Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

A Legal Marriage?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> A Legal Marriage? Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 7:42:56 AM   
ExSteelAgain


Posts: 1803
Joined: 7/2/2006
From: Georgia
Status: offline
Most of us are fairly liberal when it comes to personal expressions of sexuality, no matter our political persuasions, I believe. Along that line I think most of us, heterosexual and homosexual, support same sex legal marriages. We see nothing wrong with defining a marriage legally in ways besides the traditional man/woman one.

Although I am not in a poly relationship, my question is why can’t a legal marriage have more than two people? Why can’t three or more people be legally married in one marriage? We have many cases on CM of happy poly relationships where many would support the idea of a marriage where all would have a legal stake. Some states are moving to legalize same sex marriages, why shouldn’t they include other forms of marriage with consenting adults?


_____________________________

You can paint a cinder block bright pastel pink, but it's still a cinder block. (By Me.)
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 7:58:44 AM   
sub4hire


Posts: 6775
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
Does that mean in Utah the law has changed?  Over the years I heard it has and have heard it hasn't in certain areas.
So, no idea of the law the way it stands currently.
Though, if I wanted more than two people in my marriage I would be looking at the law a bit closer.

I agree with you.  Whatever it takes to work if it does work.  Where do you draw the line?  So why draw one at all?

(in reply to ExSteelAgain)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 8:01:21 AM   
canupleaseme


Posts: 775
Joined: 7/9/2006
Status: offline
I think its because the people who made the rules are insecure and worried their partner will then get someone else  I imagine divorce gets quite complivated when there are more than two people involved too lol

Seriuosly though I do agree, but then the world as a whole is close minded and sticks with what its knows already wether it works or not and I guess religion has a lot to do with it. In some religions mulitple partners and mulitple marraiges are acceptable arent they ? ( i could be very wrong with the marraiges bit)  And look how long its taken to get them to change their minds about same sex marraiges.

It is such a shame though that people who have alternative lifestyles cant show their love and commitment in their  relationships by way of marraige when there are more than two of them.

_____________________________

Proud mistress

(in reply to ExSteelAgain)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 8:03:46 AM   
MasterFireMaam


Posts: 5587
Joined: 3/1/2006
From: Charleston, WV
Status: offline
While I agree that poly should be a viable option, I see that it's a slippery slope when you look at the logistic. Marriage unions themselves aren't really the issue. The issues, in my mind, are things like tax breaks for being married, how insurance would work for dependents, how partners might be treated in adoption or custody issues. There's many things to be ironed out if three or more are involved.

As for your statements about how most of us here feel same sex marriages should be legal, I'm willing to bet that the percentage isn't as high as you think. Of course, you have to keep in mind that this is primarily a het board, which is what most pansexual spaces end up being in my experience. It's also my experience that het people are much more inclined to NOT support gay and lesbian marriage, mostly due to there lack of either tolerance or understanding of the issue.

Master Fire


_____________________________

The power of who we are can be intoxicating. The power of who we could be is humbling.
-----
Ms Relationship Books
-----
BDSM How-To Books

(in reply to ExSteelAgain)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 8:45:14 AM   
toservez


Posts: 1733
Joined: 9/7/2006
From: All over now in Minnesota
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterFireMaam

While I agree that poly should be a viable option, I see that it's a slippery slope when you look at the logistic. Marriage unions themselves aren't really the issue. The issues, in my mind, are things like tax breaks for being married, how insurance would work for dependents, how partners might be treated in adoption or custody issues. There's many things to be ironed out if three or more are involved.

Master Fire



That is my issue with all these things. It has zero to do with morality but everything to do with the financial things and how other people in society/employers have to pay for things describe above.

Two separate issues maybe but the fact they are crushed together in our society currently.





_____________________________

I am sorry I do not fit Webster's defintion of a slave but thankfully my Master is not Webster.

"Anything that contradicts experience and logic should be abandoned." - H.H. The 14th Dalai Lama

(in reply to MasterFireMaam)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 9:41:02 AM   
BDSM05478


Posts: 417
Joined: 10/27/2006
Status: offline
I don't agree with same sex marriage, that term was created by a religious organization so only people that fit into that religion should be allowed to get married. That said I support same sex civil unions and wish we had multi partner unions too, so that we can take care of our families. Living in a state that was the first to pass civil unions I was proud to be witness to several same sex unions that first day, alot got married right in city hall park. Maybe one day but there just are not enough poly people to make a difference right now.

_____________________________

"It's a fool that looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart" U.E. McGill

"Never let the future disturb you. You will meet it, if you have to, with the same weapons of reason which today arm you against the present." - Marcus Aurelius

(in reply to toservez)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 10:36:12 AM   
LuckyAlbatross


Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
Think about how messy divorces get or custody battles or survivor benefits.

Now add in more people and families with no precedent.

_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to BDSM05478)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 10:39:21 AM   
ShiftedJewel


Posts: 2492
Joined: 12/2/2004
Status: offline
I would love to see more states go with at the very least a legal union for same sex couples.
 
I attended an Indiana Civil Liberties Union event where we got to ask questions of our representatives concerning same sex marriage. My question was why can't they be legally married? He said that if they make same sex marriage legal that the next thing you know people will want poly legalized and after that they'll be screaming to legalize incest so they are "nipping it in the bud" so to speak... what a crock of shit.
 
Ok, that was my rant for the day.
 
Jewel

_____________________________

Don't ask, trust me, you won't like the answer... no one ever does.

(in reply to BDSM05478)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 11:00:31 AM   
AquaticSub


Posts: 14867
Joined: 12/27/2005
Status: offline
~Fast Reply~

Frederick Douglas once said some very wise words in regards to feminists and their fight during the civil war era. I can not remember the exact quote (if anyone has it, I would love it), but the gist of it was "One battle at a time, first the slaves, then the women."

This country is having trouble saying that two loving people can't marry because they are same sex. I'd really rather not complicate that issue by trying to get the country to legalize more then two. To get that legalized will take a long time and it will be painful. The current legal system regarding marriages and divorces are set up for a two person system. And even with that we are having trouble updating it for equal rights for women. When we start adding more then two to the mix we will have to go back and rewrite everything. That's a lot of time and a lot of money, and a lot more complicated then simple revising everything to gender neutral terms for homosexuals.

_____________________________

Without my dominance you cannot submit. Without your submission I cannot dominate. You are my equal in this, though our roles are different.-Val

It was ok for him to beat me but then he tried to cuddle me! - Me

Member:Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair

(in reply to ShiftedJewel)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 11:04:22 AM   
Plethora22


Posts: 27
Joined: 5/16/2005
Status: offline
So here's the thing.  I'm about as liberal as liberal can be on social issues.  Pretty much anything goes in my book.  However, no one on any side of this issue wants to here my opinion here.

The state (ie the government) should NOT be in the business of validating personal relationships through marriage, period!  Whether it was the original intent or not, defining marriage is by definition offering a validation of a very personal relationship.  Dictating who can marry who inherently creates a subset of people who are going to be left out.  No matter how you define marriage there will be perfectly healthy loving relationships that get left in the cold.

Therefore I've been getting on my soapbox left right and sideways on this issue trying to convince people that the right thing to do here is not to legalize gay marriage, but to abolish marriage as a state sponsored institution.  Not for gay people, not for straight people, not for anyone.  How can we as citizens ask any group of people, much less elected officials who have all sorts of extra political baggage to deal with, to define what is or is not a valid relationship? 

(in reply to ShiftedJewel)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 11:07:08 AM   
Plethora22


Posts: 27
Joined: 5/16/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BDSM05478

I don't agree with same sex marriage, that term was created by a religious organization so only people that fit into that religion should be allowed to get married. That said I support same sex civil unions and wish we had multi partner unions too, so that we can take care of our families. Living in a state that was the first to pass civil unions I was proud to be witness to several same sex unions that first day, alot got married right in city hall park. Maybe one day but there just are not enough poly people to make a difference right now.


So then, why does the state use the term marriage if it is strictly a religion term?

(in reply to BDSM05478)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 11:28:03 AM   
AquaticSub


Posts: 14867
Joined: 12/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BDSM05478

I don't agree with same sex marriage, that term was created by a religious organization so only people that fit into that religion should be allowed to get married. That said I support same sex civil unions and wish we had multi partner unions too, so that we can take care of our families. Living in a state that was the first to pass civil unions I was proud to be witness to several same sex unions that first day, alot got married right in city hall park. Maybe one day but there just are not enough poly people to make a difference right now.


From what I understand civil unions for homosexuals do not provide the same benfits as a marriage.

I am bisexual. I could end up marrying another woman and I would want the same thing any man or woman gets. I want a marriage, I don't want it's redheaded stepchild.

I don't want to force a religious offical to preform a marriage he doesn't agree with, but there are priests who will preform them and I want that.

_____________________________

Without my dominance you cannot submit. Without your submission I cannot dominate. You are my equal in this, though our roles are different.-Val

It was ok for him to beat me but then he tried to cuddle me! - Me

Member:Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair

(in reply to BDSM05478)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 11:29:37 AM   
bearincuffs


Posts: 1904
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline
From what I see and learned over the years concerning the definition of marraige and who is and isn't allowed is from a few reasons. To a large part, the church had a big say in the matter and the moral views of the general population played a part and then politics also became part of this controversy. Yes I know there are several other reasons but just wanted to point a few out. The problem lies with no set definition of what a marraige is that is acceptable with ALL people.
The way I see this is, especially in regards to same sex unions, we basically want the same rights as our hetero counterparts, nothing more and nothing less. Not all gay and lesbian couple want to be married, all they want is the legal right to that option even if they don't use that right.
 
Here in Canada, this isssue was settled a few years ago and now our current Prime Minister is attempting to reopen this issue. He personally is against same sex marraige and plans to change this even though it was made into law 5-6 years ago. The sad part is the government is so intertwined with the religeous sector that it's almost impossible to separate the two. My own personal views on this is I believe people have the right to legally get married if they so choose. I personally don't care if the couple is gay, straight, lesbian etc., I personally won't get married but I want that option if my views do change.

_____________________________

property of Master Dave of the House of Gemini

An it harm none, do as thou wilt
Do what you will, so long as it harms none
An it harm none, do what thou will
That it harm none, do as thou wilt
Eight words the Wiccan Rede fulfill

(in reply to ExSteelAgain)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 11:54:38 AM   
SmokingGun82


Posts: 575
Joined: 6/19/2004
Status: offline
I have no desire to ever get married- and I'd always stated that marriage was not in the cards for me, simply because I don't think the government needs to sanction my feelings for another person. I was in favor of gay marriage in an abstract "Whatever" way, kind of taking the Jon Stewart approach.

Something Penn Jillette said made me feel differently- when he and his (now) wife were having a kid, they tried to find a lawyer who would draw up a contract that guaranteed that the other got the child in the event of death. Under the way laws are written in many (if not all) states, there's no way to make sure of that... other than marriage.

So now I think, first of all, that marriage should be defined (to start with) as two people. Incest, two men, whatever. Polygamy gets into huge issues with financial aspects, so I'd say stay away from it for a while. And I've changed it to I'll never marry... unless I end up in a situation where a child is coming.

Just my thoughts.


_____________________________

It frightens me, the awful truth of how sweet life can be.
- Bob Dylan

Proper capitalization is the difference between "I had to help my Uncle Jack off a horse" and "I had to help my uncle jack off a horse."

(in reply to bearincuffs)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 12:00:28 PM   
ExSteelAgain


Posts: 1803
Joined: 7/2/2006
From: Georgia
Status: offline
For those who simply stated it would be too complicated to have poly legal marriages, I disagree. If you agree with the concept, but doubt the implementation would be practical, how hard would it be for the judge to use a calculator and divide by 3 or whatever?

_____________________________

You can paint a cinder block bright pastel pink, but it's still a cinder block. (By Me.)

(in reply to SmokingGun82)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 12:10:44 PM   
Wulfchyld


Posts: 2618
Joined: 12/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ShiftedJewel

I would love to see more states go with at the very least a legal union for same sex couples.
 
I attended an Indiana Civil Liberties Union event where we got to ask questions of our representatives concerning same sex marriage. My question was why can't they be legally married? He said that if they make same sex marriage legal that the next thing you know people will want poly legalized and after that they'll be screaming to legalize incest so they are "nipping it in the bud" so to speak... what a crock of shit.
 
Ok, that was my rant for the day.
 
Jewel


Very interesting. Did you know that many Native American tribes are poly, and while on the reservation they have legal poly marriages?

_____________________________

Loki, forum god of Mischief

Submission is not a gift... it is plunder!
Where there is a whip, there is a way!
Dom/mes of a feather, beat the f*ck out of slaves together


(in reply to ShiftedJewel)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 12:16:13 PM   
GeekyGirl


Posts: 905
Joined: 8/21/2006
Status: offline
I support gay/lesbian marriage 100%.

On poly marriage, I support it in theory but realize that the legal ramification/complications would be a tremendous barrier to overcome...it's hard enough sorting out divorces, taxes, custody battles etc when there is two people, let alone 3 or more.

(in reply to bearincuffs)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 12:18:47 PM   
AquaticSub


Posts: 14867
Joined: 12/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ExSteelAgain

For those who simply stated it would be too complicated to have poly legal marriages, I disagree. If you agree with the concept, but doubt the implementation would be practical, how hard would it be for the judge to use a calculator and divide by 3 or whatever?


Because that isn't all that goes into marriage laws. There is the matter of spousal support if the marriage dissolves. Who has to to support who? And child custody. Will the parent who doesn't share any DNA just be shafted? Dissolving these marriages will be complicated if two people want to stay together and what will the courts do if suddenly one of the partners claims they were forced to agree to the marriage?

Almost every single marriage law will have to be rewritten. That takes a lot of time and time costs a lot of money. I'd rather wait and get homosexual marriage passed first.

_____________________________

Without my dominance you cannot submit. Without your submission I cannot dominate. You are my equal in this, though our roles are different.-Val

It was ok for him to beat me but then he tried to cuddle me! - Me

Member:Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair

(in reply to ExSteelAgain)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 12:55:09 PM   
slaveish


Posts: 1086
Joined: 2/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: toservez


That is my issue with all these things. It has zero to do with morality but everything to do with the financial things and how other people in society/employers have to pay for things describe above.


Almost ~everything~ is a matter of money, somewhere down the line. It is discouraging, to say the least. What is even more discouraging is that there is such naivete in the huddled masses that ~believe~ Certain Unnamed Leaders when they say that it is indeed an issue of morality.

_____________________________

You only lose what you cling to. ~~Gautama Sidharta

If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. ~~Mother Teresa

(in reply to toservez)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: A Legal Marriage? - 2/28/2007 1:21:24 PM   
ArgoGeorgia


Posts: 256
Joined: 2/9/2007
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Plethora22

The state (ie the government) should NOT be in the business of validating personal relationships through marriage, period! 


I couldn't have said it better myself.  Marriage is for the church - whatever church you want to go to and however they want to do it.  The only thing the government should - maybe - enforce is something along the lines of a civil union.  And this civil union should be completely blind as to the players in the union.  It should be the same as the enforcement of a legally binding contract which can then be enforced via civil courts.  A civil union would be useful in terms of estate matters, insurance, etc. 

Personally, I think that marriage - at least as we know it - is going the way of the dodo bird.  53% of failed US marriages can't be wrong. 

_____________________________

Been there, done that, got the t-shirt. No, seriously. They have t-shirts for everything nowadays.

(in reply to Plethora22)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> A Legal Marriage? Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.093