RE: What is George Bush hiding?????? Can you say "Impeach"? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


FirmhandKY -> RE: What is George Bush hiding?????? Can you say "Impeach"? (3/25/2007 10:22:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

So, you're saying the Local office of the FBI, AND McKay's superiors in Washington City were both in on McKay's supposed suppression of the investigation?

Because, as you well know, the FBI is the one doing the legwork, and he reported pretty much daily to the guys in the FBI HQ Elections Crime office.

They're in on it, too?

It's a VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY, you're saying? McKay being a Republican...

And another thing, since Tony Snow is on record that Bush NEVER WAS CONSULTED ABOUT THE REMOVALS, *exactly* how were they removed BY THE PRESIDENT?


The FBI is a supporting agency to the US Attorneys office.  His "superiors" in the Justice Department in DC give "guidance" about cases and Administration policy desires, but it is the US Attorney on the ground who makes the final decisions about prosecutions, investigations and empaneling grand juries.  Make the Administration or DC AG's office unhappy enough times or on an important enough case ... you lose your job. 

It's simple.  McKay was the man at the nexus to make decisions.  Enough of the decisions weren't satisfactory to the people who appointed him.  He was fired because of it.

And another thing, since Tony Snow is on record that Bush NEVER WAS CONSULTED ABOUT THE REMOVALS, *exactly* how were they removed BY THE PRESIDENT?

Who cares?  You seem to not understand how a large organization operates, with delegation of authority, and operational guidelines, and decentralization in decision making in order to meet those guidelines, just as McKay seems to be ignorant about keeping your higher HQ "in the loop" and satisfied about why you make controversial decisions.

Sometimes, you may make decisions that don't please your higher HQ.  Sometimes you may be correct, and they may be incorrect. 

They are still your higher HQ, and you will suffer the consequences of your decisions.  Acceptance of the responsibility for your actions is an indication of understanding and maturity.  McKay is ... stunned ... STUNNED mind you ... when he finds out that he made his bosses unhappy .... and they let him know about it?

Bullshit.  His use of the word indicates to me someone who is in denial, or is intentionally attempting to change the focus of the reasons for his firing.

Not exactly a principled man in my opinion.

FirmKY




Transdromeda -> RE: George Bush's Watergate and the numerous cover-ups. (3/25/2007 10:23:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

Hahahahahah....Bush acts like a King?  God...that is hysterical.  At least he doesn't act like a King on crack...you know...like Clinton.  Lemme see 1) sexually harassing Paula Jones; 2) the affair with Jennifer Flowers; 3) using the Arkansas State Police to proposition girls and bring them back to him; 4) groping Kathleen Wiley against her will while she was there to talk about her despondent husband who (i think) committed suicide that same day; 5) the alleged rape of Juanita Broderick--a married, Van Buren (pop. 1,500) elementary school teacher; 6) spooging on Monica Lewinsky's dress and then trying to compel perjury, witness tampering and tampering with evidence; 7) giving cold water reactors to No. Korea; 8) failing to take custody of Osama Bin Laden when offered by the Sudan in '96; 9) failing to act on terrific intel and assinating Osama in '98; 10) further encouraging the wall of separation with respect to information sharing between the CIA and the FBI, especially with Jamie Garrelik (sp?); 11) allowing Chinese businessmen to sleep in Lincoln's bedroom in exchange for soft campaign money, 12) doing dozens of "white house coffees" for soft campaign money;  authorizing a U.S. peace keeping force to do a "snatch and grab" of Somali war lords which led to the infamous Black Hawk Down incident, and 13) having the ignominious honor of being the ONLY President in U.S. history to be suspended from the practice of law in his home state for 5 years.  I dunno...Bush doesn't look like such a bad guy in comparison.

What has Bush done, exactly?  We invaded Afghanistan to try to destroy the Taliban after the occurrence of the worst single attack on U.S. soil in our nation's history.  That seemed reasonable.  We invaded Iraq after repeated violations of U.N. resolutions, the violation of any one of which was a justification for intervention (especially firing at U.S. planes...a big No No). That seemed reasonable.  Part of his justification was the presence of WMDs which the entire world thought he possessed and did (read "War on America" by Laurie Mylroi, expert on Iraq to Slick Willy during his administration).  But assuming Sadaam didn't have WMDs, the Brits thought he did, both Clintons thought he did, France thought he did, John Kerry thought he did, John McCain thought he did, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.

Anyway....hey, if anyone is up for it, run a search on how many negative books have been written by former Nixon staffers about their boss vs. how many have been written about Bush by his former staffers vs. how many have been written about Clinton by HIS former staffers.  Would anyone like to venture a guess who has, so far, had the highest number of negative books written about him by his own, hand picked, former staff members????     [image]http://www.collarchat.com/micons/m21.gif[/image]

very succinctly stated lockaway!




MistressMoirae -> RE: If you remember your history th election was stolen from us...we did not really elect him...and as f (3/25/2007 10:29:18 AM)

I just wanted to simply state, that although I do not agree with everything Bush has done, at least I know where he stands on issues.  I believe he has done a good job with all the events that have occured during his term.  I am not going to go into detail, nor plan on making this into a debate.  I just wanted to show my support for our President.[sm=whiteflag.gif]  I can only hope the Dems do not vote to abandon the Iraqi people.  I admire Bush for wanting to finish what our country started by voting to invade (including Dems).




luckydog1 -> RE: If you remember your history th election was stolen from us...we did not really elect him...and (3/25/2007 12:29:55 PM)

farg, where in the constitution is there a requiremnet for an independant audit of the election?  To do so would require open ballot( non secret) voting.  The Feds would know how you voted, your boss would know how you voted, your local mayor would know how you voted, your bank would know how you voted, ect..

Why are you so opposed to the secret ballot?




Sinergy -> RE: What is George Bush hiding?????? Can you say "Impeach"? (3/25/2007 5:12:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Transdromeda

He is THE commander in cheif.  that is his number one duty



Incorrect.  Before you argue.  Please cite the Constitution (that would be the document that describes the duties of the President of the United States) that supports your position.

The part which supports my statement is Article 2, section 2, in case you are unfamiliar with the document in question.

It states the President is the Commander In Chief of the United States Military.

He can order the military to do something..  He cannot tell anybody not in the military to do something.

Sinergy

edited to add an er.

p.s.  A good site with accompanying commentary is...

http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/constitution/constitution.htm




FirmhandKY -> Everyone Loves GW Bush! (3/25/2007 7:13:01 PM)

Actually, sinergy ...


US Militia

From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access
[wais.access.gpo.gov]
[Laws in effect as of January 20, 2004]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between
  January 20, 2004 and December 23, 2004]
[CITE: 10USC311]

 
TITLE 10--ARMED FORCES
 
Subtitle A--General Military Law
 
PART I--ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL MILITARY POWERS
 
CHAPTER 13--THE MILITIA
 
Sec. 311. Militia: composition and classes

    (a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
    (b) The classes of the militia are--
        (1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
        (2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

So .. unless you meet one of the disqualifications (are you an employee of the Post Office, a customs house clerk, a member of the executive or legislative bodies of the US or of a State?) ... you are a member of the US militia .... and, are subject to the President being your Commander in Chief when he declares you to be ...

Enforcement of Federal Authority
 
Sec. 332. Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority
       
    Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State or Territory by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.


There are other laws that the President can call any member of the militia into the National Guard or Reserve, and then activate any member of the Guard and Reserve for Federal duty as well ...

So ... yes, if you meet the requirements for a member of the US Militia, President Bush is indeed YOUR Commander-in-Chief.

Enjoy the new feeling of empowerment and obligations.  [:D][:D]

FirmKY




Sinergy -> RE: Everyone Loves GW Bush! (3/25/2007 7:19:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

are subject to the President being your Commander in Chief when he declares you to be ...



Has he?

No.

While hypotheticals are interesting, they are not relevant to the present discussion.

Sinergy






FirmhandKY -> RE: Everyone Loves GW Bush! (3/25/2007 7:23:33 PM)

sinergy,

If your profile is accurate, you are 44 ... that makes you part of the Federal Militia until your 45 birthday.

However, depending on the laws of your state (CA?) some state-defined militias give an age of up to 69 - as long as they are abled-bodied.  You might want to check CA law on the subject.

State militias are subject to activitation by the Feds, and if you are part of your state militia, then Bush is STILL your commander-in-chief, no matter what your age, if you are part of a state militia that defines you as such.

FirmKY




Sinergy -> RE: Everyone Loves GW Bush! (3/25/2007 7:26:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

sinergy,

If your profile is accurate, you are 44 ... that makes you part of the Federal Militia until your 45 birthday.

However, depending on the laws of your state (CA?) some state-defined militias give an age of up to 69 - as long as they are abled-bodied.  You might want to check CA law on the subject.

State militias are subject to activitation by the Feds, and if you are part of your state militia, then Bush is STILL your commander-in-chief, no matter what your age, if you are part of a state militia that defines you as such.

FirmKY



Please answer my question.  According to what you cited, the President CAN call me into active service in the militia.

I asked you "Has he?"

Sinergy

p.s.  Assuming he has not, then your whole argument is hypothetical and not born out by extant reality.




FirmhandKY -> RE: Everyone Loves GW Bush! (3/25/2007 7:27:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

are subject to the President being your Commander in Chief when he declares you to be ...



Has he?

No.

While hypotheticals are interesting, they are not relevant to the present discussion.

Sinergy


Not hypothetical at all.  You are a member of the milita.  That makes him your Command-in-Chief.

Congress was empowered under the Constitution [Article 1.8.15] to call "forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions." Also, under the Constitution [Article 1.8.16] the Congress shall have the power "to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such Part of them a may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress."

Just thought I'd give you the Constitutional authority.

FirmKY




michaelOfGeorgia -> RE: Everyone Loves GW Bush! (3/25/2007 7:31:44 PM)

quote:

Everyone Loves GW Bush!


not everyone




Sinergy -> RE: Everyone Loves GW Bush! (3/25/2007 7:32:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Congress was empowered under the Constitution [Article 1.8.15] to call "forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions."



Please answer my question

HAVE THEY CALLED FOR THE MILITIA TO EXECUTE THE LAWS...?
 
quote:

 
Also, under the Constitution (Article 1.8.16) the Congress shall have the power "to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such Part of them a may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress."



Simply quoting the same non sequiter passages over and over in response to a direct question seems a trifle obtuse on your part.

The question is "Have they called forth the militia?" 

Sinergy

Edited to get rid of some text.




FirmhandKY -> RE: Everyone Loves GW Bush! (3/25/2007 7:32:57 PM)

Let me walk you slowly throught the logic:

1.  You are a member of the unorganized militia.

2.  The unorganized militia is a branch of the US Armed forces:

TITLE 10--ARMED FORCES
Subtitle A--General Military Law
PART I--ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL MILITARY POWERS
CHAPTER 13--THE MILITIA
Sec. 311. Militia: composition and classes

3.  The President is the Commander-in-Chief of all US Armed forces.

4.  That makes him your Commander-in-Chief.

Clear now?

FirmKY




dcnovice -> RE: Everyone Loves GW Bush! (3/25/2007 7:36:56 PM)

quote:

The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.


Does this mean we're all entitled to veterans benefits? [:)]




Sinergy -> RE: Everyone Loves GW Bush! (3/25/2007 7:37:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Let me walk you slowly throught the logic:

1.  You are a member of the unorganized militia.

2.  The unorganized militia is a branch of the US Armed forces:


TITLE 10--ARMED FORCES
Subtitle A--General Military Law
PART I--ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL MILITARY POWERS
CHAPTER 13--THE MILITIA
Sec. 311. Militia: composition and classes


3.  The President is the Commander-in-Chief of all US Armed forces.

4.  That makes him your Commander-in-Chief.

Clear now?

FirmKY



It is not clear.  According to what you cited he CAN call me into the militia.

My question is "Has he called me into the militia?"

If the answer to my question is NO, then I am not a member of the militia.

Sinergy




FirmhandKY -> RE: Everyone Loves GW Bush! (3/25/2007 7:43:17 PM)

Questions:

1.  Do you meet the qualifications for one of the militias as defined by 10USC311?

2.  Is a militia an Armed Forces of the United States?

3.  Is the President the Commander-in-Chief of all US Armed Forces?

FirmKY

PS.  It's funny to watch you squirm.  [:D]  I know you hate the thought of him being your CINC, but ... there you go.




michaelOfGeorgia -> RE: Everyone Loves GW Bush! (3/25/2007 7:45:05 PM)

he's not MY CnC




FirmhandKY -> RE: Everyone Loves GW Bush! (3/25/2007 7:46:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.


Does this mean we're all entitled to veterans benefits? [:)]


hehe ... hell, I'm a vet, and not entitled to much in the way of veteran's benefits!

FirmKY




Sinergy -> RE: Everyone Loves GW Bush! (3/25/2007 7:46:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

1.  Do you meet the qualifications for one of the militias as defined by 10USC311?

FirmKY



No.  I do not.

The President has not called a standing militia into being.

Next question?

Sinergy




FirmhandKY -> RE: Everyone Loves GW Bush! (3/25/2007 7:47:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelOfGeorgia

he's not MY CnC


So you don't meet the qualifications of being in the Federal or your State militia?

FirmKY




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875