RE: angered a few?

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: angered a few?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: angered a few?

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: angered a few? - 4/17/2007 5:32:17 AM

hereyesruponyou

Posts: 770
Joined: 1/22/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhiplashSmile

OK.. since you play guitar.. I do myself and this is how I'm going to make it relate.

Just as there are many different styles of music, so are there styles of relationships in BDSM. There are many different Techniques. Some songs/scenes played can be Heavy and Hard.. some are soft and sweet. Painful, Happy, Dark.. just as many moods in music.. so comes to play in BDSM scenes. For some interactive fantasy and interactive long di relationship work.. others not. The important aspect of any relationship is Communication. It's simply easier now for people to communication now days. This helps bring people together and closer to one another. Many people do long and desire for a Physical relationship. However, they can spend time getting to safely know and feel out each other online or over the phone. Also, if two people can be faithful to each other long di... you know without question they will be in the Real time as well. WHEW....

To take this a step further....there are many ways to interact with music. I may not be able to play an instrument, or write music, but when i listen to it, i am interacting as it affects my mood and inner being. My experience is completely different than those who are on the creative side, but it is no less real. The same is true for many on the cyber side. Yes, some do just yank each others chains online, but to say you can't have the same deep level of emotional committment is incorrect. Reminds me of a guy i used to work with who didn't believe in love. There was just no way to prove it to him because he could not empathize.

(in reply to WhiplashSmile)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: angered a few? - 4/17/2007 8:12:18 AM

Devilslilsister

Posts: 1262
Joined: 8/3/2006
Status: offline

want to know what everyones laughing about = (

_____________________________

My ability to cope with BS is at an all time low - me

i may look like i'm doing nothing, but i'm very busy at a cellular level

(in reply to hereyesruponyou)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: angered a few? - 4/17/2007 4:15:16 PM

Griswold

Posts: 2739
Joined: 2/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TantricOne

I see I upset a few that prefer their online fantasies lol, that wasn't meant, was hopefully meant to give reason to have someone in more than a "cyber" way. Yes there are people behind the keyboards, no there's nothing really "wrong" with being online only, just a waste of good asses for spanking and other things lol, which can only be done virtually with words, not actual contact, not online.....I suppose that if some are satisfied with that, more power to 'em.

How'd you do that? With yours being the first post and all?

Did you have a moment in your mind? Were you experiencing a conversation that hadn't taken place yet?

(in reply to TantricOne)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: angered a few? - 4/17/2007 7:24:26 PM

TemptingNviceSub

Posts: 3054
Joined: 10/1/2005
Status: offline

I am right there with you Dev...I have definitely missed something..grrr...anyone care to enlighten me??....Tempting

(in reply to Devilslilsister)

Profile

Post #: 24

RE: angered a few? - 4/17/2007 8:33:22 PM

sambamanslilgirl

Posts: 10926
Joined: 2/5/2007
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

you have to read his other threads before reading this one

_____________________________

...2011 - year of the fabulous rock star life ...and i do it so well...

...announcing Mr. & Mrs. British Petrol ...yeah, marrying into oil is slick business...

(in reply to TemptingNviceSub)

Profile

Post #: 25

RE: angered a few? - 4/18/2007 4:07:35 AM

Sinimint

Posts: 131
Joined: 1/25/2007
Status: offline

Although the OP possibly worded his last post re online relationships in a not soo nice way, I do understand where he is coming from.

For people who have never and probably would never have an online relationship and have always had a real time in flesh relationship, it is extremely hard to understand how it can work. I know I find it hard to get my head around it - and would never do it, I need the physical contact of the man I love.

But he is probably like me and many others who just cant get their head around it - we dont believe it is wrong, it's just hard to understand from out point of view.

But if it works for you - that is truly wonderful. As I've said many times before "each to their own".

(in reply to sambamanslilgirl)

Profile

Post #: 26

RE: angered a few? - 8/7/2007 10:37:58 PM

came4U

Posts: 3572
Joined: 1/23/2007
From: London, Ontario
Status: offline

Angered whom? where?

If you are telling people you (in mail? chat?)only do online then you are honest and they have the right to decline. Are you saying you toy with people for a bit, then notify you have no intention of meeting??? Then I can understand how you have pissed people off.

(in reply to Sinimint)

Profile

Post #: 27