WillowRain
Posts: 191
Joined: 6/18/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: daddysprop247 quote:
ORIGINAL: juliaoceania My Daddy uses me for his own pleasure, does not pressure me into a response that might be hard to obtain (in other words if I know it will take a long while to orgasm I will tell him this information and he can do about that what he wants). I do not see him as being selfish or uncaring that he takes his pleasure and release without my release. I get pleasure from this, very deep satisfying pleasure from this. I do not think that it is an ego thing for all men, I think it is an exchange of energy when orgasms happen. I have a very tantric bent on orgasms, they can be a spiritual experience, and I would never deny my partner that experience if he desired it and I could provide it. I do not mean to degrade people who are nonorgasmic by suggesting that without orgasms energy is not exchanged, because it is. It is a different feeling though. I know I have yielded my orgasmic response in ways with Daddy that I have never done with other men. I feel like my orgasms are a form of my submission to his pleasuring me. He truly enjoys taking his time to do this, and it would seem unsubmissive of me to deny him when I am capable of it. If neither of you enjoy your orgasms, that is fine, but I am wondering why you care what other dominants desire this from their submissive.... especially since orgasms are an intense bonding experience (at least for me they are) well honestly i have never understood the idea of orgasms, or anything sexual for that matter, being a bonding experience. for me sex is using or being used, serving or being served. well with the exception of what i call "vanilla" sex, which i view as sex with the desire/goal being mutual pleasure and excitement (as opposed to mutual fulfillment...something different). it's a curious thing to me that sooo many Dominants seem to be so focused on a submissive's orgasms and sexual arousal in general because as Dominants i would think that 1, their top (not necessarily only) priority would be their own pleasure, and 2, they would understand that a submissive's main (again, not necessarily only) priority and focus would be on pleasing them. i understand what owned was saying, in that just because a particular Dominant wishes for his submissive to experience sexual arousal does not mean that is making sex "all about the submissive." as i told Aquatic, i can't imagine any Dominant going there. however the intense focus on the subject, especially from so many Dominants, is what i have a difficult time understanding. Dear daddysprop, I do find your posts so interesting. You and I experience the world in such a differant way. Sometimes I totally get and relate to how you experience things and sometimes I feel like we are two very different exotic flowers in lifes hot house. Maybe part of the difference flowing through this thread break along the line of slave and submissive? I'm not sure. Part of what makes D/s so alluring for me is the depth of knowledge of another. My knowing someone else very deeply, and them knowing me. That disclosure, is very emotionally important for me. Knowing how I work sexually, is part of that for me. Having a girl that likes and needs orgasm for personal balance, (not even considering that making other people come is flat out fun) and not finding it interesting to play with that would strike me as odd. It would be like having a really nice race car and never driving it over 55. Why own one? Your case is very differant, you describe your relationship in a way that makes me think that you handle beautifully. Like it would be a pitty if your Daddy didn't take you, and drive you sometimes in a way that utalized your ability to handle so easily, like when he takes you all three ways by the door. I bet you take hair pin curves like nobodies business. Orgasm for some people is a chore, for some people it is a treat, and for some people it is a necesarry bodily function. And that range really changes I think how they individually should be cared for. Think in the animal world, like owning pets. If you have a fat lazy little weiner dog, maybe it needs walks, mostly it adores cuddles. You can train it to do anything with food. That's one kind of animal. But say you decide to own a little work dog, an australian shepard. That dog needs a job or it will go bonkers. It needs tons of activity and something to herd, You need to work with that type of dog and train it (in general). It needs a daily job to be it's happiest. So in the slave/submissive world, maybe we are just in a sideways fashion talking about types of animals and the people that like to own them. Maybe in saying, "Why do some Dominantas care so much about their toys orgasms?" Well, maybe you are just kinda recognizing a certain kind of owner... like... "OH, yeah.... Jerry over there, he really likes Pomeranians." "OH her, yeah, she's got four Rotties." or "Ted? Yeah Ted has a whole team of sled dogs, he sleeps with them out in the snow when they are training." Apples, oranges, and pears. So when you meet a dominant that is wired to like to focus on that, maybe it's just a heads up that he isn't the type to match a girl like yourself. He's made for a differant kind of animal. :)
|