RE: Effective Gun Control in England (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


MstrTiger -> RE: Effective Gun Control in England (3/27/2007 10:43:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterC46910

Almost forgot, England is not a firearm based society?   Some of the finest firearms have came from England for years.  They had and still have some of the finest firearm makers in the world.

It is always nice to be knowledgeable about your own country.


Yes we like to make firearms and sell them for lots of money to silly people who like to kill each other, Britain also makes and exports a lot of very nice toffee so using the same logic you applied to your point does that mean you would also claim Britain is a toffee based society? What about apples we grow some lovely apples in Britain so does that mean we are a apple based society also.




MasterC46910 -> RE: Effective Gun Control in England (3/27/2007 11:06:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrTiger

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterC46910

Almost forgot, England is not a firearm based society?   Some of the finest firearms have came from England for years.  They had and still have some of the finest firearm makers in the world.

It is always nice to be knowledgeable about your own country.


Yes we like to make firearms and sell them for lots of money to silly people who like to kill each other, Britain also makes and exports a lot of very nice toffee so using the same logic you applied to your point does that mean you would also claim Britain is a toffee based society? What about apples we grow some lovely apples in Britain so does that mean we are a apple based society also.



Is your apples some of the best in the world?  Is your toffee some of the best in the world?  Even your best tea comes from somewhere else.  But some of the best firearms are made in your county....

Your are not known for your military weapons, but your hunting firearms...so do not get ahead of yourself. Then again you did come up with the Mark II




MstrTiger -> RE: Effective Gun Control in England (3/27/2007 11:24:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

What is? gun crime? crime in general?

By the way, you've just quoted the equivalent of fox news. According to the daily mail and associates, we're all going to die unless we lock up anyone walking down the street without an ID card.

For the record:

The US has a higher rate of murder and rape than Britain (per head).

Britain has higher rates of other crimes such as burglary.


violent crime in general on these last ones

from the last site:
US = Murders with firearms (per capita): 0.0279271 per 1,000 people

UK = Murders with firearms (per capita): 0.00102579 per 1,000 people

now i read further and see that some people are commenting as to the accuracy of the reports on this last one...  it does seem pretty high for the us


http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/fidc9397.htm
now according to the dept of justice firearm deaths are .00028 here based on a 300million population

not sure where to go for that in the uk...  looks like they had their decimal point off on that nations site


Looking at your figures 13,300 people were murdered using a gun in the USA in 1997 compared to less than 100 people in the UK even taking into account the fact that the USA has 6 times more people than in the UK. I don’t claim to be very good at maths though it is apparent that if you scale up the population of the UK to mach that of the USA the figures in your link indicate that people in the USA are atleast 21 times more likely to be killed with a gun than people are in the UK. I really don’t see how these figures work towards supporting the argument you are trying to put across perhaps you can explain what it is you are trying to get at?




seeksfemslave -> RE: Effective Gun Control in England (3/28/2007 12:25:59 AM)

Jack45 posted the following quote....
**False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience**; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. ... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
-- Thomas Jefferson quoting criminologist, Cesare Beccaria

Tho' I dont support the idea of people walking around armed to the teeth I think in general this quote is spot on and in particular the bit I have *starred* should be on every Heath and Safety executive's desk Then most of the time they would do nothing so we could get rid of them. Simple 'ennit.
 
Tried to hi lite the starred bit and my post window disappeared. 




Real0ne -> RE: Effective Gun Control in England (3/28/2007 12:59:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrTiger
Looking at your figures 13,300 people were murdered using a gun in the USA in 1997 compared to less than 100 people in the UK even taking into account the fact that the USA has 6 times more people than in the UK. I don’t claim to be very good at maths though it is apparent that if you scale up the population of the UK to mach that of the USA the figures in your link indicate that people in the USA are atleast 21 times more likely to be killed with a gun than people are in the UK. I really don’t see how these figures work towards supporting the argument you are trying to put across perhaps you can explain what it is you are trying to get at?



Well its just not that simple.  you cannot look strictly at homicides and cry no guns.

We have to talk about crime in its totalisty.   We also have to look at culture.  Some people are savages.

The point is that the safest places in the usa is where people are amed to the teeth.   i feel the safest knowing everyone around me packs iron.  Only an idiot would pull a weapon and expect to live with the gerneral public armed to the teeth,  swiss crime as a case in point.


The Wall Street Journal Europe
June 4, 1999 Stephen P. Halbrook

In 1994, when the U.S. Congress debated whether to ban "assault weapons," a talk show host asked then-Senator Bill Bradley (New Jersey), a sponsor of the ban, whether guns cause crime. The host noted that, in Switzerland, all males are issued assault rifles for militia service and keep them at home, yet little crime exists there. Sen. Bradley responded that the Swiss "are pretty dull."

For those who think that target shooting is more fun than golf, however, Switzerland is anything but "dull." By car or train, you see shooting ranges everywhere, but few golf courses. If there is a Schuetzenfest (shooting festival) in town, you will find rifles slung on hat racks in restaurants, and you will encounter men and women, old and young, walking, biking and taking the tram with rifles over their shoulders, to and from the range. They stroll right past the police station and no one bats an eye. (Try this in the U.S., and a SWAT Team might do you in.)

Tourists--especially those from Japan, where guns are banned to all but the police--think it's a revolution. But shooting is the national sport, and the backbone of the national defense as well. More per capita firepower exists in Switzerland than in any other place in the world, yet it is one of the safest places to be.

According to the U.N. International Study on Firearm Regulation, England's 1994 homicide rate was 1.4 (9% involving firearms), and the robbery rate 116, per 100,000 population. In the United States, the homicide rate was 9.0 (70% involving firearms), and the robbery rate 234, per 100,000. England has strict gun control laws, ergo, the homicide rate is lower than in the U.S. However, such comparisons can be dangerous: In 1900, when England had no gun controls, the homicide rate was only 1.0 per 100,000.

Moreover, using data through 1996, the U.S. Department of Justice study "Crime and Justice" concluded that in England the robbery rate was 1.4 times higher, the assault rate was 2.3 times higher, and the burglary rate was 1.7 times higher than in the U.S. This suggests that lawfully armed citizens in the U.S. deter such crimes. Only the murder and rape rates in the U.S. were higher than in England. The small number of violent predators who commit most of these crimes in the U.S. have little trouble arming themselves unlawfully.

The U.N. study omits mention of Switzerland, which is awash in guns and has substantially lower murder and robbery rates than England, where most guns are banned.
http://www.theblessingsofliberty.com/articles/article11.html


   More than half of all reported offences in Scotland in 2000 occurred in the Strathclyde Constabulary area, which has the country's lowest rate of legally held guns. (190 firearms and 503 shotgun certificates per 100 000).
http://www.basc.org.uk/content/armedcrime


To:  The United Kingdom Parliament

Gun crime in the United Kingdom continues daily. Amidst a knife amnesty knife crime has in reality risen to a pandemic magnitude. Law abiding citizens live in fear of teenage mobs that hold no respect for anyone or anything. Law abiding citizens have to rely on a police force that fails to serve and protect. The victims of the United Kingdoms failure to protect its citizens are evident in the recent deaths:

It is time that the government of the United Kingdom allow its citizens to protect themselves from the threat of undiscriminating attack and murder.

Sign this petition and lets try to make the United Kingdom change for the better. Let us take back our streets, our homes, our lives and not live in fear of teenagers running around with knives and ready to kill for fun.
http://www.petitiononline.com/X1013/petition.html




MstrTiger -> RE: Effective Gun Control in England (3/28/2007 1:49:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Gun crime in the United Kingdom continues daily. Amidst a knife amnesty knife crime has in reality risen to a pandemic magnitude. Law abiding citizens live in fear of teenage mobs that hold no respect for anyone or anything. Law abiding citizens have to rely on a police force that fails to serve and protect. The victims of the United Kingdoms failure to protect its citizens are evident in the recent deaths:



That is in utter pile of shit 100 people per year dying out of a population of 60 million does not constitute a pandemic, more people die in britain every year from accidents involving their trousers than die from being shot.

You can attempt to dance around the fact as much as you like though in the USA where there are lots of guns you are more than 21 times more likely to be murdered than in the UK where there are less of them. I should also say that my estimation of 100 people killed every year in the UK by guns is grossly inflated I just rounded it up to make comparing the numbers easier.

If the Swiss people can all run around with guns perfectly happily and not kill each other then that’s lovely for them though why are 13300 American people dieing every year, if the Swiss can play nicely with there guns then why can Americans not? I think it is pretty apparent to everyone that the USA's gun laws have failed pathetically it is failing the American people regardless of comparisons with other places. 13300 people dyeing every year should be regarded as a major national tragedy, it is not something that should be brushed under the carpet just for the good of maintaining what is written on a somewhat out of date piece of paper. You might try to continue to argue that Britain’s gun laws are failing and in my opinion they don’t appear to be doing particularly well though at least the UK government and people are trying to do something about it. You also need to bare in mind the fact that since less than 100 people are shot in the UK every year someone would have to go out tomorrow and murder 2000 people with a gun before the UK gun laws would be proven to have failed as pathetically as USA’s approach clearly has. Ultimately I think if you are trying to suggest that the USA has found a better approach to gun legislation than the UK or anywhere else for that matter then you really are proving yourself to be a rather silly person.




Real0ne -> RE: Effective Gun Control in England (3/28/2007 2:09:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrTiger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Gun crime in the United Kingdom continues daily. Amidst a knife amnesty knife crime has in reality risen to a pandemic magnitude. Law abiding citizens live in fear of teenage mobs that hold no respect for anyone or anything. Law abiding citizens have to rely on a police force that fails to serve and protect. The victims of the United Kingdoms failure to protect its citizens are evident in the recent deaths:



That is in utter pile of shit 100 people per year dying out of a population of 60 million does not constitute a pandemic, more people die in britain every year from accidents involving their trousers than die from being shot.



first that littel clip was mor eso about rising knife crime, since banning seems to work so well for the uk that may be a good route to go on that method of crime as well.   Then when people just start choking each other to death they can resort to either handcuffing the whole country or simply banning hands and amputate everyones hands at birth...   but then i suppose they will bite each other to death...

The point here and in my last post is that the us has more "gun" homicide, (all other formes excluded), 27 times, than the uk.

The us also has less armed crime then the UK, up to 50% less in some cases.

That and the swiss has less than both of us.

The moral of the story is that taking away guns may educe gun homicide but not necesairily reduce crime as a whole.

where the us fucked up is they made the laws backwards.  If they wanted to prevent crime they would have passed laws that every american must own a gun and mandate training and practice shoots once per year.

Now if the us ever figures that out we will have successful gun laws like the swiss do.

The swiss are armed to the teeth, my kind of people frankly.

sorry about all the typos fingers arent working right tonite LOL




seeksfemslave -> RE: Effective Gun Control in England (3/28/2007 2:31:59 AM)

MstrTiger : there is not one reason why there is more gun crime in the US than the UK.The social and economic attitudes are quite different and failure for any reason in the US can lead to quite desperate poverty.

Also there exists the racial problems that we in the UK used to feel so smug and superior about. That was of course before we imported large numbers of different racial groups, and then what did we see? The tendency for the US situation to develop in the UK.

Since strict gun laws were introduced in the UK, the rate of gun crime here has gone up. NO?




meatcleaver -> RE: Effective Gun Control in England (3/28/2007 4:06:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

first that littel clip was mor eso about rising knife crime, since banning seems to work so well for the uk that may be a good route to go on that method of crime as well.   Then when people just start choking each other to death they can resort to either handcuffing the whole country or simply banning hands and amputate everyones hands at birth...   but then i suppose they will bite each other to death...

The point here and in my last post is that the us has more "gun" homicide, (all other formes excluded), 27 times, than the uk.

The us also has less armed crime then the UK, up to 50% less in some cases.

That and the swiss has less than both of us.

The moral of the story is that taking away guns may educe gun homicide but not necesairily reduce crime as a whole.

where the us fucked up is they made the laws backwards.  If they wanted to prevent crime they would have passed laws that every american must own a gun and mandate training and practice shoots once per year.

Now if the us ever figures that out we will have successful gun laws like the swiss do.

The swiss are armed to the teeth, my kind of people frankly.

sorry about all the typos fingers arent working right tonite LOL



The Swiss don't have successful gun laws, they have one of the highest gun homicides in Europe, as do Finland which is due no doubt that in both countries guns are widely available and kept at home. As for violent crime for material gain, both are afluent countries and have little poverty so most of their crime is white collar crime as opposed to inner city type, violent crime.

Gun crime might be going up in Britain but 200% of almost nothing, is still not very much and most gun crime is limited to black on black crime in the inner cities which has been made fashionable by imported gangsta rap (I wonder from where?). As for knife crime, this is also limited on the whole to certain inner city areas and is mainly youth crime. Inner city youths being the group most likely to be the victim of violent crime, despite the tabloid media suggesting affluent middleclasses in white suburbia should be barricading themselves in their homes at night.

However you look at it there are two main reasons for violent crime, (relative) poverty and access to weapons. As for the Swiss and the Finns having little poverty but having a lot of gun homicdes, they are the two most boring countries in Europe and they have to do something to liven the place up.




Page: <<   < prev  8 9 10 11 [12]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125