luckydog1
Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006 Status: offline
|
No one has said what you say they say from what I have read an written. The period after the Big Bang called Inflation. Of course you have heard of it.It did only last 10^-35 seconds, but it was before any of the forces in our universe existed, no nuclear forces, no gravitaional forces, ect, exactly the sort of chaos you say would exist if not for the Laws of Physics. They did not always exist. This energy created them. I'm sure there are forms of life we couldn't even dream of. But you utterly rule out energy based life, Like Gjosts or faries? Or the concept that life is an expression of energy from another dimension/outside. Some sort of anti entropy energy sort of like the first moments of big bang theory. You simply rule out that the fields or particles we detect might also be in other dimensions at the same time. The contention I have, is that I don't buy that two or more separate rules, laws, call them what you will interact with each other or exist together. That is limiting yourself to your own view, who says they have to be seperate? Just you. The term Supernatural is imperfect, as are all words. We obviously don't exist as individual life forms on certain levels because we can't exist outside our environment and our environment depends on energy from outside it. I don't see any problem with that. That is not at all what I meant As for religion, while the imagination can dream up all sorts of stuff, looking at religion, it is not as imaginative as scientific thought That is your personal opinion, I disagree and has a tendency to refuse to be asked probing questions where scientific thought positively encourages scepticism and questioning because that is how it function. Yes we all see how Global warming scientists love skepticism, and questioning, 2 threads are currently running on it here. I know people claim it doesn't (But the evidence of reactions questioning Human cuased Catastrophic Global Warming is undeniable is it not?)but that is people who pluck a thought out of mid air, claim it is true and offer no evidence. A la religion. We get that you hate religion so dismiss any sort of paranormal/supernatural/spiritual idea and have since you were 8 and have never given it a serious thought since. You define it in a very limited way and restrict yourself to arguing against your own weak definition. But this isn't even about religion. Supernatural
< Message edited by luckydog1 -- 4/8/2007 3:20:21 AM >
|