RE: Test to see if people can read..... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


SDFemDom4cuck -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 4:41:26 PM)

quote:

An idiot is an idiot is an idiot... no matter the name it goes by


Or even a complete idiot...(checks mail for note from Mod 11) heeeey how come you can say idiot but I get reprimanded.

Sooo what exactly does the ability to read this crap mean?

So if a woman says to a man "You're a complete idiot and your logic is flawed" is she being a bitch or is she simply stating a fact?

If a man says "You people are simply too stupid to understand what I'm trying to say because I'm far more intellectually superior" is he still an idiot?

Points to ponder my friends, points to ponder.





FukinTroll -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 4:45:29 PM)

Okay Jo. You must understand that Mods are genetically engineered. The down side is they can't see "Not here Blue", so you have to slip your posts in using "not here blue".
 
Slurp!




SDFemDom4cuck -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 4:47:50 PM)

SlurpyTroll
 
I see...point taken. However you did not answer the questions I have put out into the universe to ponder. Unlike the OP I actually wanted an answer to mine.
 
 Although that is why I put complete idiot in invisible blue




mnottertail -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 4:54:13 PM)

Hah?  WTF?  is there an alternative universe?

Ron




SDFemDom4cuck -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 4:57:32 PM)

quote:

Hah?  WTF?  is there an alternative universe?


Only the one in which the OP exists Ron.

What I find hilariously funny is that you of all people are confused by this.






KnightofMists -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 4:58:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SDFemDom4cuck

heeeey how come you can say idiot but I get reprimanded.



must be the way I say...




SDFemDom4cuck -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 5:10:12 PM)

quote:

must be the way I say...


LOL yes that must be it. I've learned my lesson in regards to how to say it.




Slavetrainer2007 -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 6:09:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: oArioch

To a certain extent, BDSM realtionships begin as vanilla relationships.

You have to have that initial meeting, and it usually isn't a kinky one. So.
Considering the dynamics of that first step.

This is posed rhetorically. No response is called for.

A woman says to a man, "I'd like to get to know you first, have a few dates before
we have sex".

Is she being reasonable? Why or why not?

A man says to a woman, "I'd like to get to know you first, have sex a few times before we date".

Is he being reasonable? Why or why not?

Should her physical investment in sex be valued more than his investment of time, energy and money in dating?

If he has sex, and never sees her again, is he a bad person?

If she has a date (lets him invest his time, money and energy) and never sees him again, is she a bad person?

Again: no response is called for.  These are questions intended to provoke reflection, not a morass of public masturbation.  I'm not posting this to gain attention, just offering it for what it may be worth to you as a tool for self-examination. Please don't fu*k it up by posting your predictable rants in response.
It isn't important that others see what you think about this.  What's important is that you take a fresh look in the mirror. Thank you.





What is important here is not the questions themselves but the directions that come after the question. Posted on a discussion board  with replys allowed, yet do not turn ths into a discussion.

And this is where the topic and the post meet.  You read the instructions.  And the questions presented. But overlooked the meaning of post. Instead it was turned into a debate  over the meaning of the post and the questions.

In theory you failed the test. 
So can you read? Yes.
Do you turn what you read into something its not? Sometimes. Sometimes we over analyze, over debate and   just plain spend to much time  worrying about the petty things. Like why does the posters directions not make sense? They dont make sense because  the poster wants to know if you can focus on the topic, without getting wrapped up in the petty details. The focus being the questions proposed for thought.  The details being why it was posted on a open board and replys were allowed.




Twicehappy2x -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 6:26:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SusanofO

Well it was interesting to read, Twicehappy2x, IMO. Also, I like your new avatar pic (I am thinking that's you in the pic, but maybe not).


Thank you.

Lol, you would be right, i am on a KTM 450 EXC running an enduro.




LaTigresse -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 6:48:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SDFemDom4cuck

quote:

Hah?  WTF?  is there an alternative universe?


Only the one in which the OP exists Ron.

What I find hilariously funny is that you of all people are confused by this.



I doubt we are all confused. I would say many are probably more like me, with a serious lack of "give a shit".




SDFemDom4cuck -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 6:55:02 PM)

quote:

I doubt we are all confused. I would say many are probably more like me, with a serious lack of "give a shit".


I just found it humorous because Ron often confuses me with his posts. I enjoyed having confused him for a change.

Ah, well that makes sense..for me I'm home sick trying to write a frickin paper on Nuclear Medicine. It's a nice little distraction much like poking an angry idiot bear with a stick.

Not that I would ever hurt a poor defenseless animal...that's simply the best analogy I could come up with.




SusanofO -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 6:55:34 PM)

SlaveTrainer2007: Well, I answered the OP's questions. In fact, most of my original post was answering his questions, and in some considerable detail. Did you? You answered w/a kind of related comment, anyway (but not the actual OP's questions).

I felt I was in  a sort of a Catch-22 position when I did it, so I went on to explain why I did (and maybe should not have bothered). I see your point, and hey, if anyone wants to discuss the OPs topic, I am game.

But, I've already answered his query in some detail. He's not going to give me any feedback (I am guessing), so I won't ever know if it mattered, either, or made sense to him. 

He's not even bothering to host his own thread, so I can't see how this is a life-or-death deal for him, even if he's received some pointed comments. Sorry if that sounds cold, I am truly not a cold person. I just really thought it was an immature request from an OP.

And, believe it or not, I don't normally bother to comment, if I am irritated about some little thing any OP might do that I wouldn't necessarily do - it's  a waste of time, IMO, and I have the option of not reading a thread, if I don't like it.

There has been once or twice, but not usually. I just wondered where this request could possibly have come from, except from a completely self-centered POV, and I guess that is what really bugged me about it. Plus the remark about how "everyone" needs to "take a fresh look at themselves in a mirror". C'mon. He knows "everyone"?

I am not a cynic. Maybe it would have been better to say nothing, I dunno. Gosh I feel kinda guilty now (really). But, where is he if he is feeling "misunderstood"? If he doesn't care enough to even make comment one, or even be around to clarify anything re: His topic, I can't get overly concerned, but do see your point, a bit.

- Susan 




Sinergy -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 7:23:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SDFemDom4cuck

quote:

An idiot is an idiot is an idiot... no matter the name it goes by


Or even a complete idiot...(checks mail for note from Mod 11) heeeey how come you can say idiot but I get reprimanded.

Sooo what exactly does the ability to read this crap mean?

So if a woman says to a man "You're a complete idiot and your logic is flawed" is she being a bitch or is she simply stating a fact?

If a man says "You people are simply too stupid to understand what I'm trying to say because I'm far more intellectually superior" is he still an idiot?

Points to ponder my friends, points to ponder.




I have already clarified this for the boards, SDFemDom4cuck.

Womens faults are many, men have but two.
Everything they say, and everything they do.

Please write this down; I hate repeating myself.

Sinergy

edited to remove an extra m




TigressFL -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 7:29:03 PM)

quote:

Ohhh... how very coy of you. The slurp that is not there. That’s is just ornery. ORIGINAL: FukinTroll


Yes it is! I thought you would get a kick out of that lol

edited to get the quoting right lol




SDFemDom4cuck -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 7:31:32 PM)

quote:

I have already clarified this for the boards, SDFemDom4cuck.

Womens faults are many, men have but two.
Everything they say, and everything they do.

Please write this down; I hate repeating myself.

Sinergy


Sinergy, have I ever told you how much I adore you...in a completely platonic fellow Dominant way??? I totally need that on a bumpersticker!

Duly noted!




Sinergy -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 7:36:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SDFemDom4cuck

quote:

I have already clarified this for the boards, SDFemDom4cuck.

Womens faults are many, men have but two.
Everything they say, and everything they do.

Please write this down; I hate repeating myself.

Sinergy


Sinergy, have I ever told you how much I adore you...in a completely platonic fellow Dominant way??? I totally need that on a bumpersticker!

Duly noted!


The feeling is mutual, and yes you have :)

Sinergy




hisannabelle -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 7:53:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Slavetrainer2007
What is important here is not the questions themselves but the directions that come after the question. Posted on a discussion board  with replys allowed, yet do not turn ths into a discussion.

And this is where the topic and the post meet.  You read the instructions.  And the questions presented. But overlooked the meaning of post. Instead it was turned into a debate  over the meaning of the post and the questions.

In theory you failed the test. 
So can you read? Yes.
Do you turn what you read into something its not? Sometimes. Sometimes we over analyze, over debate and   just plain spend to much time  worrying about the petty things. Like why does the posters directions not make sense? They dont make sense because  the poster wants to know if you can focus on the topic, without getting wrapped up in the petty details. The focus being the questions proposed for thought.  The details being why it was posted on a open board and replys were allowed.


greetings slavetrainer,

the majority of my post, with the exception of a comparatively tiny postscript about what i saw as the stupidity of baiting people by telling them NOT to answer, WAS a response and discussion of the original post's questions. as other people did, i chose to actually focus on the meaning of the thread. i thought that WAS the point.

annabelle.




dcnovice -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 8:02:25 PM)

quote:

I don't know who he is or might be.


Me neither, and it's driving me nuts.




dcnovice -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 8:09:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: oArioch

To a certain extent, BDSM realtionships begin as vanilla relationships.

You have to have that initial meeting, and it usually isn't a kinky one. So.
Considering the dynamics of that first step.

This is posed rhetorically. No response is called for.

A woman says to a man, "I'd like to get to know you first, have a few dates before
we have sex".

Is she being reasonable? Why or why not?

A man says to a woman, "I'd like to get to know you first, have sex a few times before we date".

Is he being reasonable? Why or why not?


Are we assuming that all relationships are heterosexual? Is that assumption reasonable?




SDFemDom4cuck -> RE: Test to see if people can read..... (4/14/2007 8:14:01 PM)

dc...check your mail sweetheart.

Sinergy...awww thanks. I'm all verklempt...perhaps it's the cold medicine though.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875