RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Pulpsmack -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 2:14:57 AM)

You are born with the right to bear arms, but it is your choice not to excercise it, and there's nothing wrong with choosing to abstain. You and I would both prefer to some people abstaining from excercising this right because they are not willing to put the proper practice in, or they don't observe proper safety proceedures. All I can do is contribute to the education of new shooters and live up to my part of being a responsible gun owner.




meatcleaver -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 2:16:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pulpsmack

The thing that people cannot wrap their heads around is that arms control is a lost cause. It’s an impossibility. Not an unlikelihood… an impossibility. We can bury our heads in the sand and make hopeful gestures like pissing in the wind, or we can accept the reality of the situation and do our best to protect ourselves. The only effective way of countering the violence (short of sociological breakthroughs) would be to have a police state, which runs counter to everything this nation stood for.


Yep. You can't protect the paranoid from the enemies in the shadows.

Just about every other developed country has gun control with the result of significant lower deaths than the US through firearms. You have yet to explain why so many guns in American society fails to protect people from firearms.




Pulpsmack -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 2:44:52 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

Yep. You can't protect the paranoid from the enemies in the shadows.


I suppose the guy who tried  to rob and kill me a few years ago was just a shadow.

quote:

Just about every other developed country has gun control with the result of significant lower deaths than the US through firearms
.

Welcome to your page 2 flashback. There has been statistical submission that other industrialized nations that have gun control have fewer gun-related deaths. Nobody is arguing that point. Any other statement on the matter however, is pure bullshit speculation. Lower numbers do not mean causation. We have already hashed and rehashed the point that there are a myriad of factors in the United States that makes it impossible to compare it with any other European nation. Whatever you choose to extrapolate from that is your own unfounded speculation. 

quote:

You have yet to explain why so many guns in American society fails to protect people from firearms.


That's simple. Because guns simply exist. As usual people today cannot grasp the obvious. a non-sentient steel object is no more the cause than it is a cure. Guns do not cause problems. Their misuse/abuse by the actions of destructive or negligent people cause the problems. Guns do not solve problems. Their proper use by the actions of responsible lawful persons solves problems.

So we have these guns sitting there, not doing anything. Today a criminal is going to jam one in his belt and mug a woman at 10:00 am. He is a felon and cannot have a gun. He lives in a state where concealed carry is not authorized. Yet HE is going to use his gun to help him inflict an ill on society.

I am going to get up. I am going to go to school today. I am going to have to leave my gun behind, because of state campus regulations. If there is any problem that occurs today where I could have thwarted it having been adequately armed and prepared with my firearm, it's too bad. For all the guns I have, they do me no good when I cannot legally carry them. That is one potential good a firearm could have caused (thwarting a robber, rapist, shooter) that cannot occur because of that regulation

A robber can pick his victims. He can choose how many problems to cause (until stopped). I cannot choose my superman deeds for the day. I was caught once nearly 4 years ago in a place where I was permitted to carry. The robber chose me. The only people who can choose to do good with firearms are the police who use them in the line of duty when responding to calls. More often than not, they are responding to cold calls. Nevertheless, for every good use of a firearm by a cop or armed citizen, there are how many bad uses by a criminal.

The reason is simple enough. Either there are more criminals than cops and citizens who choose to arm themselves, or there is an equal number, but the criminals by disregarding the law may carry wherever they please and use them in any circumstance. Citizens and Cops cannot. That is why the guns haven't made the difference... because they are tools. You need the people to make the change.

So you are left with one of two choices to enforce this ideal peace: either disarm the people completely and rule with an iron fist, ignoring all civil liberties and imposing draconian punishments to all who violate or collaborate. Or you forcibly arm the people charging them with their civic duty as peacekeepers of the land and give them full training, and force them to drill.

Neither situation is acceptable to the American people (or MOST of these European nations that you tout).




meatcleaver -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 3:06:59 AM)

You still haven't explained why gun control in other societies mean less deaths through guns and than less gun control in America does. According to your reasoning the result should be the other way round. It appears to me that American gun culture encouages criminals to carry guns rather than discourages them. Whatever it is, the widespread access to guns and its iconic status in American culture means more gun related deaths and crimes.




Pulpsmack -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 4:18:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

You still haven't explained why gun control in other societies mean less deaths through guns and than less gun control in America does.


That sentence doesn't make sense and I am not sure what you are trying to say as a result.




seeksfemslave -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 4:22:44 AM)

Just to tack this on regarding banning weapons; in the UK many types of guns were "banned" after an incident in which several people were shot.
Gun crime has continued and almost certainly increased but since it is clouded by the race issue stats. are hard to come by.

Pulpsmack, your posts are a pleasure to read. Lucid and cogent.




BOUNTYHUNTER -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 4:42:10 AM)

AS a free society and in the land of the so called free we were born with the rights to bear and own arms,IF every past American especially during our fight for Independence had not a rifle we probably would be drinking English tea and crumpets.I believe gun control in schools and business,they have the right to say "NO"I wish you were there last winter as I tried to ship my long guns and a 44mag to Utah where I was going to hunt that year.THE authorities had to get involved but after about 4 hours they were in the hole and I was on board.THE problem is not owning guns,I agree with what was said here that people that buy must go thought a training program before giving the opportunity to own that gun...Many buy short guns and leave them lie around to become lost in the hands of children.WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF THEY SUCCEED IN BANNING GUNS?Then only the criminals.rapists and thugs will have them...GET real America,some of this problem like at VT could have be quelled from the start,to start with he was a certified nutt case and probably off his meds,the slip up in voluntary admission to a mental health clinic wasn't reported.this allowed him to have a clean bill of health to but the 9MM.NO surveillance cams in the dorms or class rooms just a few of things that could have save many lives.IF they banned the making and owning guns there would in the next 40 years still be those out there with plenty of them...as always just the views of this ol"master 




Real0ne -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 5:16:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pulpsmack

The thing that people cannot wrap their heads around is that arms control is a lost cause. It’s an impossibility. Not an unlikelihood… an impossibility. We can bury our heads in the sand and make hopeful gestures like pissing in the wind, or we can accept the reality of the situation and do our best to protect ourselves. The only effective way of countering the violence (short of sociological breakthroughs) would be to have a police state, which runs counter to everything this nation stood for.


Yep. You can't protect the paranoid from the enemies in the shadows.

Just about every other developed country has gun control with the result of significant lower deaths than the US through firearms. You have yet to explain why so many guns in American society fails to protect people from firearms.


you have yet to explain why countries with gun control have significantly higher number of victims of "violent crime" than the US.  i maintain "pick your poison", and i woudl rather, no i insist on my right to both own and bear.

So whats better about more violent crime in these "developed" countries?




Real0ne -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 5:26:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BOUNTYHUNTER

AS a free society and in the land of the so called free we were born with the rights to bear and own arms,IF every past American especially during our fight for Independence had not a rifle we probably would be drinking English tea and crumpets.I believe gun control in schools and business,they have the right to say "NO"I wish you were there last winter as I tried to ship my long guns and a 44mag to Utah where I was going to hunt that year.THE authorities had to get involved but after about 4 hours they were in the hole and I was on board.THE problem is not owning guns,I agree with what was said here that people that buy must go thought a training program before giving the opportunity to own that gun...Many buy short guns and leave them lie around to become lost in the hands of children.WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF THEY SUCCEED IN BANNING GUNS?Then only the criminals.rapists and thugs will have them...GET real America,some of this problem like at VT could have be quelled from the start,to start with he was a certified nutt case and probably off his meds,the slip up in voluntary admission to a mental health clinic wasn't reported.this allowed him to have a clean bill of health to but the 9MM.NO surveillance cams in the dorms or class rooms just a few of things that could have save many lives.IF they banned the making and owning guns there would in the next 40 years still be those out there with plenty of them...as always just the views of this ol"master 


Since you specifically used the term "right", that is only true if it is a private school, or a private business,  Corporations are straw men and have no "rights"  they have priveledges, at least constutionally.  Only people can have rights.

Likewise i agree with training and also refreshers.  After all since the gun is an integral part of this society it only makes sense that we dispell the myths about them that those who are terrified by the very thought have by teaching them not only to understand them but to use them as well.




Real0ne -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 5:36:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pulpsmack
The reason is simple enough. Either there are more criminals than cops and citizens who choose to arm themselves, or there is an equal number, but the criminals by disregarding the law may carry wherever they please and use them in any circumstance. Citizens and Cops cannot. That is why the guns haven't made the difference... because they are tools. You need the people to make the change.

So you are left with one of two choices to enforce this ideal peace: either disarm the people completely and rule with an iron fist, ignoring all civil liberties and imposing draconian punishments to all who violate or collaborate. Or you forcibly arm the people charging them with their civic duty as peacekeepers of the land and give them full training, and force them to drill.

Neither situation is acceptable to the American people (or MOST of these European nations that you tout).


Well said!

These gun laws like most laws lately are set to play on peoples fears and have no substance in reason.  The fact is that a criminal by definition does not obey the law or they woudl not be a criminal, one would have to be either naive or totally ignorant to think that a criminal is going to obey a "gun law".   Criminals will always have guns regardless of the laws imposed on the "law abiding" citizen.





meatcleaver -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 5:38:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

Just to tack this on regarding banning weapons; in the UK many types of guns were "banned" after an incident in which several people were shot.
Gun crime has continued and almost certainly increased but since it is clouded by the race issue stats. are hard to come by.


The % of gun crime in the UK is low so any increase will be magnified when in presented in percentages.




meatcleaver -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 5:47:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

you have yet to explain why countries with gun control have significantly higher number of victims of "violent crime" than the US.  i maintain "pick your poison", and i woudl rather, no i insist on my right to both own and bear.

So whats better about more violent crime in these "developed" countries?



Violent crime is defined and recorded differently from country to country so it is difficult to compare loosely defined crimes like violent crime which could be a violent rape or a punch thrown on a drunken Saturady night, where as somebody being murdered is a definitive act and can be compared.

British crime has gone up and down depending on how the information is collated and depending on compensation and insurance requirements. It is sometimes in the interests of people who have lost property such as phones and wallets to say they were mugged. All the police do is fill a report sheet which the victim gives to the insurance company or to the solicitor making the claim, this then goes down in the stats. It is also the case that some crimes the police won't record because since the adoption of game theory and internal markets, organisations fill out statistics to fullfill government targets. Having seen this in action while working for the probation service, I wouldn't trust any British crime figures apart from murders because then, there is a body involved that can't be buried in the out tray or denied as not existing by insurance companies.

One thing I can say is that I lived in a supposed most violent areas of London for six years and never came across any violent crime in my day to day life and nor did my wife who would have made an easy victim.




Donnalee -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 5:54:11 AM)

Where I live there is very little gun crime outside of the odd nut barricading himself with a hostage in a cabin.  Most people carry guns around here, and surely have one in the car.  Only a nut would pull a gun out in a store around here to rob it:  they know full well that getting shot by all of the customers is the most likely outcome.




meatcleaver -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 5:57:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Donnalee

Where I live there is very little gun crime outside of the odd nut barricading himself with a hostage in a cabin.  Most people carry guns around here, and surely have one in the car.  Only a nut would pull a gun out in a store around here to rob it:  they know full well that getting shot by all of the customers is the most likely outcome.


As I said, just count the murder victims from country to country and you have something definitive to compare.




Vendaval -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 6:07:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pulpsmack

If your concern is merely about young hotheads who are illegally carrying/misusing firearms on/off campuses however, then we are speaking about completely different matters.

That is my main concern.

My argument has been one allowing for legal carry by qualified adults on public property. If these students or nearby dwellers are under twenty one years old, or if they don't meet all of the qualifications, or they do meet the qualifications but would carry in a reckless, negligent or dangerous way, then they do not apply, because these people are criminals, and they can/will do these things regardless of legal permissiblilty.

So in this instance, you are referring to college campuses and
dormitories as public property?

There are certain campuses where firearms are going to be present,
a military academy or gun smith school as two examples.
 
 
How much do the laws differ from state to state?
 
What is the legal criteria for a qualified adult?
 
Do ROTC students carry firearms on campus?

Do the laws differ at different institutions or is the policy

set by the state board of education?
 
What about private colleges and universities?
 
Would the decision be made by the board of trustees?





farglebargle -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 6:10:38 AM)

"Shall Not Be Infringed" always seemed clear enough to me.





Lordandmaster -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 6:13:49 AM)

Have you ever lived in a country where there is reasonable gun control?  Try buying a firearm in Britain or Denmark, and you'll see that it is indeed much more difficult to acquire one.  You can't walk into Dixie Wahoo's Strip Mall Gun Shop and pick up a Glock.

I think it's pretty simple:

Insane college student + Glock = 33 dead, lucky it wasn't more
Insane college student + knife = 1 dead maybe if he has been taught how to use a knife.

Oh, and another thing you said: There are already too many guns in the street, so it makes no sense to regulate their distribution further--what kind of an argument is that?  That's like saying there is too much shit in the toilet, so it makes no sense to flush it.  Other countries (again, like Britain) had serious handgun problems in the past.  I agree that few countries on earth--probably not any, come to think of it--have let their handgun problems get as bad as we have, but I fail to see how that is an argument never to try to clean up the mess we've made.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pulpsmack

quote:

Lordandmaster

The flaw in this kind of reasoning is the assumption that "the bad guys" will have equal access to firearms whether they're legal or not.  It's just not true.  The murderer in this case bought one of his weapons at a local gun store.  Just walked right in, Hi, I'd like to buy this one.  If you remove strip-mall gun outlets from society, lone psychotics are going to have a MUCH more difficult time finding firearms to kill people with.  Terrorists, mobsters--sure, they'll still find ways to buy guns if they need them.  But insane South Korean college students won't.


I would counter with the flaw in reasoning is that less freedom to acquire means “much more difficult” or even impossible to acquire. Any nation that is a serious military power has enough weapons and security issues that ensure such instrumentalities will be readily available to the criminal population. Just this year we have had an MP5 submachine gun, a Glock .40 pistol, and two AR-15s (2 separate occasions) stolen from police cars in TX. There are too many guns here in the civilian population alone to EVER make regulation in the criminal world a reality. Remove those and it is too easy given the weaponry available to the military and law enforcement. Remove that and our borders are too soft to repel imported firearms from China, Russia, Mexico, etc. Remove that and a good old machine shop and some simple know how can churn out submachine guns from scratch.

The thing that people cannot wrap their heads around is that arms control is a lost cause. It’s an impossibility. Not an unlikelihood… an impossibility. We can bury our heads in the sand and make hopeful gestures like pissing in the wind, or we can accept the reality of the situation and do our best to protect ourselves. The only effective way of countering the violence (short of sociological breakthroughs) would be to have a police state, which runs counter to everything this nation stood for.




Real0ne -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 6:27:54 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Insane college student + Glock = 33 dead, lucky it wasn't more
Insane college student + knife = 1 dead maybe if he has been taught how to use a knife.



Insane college student + chemicals = many more dead
Insane college student + home made bomb from kitchen supplies = a shit load dead

If someone wants to kill many people as he did they will just get more creative.

So whats up here boys and gurls.

Why does everyone who are "for gun banning" totally discount or refuse to look at the "fact" that where guns are banned the UK for a case in point, there is MORE VIOLENT CRIME!   Its like these people are blind that and only speak to one half ignoring the data. 

So while you and others are banning guns your mother is getting raped because she cannot defend herslf.  Nice trade off.




Pulpsmack -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 6:29:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval
So in this instance, you are referring to college campuses and
dormitories as public property?

I am referring to college campuses and dormitories of public schools as public property

There are certain campuses where firearms are going to be present,
a military academy or gun smith school as two examples.
 
 
How much do the laws differ from state to state?
 
Unbelievably. Places like California and NY are intolerable police states with respect to to firearms regulation whereas the southern states like TX and LA have much more lattitude in terms of permit issuance, where one may carry with the permit, and how deadly force may be used.

What is the legal criteria for a qualified adult?
 
That will vary from state to state. In LA the permit applicant must be:

- 21
- A legal resident
- Free from mental infirmity or chemical dependency
- Free from felony or domestic violence assault charges
- Free from bench warrants (including those issued for traffic offenses) or restraining orders

In addition, the applicant must undergo the NRA basic safety course and provide proof of certification. If the applicant wishes to renew the permit upon expiration, (s)he must recertify with the NRA course.

Do ROTC students carry firearms on campus?

 
ROTC students (as I am aware) are permitted to bear arms in accordance with any ROTC organized event or with permission for a purpose relevent to the program.

Do the laws differ at different institutions or is the policy

set by the state board of education?
 
As far as I am aware, they differ at different institutions absent statutory provisions, but this may/may not be the case from state to state

What about private colleges and universities?

Absent statutory provision private universities may make their rules to permit/prohibit the lawful carry of firearms on campus. In my state carry is prohibited by state statute on all universities (that I am aware of) but that does NOT apply to student residences, the student's vehicles, or public roads that run through campus. I am not sure what legal effect a violation of a private campus' carry policy would have if any (since there is a state statute in LA it's moot) you would have to consult your own state laws. 

Would the decision be made by the board of trustees?

I am not certain of this for the reasons above.
 






Pulpsmack -> RE: Gun Control And Tragedy (4/19/2007 6:45:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Have you ever lived in a country where there is reasonable gun control?
 

No. I have only lived in the US and the way they have tried to control guns with respect to the Second Amendment is not only unreasonable, it's constitutionally impermissible.

quote:

Try buying a firearm in Britain or Denmark, and you'll see that it is indeed much more difficult to acquire one.  You can't walk into Dixie Wahoo's Strip Mall Gun Shop and pick up a Glock.


Can you buy cocaine at the chemist's in the UK? I would suspect you could not, but how difficult would it be to acquire if you were looking for it there?

quote:

I think it's pretty simple:

Insane college student + Glock = 33 dead, lucky it wasn't more
Insane college student + knife = 1 dead maybe if he has been taught how to use a knife.



Precisely. You THINK. Prior to this incident I would have THOUGHT a lone jackass of his stature armed with a 9mm Glock and a .22 would kill or injure about 12 people at best before being overtaken by some students as he paused to reload. It turns out that he managed to kill more than double what I THOUGHT. Your speculation is irrelevant.

quote:

Oh, and another thing you said: There are already too many guns in the street, so it makes no sense to regulate their distribution further--what kind of an argument is that?  That's like saying there is too much shit in the toilet, so it makes no sense to flush it.  Other countries (again, like Britain) had serious handgun problems in the past.  I agree that few countries on earth--probably not any, come to think of it--have let their handgun problems get as bad as we have, but I fail to see how that is an argument never to try to clean up the mess we've made.


You have taken my statement out of context, and your shit analogy doesn't work. There are already too many guns in the street, so regulation serves NO purpose other than to take them out of the hands of the law-abiding. The analogy would be (as best as I can translate) "there is so much shit in the toilet, you are better leaving it to crumble in the bowl, because if you attempt to flush, it will back up and end up all over your shoes." The only way to clean the mess is to plunge the bowl (re-write the constitution or just ignore it and violate it).

The reason why the analogy doesn't work is because it is not a mess at all. It is an unfortunate, inevitable consequence of having the freedom we do. Nevertheless, it is worth the costs, even though they exact a terrible price.




Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875