RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


luckydog1 -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/8/2007 4:50:34 PM)

Sanity I think they have more of a Bronze Age mentality than a Stone Age one....




caitlyn -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/8/2007 7:01:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
Or should I really fear the paranoia that appears to be so contagious in the USA?


One person's paranoia, is another's pramatism.




Sanity -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/8/2007 7:12:29 PM)

I'll give them that. You're right, I was exaggerating just a bit. While they (Muslim extremists) have joined this century in some respects, in other ways they seem to be living at about the time of Moses, in their minds...

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

Sanity I think they have more of a Bronze Age mentality than a Stone Age one....




Sinergy -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/8/2007 7:43:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

You'd think so, but the US promised to make good faith efforts to disarm when they signed onto the Non-Proliferation Treaty.



Fascinates me how those who support Monkeyboy et al are so quick to refuse to adhere to contracts that
were willingly signed by the United States.

This is especially amusing when they are mid-rant about other people unwilling to keep their end of agreements
they signed on to.

Makes me wonder how they run their personal relationships.

Anybody remember a quote "A man's word is his bond?"

Sinergy




Marc2b -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/8/2007 9:23:01 PM)

quote:


If you're exploiting "wiggle room" is it Good Faith at all?

It’s realpolitik.
quote:


Sovereignty is like Virginity. You either have it or you don't. Crossing that "Certain Point" is what we refer to as "An Act of War". And at that point, you lost the moral high ground.

You don’t loose the moral high ground if it’s self defense. Besides, what good is the moral high ground if you’re dead? And, doesn’t a person attempting to end your life forfeit their right to theirs? If the bully is obviously determined to pick a fight with you might as well fight and get it over with.
quote:


If your diplomatic or running away skills aren't able to keep you out of a fight, why surrender the moral position by throwing the first punch. Sure, Han shot first, but Greedo wasn't exactly innocent, either. Maybe that's a bad example. Maybe it isn't. Han never made the claim to the moral high ground in any instance. I'm going to end this analogy right now.

Pass the dutchie to the left hand side.
quote:


I'll use the words of Keith Olbermann to respond... etc, etc, etc.

Olbermann’s snide little tirade is completely irrelevant to my point because he is making the same mistake you are (and meatcleaver) are: you are continuing to focus on the surface details. Your thinking seems to be: well Nazi Germany killed X number of people and Iran has killed Y number of people and since X is way higher than Y Nazi Germany is therefore way worse. In a strict numbers sense that is true in the same way we consider it worse if fifty people are killed in one highway pile up and only two in another. But as I see it what is most relevant is that in both cases (Nazi Germany and Iran) the relevant fact is not what slogan ("Sieg Heil" or "Allah Akbar") is being shouted out while someone is tortured or murdered but the fact that someone is being tortured or murdered. It is what the two have in common that matter. In both case you have a small group of people oppressively ruling a country in order to feed their addiction to the most dangerous, most powerful, narcotic of them all – power itself. Fascism, communism, religious fundamentalism, whatever you want to call the surface ideology, they are merely different masks covering the same thing: human evil. This is what we must fight against, not only in others but in ourselves.




Marc2b -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/8/2007 9:24:14 PM)

quote:

LOL I'm on my back rolling around the floor pissing myself!

It pleases me to know I have brought such joy into your life.
quote:

Or should I really fear the paranoia that appears to be so contagious in the USA?

How is recognizing the fact, and the threat, of human evil paranoia?




Sinergy -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/8/2007 9:32:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

How is recognizing the fact, and the threat, of human evil paranoia?



I recognize the fact that Dumbfuckistan put the evil and paranoid special education reject in office.

Not sure how to go about fixing it.

Sinergy




meatcleaver -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/9/2007 1:26:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

How is recognizing the fact, and the threat, of human evil paranoia?


When you look in the mirror do you see a monster?

How many innocent people have been killed because people in what Sinergy calls Dumbfuckistan voted in a retard who sees lying to start a war to further the business interests of his pals alright?

Give me an evil that kills less innocent people and while Bush is in power with his fucking cockeyed view of the world, that evil is the USA and its lapdogs. Iran is not the nicest country on the planet, neither is it the worst but it holds Bush's interest because of its oil. There is unrest there and people are starting to call for change and there is evidence that change while might not come as quick as people might like, it is going in the right direction, the last thing the world needs is for Iran to be elevated to victim state because Bush's 'Evil Empire' has attacked it because it wants its oil and it wants its oil traded in dollars.




farglebargle -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/9/2007 6:15:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

quote:


If you're exploiting "wiggle room" is it Good Faith at all?

It’s realpolitik.


I *think* that means we agree. When you weasel around, you're not acting in Good Faith, which is a violation of our responsibilities under the treaty we signed onto. Which means the US can't HONESTLY call out anyone else for any violations. "Those who live in glass houses, shouldn't".

quote:


quote:


Sovereignty is like Virginity. You either have it or you don't. Crossing that "Certain Point" is what we refer to as "An Act of War". And at that point, you lost the moral high ground.

You don’t loose the moral high ground if it’s self defense.


It's not "Self Defense" if it's a first-strike. And tampering with the internal affairs of a sovereign nation cannot be self defense, by definition, any acts affecting the US would HAVE TO BE "Foreign" affairs.

quote:


Besides, what good is the moral high ground if you’re dead?


You do not do Evil, some people think this is important.
You do not burn in Hell for all eternity. Some people think this is important.

quote:


And, doesn’t a person attempting to end your life forfeit their right to theirs? If the bully is obviously determined to pick a fight with you might as well fight and get it over with.


Of course, IRAN isn't trying to pick a fight, are they? I don't see a Casus Belli, do you? Get back to me when they commit an Act of War.

quote:


quote:


I'll use the words of Keith Olbermann to respond... etc, etc, etc.

Olbermann’s snide little tirade is completely irrelevant to my point because he is making the same mistake you are (and meatcleaver) are: you are continuing to focus on the surface details. Your thinking seems to be: well Nazi Germany killed X number of people and Iran has killed Y number of people and since X is way higher than Y Nazi Germany is therefore way worse.


It's not the numbers, it's the Evil. Lesse. Hitler invaded, conquered and occupied. Poland. Norway, Netherlands, Belgium and France. North Africa, the Soviet Union, well, you get the picture.

quote:


But as I see it what is most relevant is that in both cases (Nazi Germany and Iran) the relevant fact is not what slogan ("Sieg Heil" or "Allah Akbar") is being shouted out while someone is tortured or murdered but the fact that someone is being tortured or murdered. It is what the two have in common that matter.


The OBVIOUS flaw there is that the United States has a record of using torturing and murdering prisoners, too.

If the link between Germany and Iran is "Torture and Murder", than that group should be "Germany, Iran, AND THE UNITED STATES" have it all in common that matter.

Do you REALLY want to go down that road?

quote:


In both case you have a small group of people oppressively ruling a country in order to feed their addiction to the most dangerous, most powerful, narcotic of them all – power itself. Fascism, communism, religious fundamentalism, whatever you want to call the surface ideology,


By your reasoning, NEO-CONSERVATIVISM is an ideology to be included.

quote:


they are merely different masks covering the same thing: human evil. This is what we must fight against, not only in others but in ourselves.


As long as your willing to accept the WHOLE analogy, and the Bush becomes just as bad as Hitler as Amenidajad, doesn't he. Do you REALLY want to continue your analogy to it's logical conclusion?




thompsonx -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/9/2007 7:49:56 AM)

Mark2b:
Perhaps you could make us a couple of lists.
One list for the treaties that the U.S. has signed and kept and a second one for the treaties that the U.S. has signed and broken.
Oh well so much for honor and integrity.
thompson




Marc2b -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/9/2007 4:13:36 PM)


quote:

I *think* that means we agree. When you... etc.


I'll get back to you.  Right now it's Friday night and I'm outta here.

Everyone have a great weekend.





Sinergy -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/9/2007 5:17:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Killing your own people? You call that winning???
 


This statement seems idiotic.

farglebargle did not, as far as I know, kill anybody.

I believe his statement was that we lost another 100 people and are no clearer to any sort of solution (which would be a state of non-killing of people) than we were prior to their deaths.

I imagine his comment was to indicate that the insurgents in Iraq are winning.  Very similar to the way the Viet Cong were winning.  Of course, there is similarities to the way the insurgents in Afghan were winning.  And while we are talking about historical examples, I imagine the same could be said for the French Resistance in World War Two.

It is easy to armchair quarterback the war and point out that we can kill (napalm, missile from air, send in our Tiger tanks, whatever) anybody we want to, but if the situation never resolves itself (which would be synonymous with a lack of insurgent killing people activity) then I am not sure we can really call it a victory or even "a state of being on our way to winning."

Sinergy

edited to add a /




mnottertail -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/9/2007 5:25:35 PM)

He he he he he, see, lemme tell you all now;

what you don't understand is there is a middle east;

theres a war over there;

a war on terrorism;

we didn't take----uh ----  hold on---

start it but we sure are going to start it now;
you see we have set goals there---

he he he now the libreal meda don't know what that means---
just hannity and colms and we had to send vice president cheney over there

that ---

well, sure
mistakes are being made
and we only need 25000 more troops over there to quell the insurgents
but we got saddam, it never was about the terrorists so well, I don't know what all this ruckis is about WMD and all that anyway
our goal, and let me state this clearly
is to put a democratic society over there
becasue they never had one and they never will
I mean, now that we have made ourself a targret of haterd
we have to keep armerica strong--------

Thanky and I approve this message,
George  W




farglebargle -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/9/2007 7:17:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Killing your own people? You call that winning???



When a Sunni kills a Shia, they aren't killing "Their Own People".





Sanity -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/10/2007 7:18:30 AM)

So you still think they're, what did you call them... something like brilliant, educated, sophisticated and tactically superior?

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

When a Sunni kills a Shia, they aren't killing "Their Own People".






farglebargle -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/10/2007 7:49:58 AM)

"Kicking the shit out of the United States since 2003" will suffice.

You wanna admit getting toasted by ignorant fools for the past 4 years?

Underestimation underlies all the US's failures, doesn't it. What's it called, Hubris?






meatcleaver -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/10/2007 8:33:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

"Kicking the shit out of the United States since 2003" will suffice.

You wanna admit getting toasted by ignorant fools for the past 4 years?

Underestimation underlies all the US's failures, doesn't it. What's it called, Hubris?



Yep. The belief that military power alone can impose all US interests. I guess this is what you get when you get ignorant people in positions of power.  Blair is Bush's lapdog for the same reason, ignorance.




Sternhand4 -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/10/2007 8:54:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

"Kicking the shit out of the United States since 2003" will suffice.

Only because we have show a stunning ammount of restraint.
We should have leveled a few citys after the first insurgent attacks and imposed martial law. Forget shipping insugents to GITMO, a quick bullet in the field is more cost effective.

You wanna admit getting toasted by ignorant fools for the past 4 years?

Underestimation underlies all the US's failures, doesn't it. What's it called, Hubris?
It happens when you try to "humanely" fight a war. War by its very nature is inhumane.
Allowing the decisions in the field to be influenced by CNN polls and washington based politicians will be the failure here. ( just like vietnam )  If you have the will to go to war, make it so brutal that it ends quickly, and in the end you get less of them.







farglebargle -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/10/2007 9:56:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sternhand4

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

"Kicking the shit out of the United States since 2003" will suffice.

Only because we have show a stunning ammount of restraint.
We should have leveled a few citys after the first insurgent attacks and imposed martial law. Forget shipping insugents to GITMO, a quick bullet in the field is more cost effective.

You wanna admit getting toasted by ignorant fools for the past 4 years?

Underestimation underlies all the US's failures, doesn't it. What's it called, Hubris?
It happens when you try to "humanely" fight a war. War by its very nature is inhumane.
Allowing the decisions in the field to be influenced by CNN polls and washington based politicians will be the failure here. ( just like vietnam ) If you have the will to go to war, make it so brutal that it ends quickly, and in the end you get less of them.






If we're fighting a WAR, they why do Congress and Alberto Gonzales both agree that we are not AT WAR?

Wan't to properly fight a WAR? Go to congress, hat in hand, and BEG for an Act of War, with the requsite funding, draft, etc...

Who made the decision to NOT fight a War, but instead ....

Where's the Buck Stop?





MasterGrayWolf60 -> RE: New Warheads: America the hypocrites (3/10/2007 10:19:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BlkTallFullfig

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
Bush? He's got a ways to go yet to catch up with Clinton.
But, they're BOTH terrible.
Oh puhleez! You've got issues (rhetorical) if you think the two men are comparable in any way except having the same title.
Clinton's basically imprisoning Palestinian and Israeli heads of state to try and come to a peaceful conclusion to their issues was the biggest contribution anyone has ever made to world peace in my opinion... Unfortunately, their cuts were too deep.
To the OP, I believe our stupidity and arrogance is what will do us in in the end though. Thinking that we are the ones with the biggest cocks, and no one can tell us what to do, while we preach to everyone else. M


Dude, you really are believing a lot of things that are facutally not true! Do your homework! Regan didn't do shit! His brain didn't even work properly! Alzheimers was setting in during his presidency! What about Iran/Contra? That was Regan helping a Socialist regime kill off indiginous Indians who were protecting they're homes where they've lived since before Columbus! Not rebels! You are really, really misinformed and stupid! The economy was not all that during the Regan years. You are really sick and twisted!




Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875