Aswad -> RE: You must be this tall to ride! (4/20/2007 7:13:06 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CuriousLord Not sure. It's one of those attributes like moderlately-sized breasts that get ingrained into the consciousness. A female being too tall would be a strike against her physical apperance. Ah. Well, that makes more sense. Height is neutral for me, appearance-wise. Apart from the legs, of course. quote:
Then again, physical appearance isn't a major factor in my book, so it's not like height would ban a girl from my consideration. I just perfer 'em short. True. Appearance is only a small part of attraction. quote:
Haven't heard many guys tell me that they liked taller women before. First time the reason isn't "SEXY LEGS!!" Well, the legs are a plus, obviously. And eye contact is easier. But, mostly, there's just the bit about preferring strength, of all kinds, in a slave/sub/bottom. Both because I think it adds something to submission, and because I like a challenge; bringing a lapdog to heel does not have the same satisfaction (in that regard) as "taming"* a wolf. Guess I'm just a sucker for romance, or something. Sincerely, Aswad. * Wolves don't tame, AFAIK. I had a mated pair tolerate me, but that is as far as it went. Lovely creatures.
|
|
|
|