes I think presentation does cause static and should be addressed, but for the most part I think it's not essential to the discussion. That's why I rarely go back and fix my typos :) There are few things I love better than seeing someone present a coherent, rich, consistent viewpoint- that happens to be completely opposite to my way of thinking. quote:
Last but not least, do you feel that 'your way' is superior to other ways and if not, why do you engage in things the way you do? Of course I do. If I thought another way was superior, wouldn't I be doing it? quote:
If you do feel that your way is superior, do you try to convert others or do you embrace a more exclusive philosophy, such that only those who find it on their own will be shown the inner sanctum or perhaps it's something else entirely? I'll try to convert someone, absolutely, whether it's to try and convince them NOT to get collared in the first six months or to convince them bdsm is NOT better than vanilla sex in general. But not all topics lend themselves to that, trying to argue that apple pie is better than cherry pie is just over the top arrogances and a lack of perspective.
_____________________________
Find stable partners, not a stable of partners. "Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication
|